Ed clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reheat said:
This is simply another desperate distraction perpetuated by her minions. Whether the information is in the public realm matters not one iota. It's still Classified Information and subject to all of the rules and protection that entails...

For years Aviation Week and Space Technology has published what amounts to Classified Information on new developments from sources unknown. Much of it is speculation and conjecture. However, when any of it is confirmed by a Government Source, that is a BREACH of Classified Information, PERIOD.

This distraction crap aimed at the ignorance of the general public is really getting old...
Click to expand...

The CNN article specifically destroys the spin put out by the Clinton Campaign, and in fact specifically notes that the email included substantial non-public data.

Further, why is it that the Clinton spinmeisters never mention the top secret data about North Korea that ended up on Hillary's cowboy server?
 
wareyin said:
Do you have anything besides conjecture on what was not broadcast?
Click to expand...

Nice attempt at redirection, but it doesn't matter what was not broadcast. The fact that portions of a classified email were not broadcast is sufficient to invalidate your statement that 'this "Top Secret" information had been broadcast on CNN before it was ever forwarded to Clinton'.
 
wareyin said:
I have no idea. Does it? All you guys have is that Clinton was forwarded email containing classified information. The pitiful attempts to pretend this is going to land Clinton in jail, or even force her to withdraw from the race are the obvious spin, here. So, how dizzy are you?
Click to expand...

You are reaching. Again! I've never said any of what you said in above quote! Period! I am quite certain, it is affecting her in the race! No spin here. I leave that all to the Shillaries!:D

Two words: Less caffeine!
 
Hillary emailed her aide on a hotmail account

One of the ridiculous spins that the Campaign wants you to believe is that it was her "practice to email government officials on their official .gov accounts so that her messages were preserved within email archives."

except, of course when she did not:

Hillary Clinton Emailed Aide on Hotmail Account

should have gotten her a clintonemails account Hillary!
 
JohnnyG said:
Nice attempt at redirection, but it doesn't matter what was not broadcast. The fact that portions of a classified email were not broadcast is sufficient to invalidate your statement that 'this "Top Secret" information had been broadcast on CNN before it was ever forwarded to Clinton'.
Click to expand...

A swing and a miss. Portions of the email not being broadcast does not mean that the information that was broadcast was not 'Top Secret'.
 
Dog Town said:
You are reaching. Again! I've never said any of what you said in above quote! Period! I am quite certain, it is affecting her in the race! No spin here. I leave that all to the Shillaries!:D

Two words: Less caffeine!
Click to expand...

Well, if you never said it, obviously it was never said! :rolleyes:
 
16.5 said:
One of the ridiculous spins that the Campaign wants you to believe is that it was her "practice to email government officials on their official .gov accounts so that her messages were preserved within email archives."

except, of course when she did not:

Hillary Clinton Emailed Aide on Hotmail Account

should have gotten her a clintonemails account Hillary!
Click to expand...

For instance, on October 9, 2010, a Saturday, Mrs. Clinton attempted to email Eric Woodard at the State Department, but used the wrong address. She then forwarded that email to her aide Lauren Jiloty to get the correct address.


What would happen if we didn't actually have a record her asking for the correct email address for someone at the state department, so she could email them at their correct state.gov address ? Anarchy ! Chaos !

Well, thank god that record was preserved :rolleyes:
 
TheL8Elvis said:
For instance, on October 9, 2010, a Saturday, Mrs. Clinton attempted to email Eric Woodard at the State Department, but used the wrong address. She then forwarded that email to her aide Lauren Jiloty to get the correct address.


What would happen if we didn't actually have a record her asking for the correct email address for someone at the state department, so she could email them at their correct state.gov address ? Anarchy ! Chaos !

Well, thank god that record was preserved :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Oh heck, it was just one little lie. On her campaign web site. Plus you know the other 10 percent that were also sent outside the system, and the ones she sent to Huma, etc etc etc.

Cool spin, it almost makes me think that Hillary is not a pathological liar
 
wareyin said:
Portions of the email not being broadcast does not mean that the information that was broadcast was not 'Top Secret'.
Click to expand...

Great. We agree that the email contained classified information even though portions were already known to the public. Hillary did receive and store classified information on her private server.
 
JohnnyG said:
Great. We agree that the email contained classified information even though portions were already known to the public. Hillary did receive and store classified information on her private server.
Click to expand...
You seem to be admitting that information that has been broadcast to the public can still be classified. Am I correct in understanding that?
 
wareyin said:
You seem to be admitting that information that has been broadcast to the public can still be classified. Am I correct in understanding that?
Click to expand...

That's exactly what the article you linked to said. It cited a court case to that effect.

Regardless, the issue of how serious the practice of Clinton sending and receiving classified emails on an unsecured system is not known at this time. Per force, attempting to defend or criticize the practice based only on what is publicly available is problematic. First not all the emails have been reviewed, and secondly the nature of the classified material on the servers is not going to be unambiguously identified in public.

In the end, the emails will be reviewed by the appropriate people and organizations and a report will be written. After that she may or may not face legal problems for her actions with regard to her handling of classified material.

Right now, you might notice that HuffingtonPost republished a FactCheck.org article on the issue of Clinton's emails and it is clear that all is not rosy. Neither HuffingtonPost nor FactCheck.org are rightwing sites that reasonably enough don't have much credibility when it comes to an issue like this.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clintons-email_55f028efe4b03784e2772991

On another topic:
Has there been any coverage about whether the other people that used Clinton's HCS submitted their emails for archiving?
 
wareyin said:
You seem to be admitting that information that has been broadcast to the public can still be classified. Am I correct in understanding that?
Click to expand...

Although that may actually be true, it is not what I am saying. I'm saying that public knowledge of part of the information in an email does not invalidate the classified status of the entire email.

You have attempted to marginalize the classified nature of the emails because they "contained "classified information" that had already been broadcast on CNN". That argument rings hollow knowing some of the information was not broadcast.
 
JohnnyG said:
Although that may actually be true, it is not what I am saying. I'm saying that public knowledge of part of the information in an email does not invalidate the classified status of the entire email.

You have attempted to marginalize the classified nature of the emails because they "contained "classified information" that had already been broadcast on CNN". That argument rings hollow knowing some of the information was not broadcast.
Click to expand...

I can't believe you had to explain that! Your patience with Shillaries is epic!:thumbsup:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom