Ed clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham?

Status
Not open for further replies.
shuize said:
It really is lose/lose as the only reasonable explanations seem to boil down to incompetence or dishonesty (or incompetence and dishonesty).
Click to expand...

Oh yeah, I totally neglected to mention dishonesty and general sleaze in my analysis!

Hillary Soup:
2 cups of greed
2 cups of arrogance
a dash of incompetence
55 gallon drum of sleaziness
 
TheL8Elvis said:
A quick search shows the only 2 posters in this thread using the term "right wing conspiracy" are you, and 16.5.

Birds of a feather, etc.
Click to expand...

Is that when I noted that Hillary fans were using it in The Hillary is Dead thread?

Why don't you do a broader search for "conspiracy" I think you will find a veritable orgy of that in this thread, and not using it the mocking way to refer to Hillary Clinton's infamously stupid whine that she and her husband were the VICTIMS of a "vast right wing conspiracy."

Damn, she does sound like a loon don't she?
 
DavidJames said:
Of course, but many of us live in this century.
Click to expand...

Sure, David, sure. That's why you're backing Hillary. Because nothing says 21st Century like an old grandmother with head trauma who doesn't understand technology.
 
Ziggurat said:
Sure, David, sure. That's why you're backing Hillary. Because nothing says 21st Century like an old grandmother with head trauma who doesn't understand technology.
Click to expand...

Clinton's lawyer has stated there's no evidence a breach occurred. But her campaign declined to provide NPR with any details about how the server was protected.

Aitel says Clinton's server was more vulnerable to attack than ones in the State Department because the private server didn't have access to a major federal program called Einstein. It can't stop all attacks, but the cyber-defense effort has blocked a lot of them by looking for intrusions and sending alerts to public agencies.

"There's reasons you don't hire FedEx to move your top secret material around. They don't have the capability to protect it," Aitel says.

The conclusion, given all the hacks that have taken place: "the next president needs to understand cybersecurity issues, not shrug at the difference between deleting and wiping."

And LORD KNOWS that ain't Hillary!
 
TheL8Elvis said:
A quick search shows the only 2 posters in this thread using the term "right wing conspiracy" are you, and 16.5.

Birds of a feather, etc.
Click to expand...

It's cute seeing Shillaries get so upset over something their hero said! It's almost as if they don't know!:rolleyes:
 
TheL8Elvis said:
Nope.
Click to expand...

'k.

Hillary 1998: "I do believe that this is a battle," she said. "The great story here for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president."

Hillary 2015: CNN's Brianna Keilar asked Hillary is if she understood why Americans "don't believe that you're honest and trustworthy," Clinton pointed to a "constant barrage of attacks that are largely fomented by and coming from the right."
 
TheL8Elvis said:
Uhm, ok - lump me in with all the people that don't call it the clown car, don't call people shillaries, and don't go on about 20 year old quotes about vast right wing conspiracies
Click to expand...

17 year old quote. But let's not quibble. The important point is that we need to stop picking on Hillary, it's just so mean.
hqdefault.jpg
 
Ziggurat said:
Curious:
5 months of gaps in Hillary's emails
Click to expand...

Not really.

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2015/09/246874.htm


QUESTION: There was a release today by Judicial Watch from its lawsuit, and it cited several email gaps it claims existed in the former secretary’s list of ledger – full ledger of work-related correspondence.

MR KIRBY: Yep, seen the press report, Brad. We’re not aware of any gaps in the Clinton emails set with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Secretary Clinton used a different email account that she has already advised she no longer has access to. And as I understand it, Secretary Clinton’s representatives have publicly stated that she used a separate email account in those first few months of her tenure. But beyond that, there’s no gap that we have seen or are aware of in Secretary Clinton’s email messages.
QUESTION: In that early part, you mentioned there was a gap of, I think, one month before – from the first received email to the first sent email. Now, I realize it’s fully possible she didn’t send an email that was work-related in that first month – that first month when she had that account, but is that your understanding or is that still an incomplete – you’re still fully researching all of those emails or unearthing them?

MR KIRBY: I know of no research attempt to deal with those first few months, Brad, because, as I said, former Secretary Clinton’s representatives already indicated that they were aware this gap existed and that she had – no longer had access to them. So it’s difficult if not impossible to do any particular research or forensics to get at those first few months. And as for how many were sent and received in that timeframe, I just don’t know. But this is not something that hasn’t been addressed before by her representatives. And beyond that first couple of months, those first four months, we have seen no gaps.

QUESTION: And in the last part of – in the last part of her tenure, there was what they cited was another gap in January 2013, which I’m guessing you’re saying is not a gap, in fact.

MR KIRBY: That’s correct.

QUESTION: Can you – they produced an email which showed an official saying there’s a gap or listing it as a gap. Do you understand what happened? Were those emails then later recovered or found?

MR KIRBY: Right. So we continue to maintain there’s no gap. I think you’re talking about this period of December 2012 through the end of January 2013.

QUESTION: Right.

MR KIRBY: And upon further review – so originally when they all came in, a cursory sort of preliminary look, a very quick look at the documents by an official here at the State Department revealed a potential gap of about a month or so in emails. But in going through them in a more fulsome manner after that, we’ve determined that in fact, there was no gap – that that time period is covered quite well by the emails that have been provided. QUESTION: So you have emails from that period and -- MR KIRBY: We do.
QUESTION: -- when you get to that point, they’ll be public.

MR KIRBY: We do, and I think you will continue to see – and we’ve been roughly rolling these out – roughly temporally and you will see – as we get to the remainder of the tranches, that you will see emails that were sent and received during that December ’12 to January ’13 timeframe.
 
Ziggurat said:
17 year old quote. But let's not quibble. The important point is that we need to stop picking on Hillary, it's just so mean.
[qimg]http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1dtDK82-C8o/hqdefault.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Not sure how you got that out of me pointing out something that wasn't really relevant to the the thread, but ok. :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom