Shalamar
Dark Lord of the JREF
It's allowed for republicans. Because reasons.
I am wondering, after 31 pages, did anyone figure out who this Eric Hoteham character is yet?
No, it was simply a misspelling of the person's name. You might want to pay better attention to your thread, in particular the factual aspects.Yes, it was a pseudonym for Hillary's cowboy server wrangler.
There was a similarly named guy who worked for Slick Willy.
This, folks, is also the ve
Avid readers of this thread will surely recognize the severe and advanced case of Hillary/Cowboy Server Derangement Syndrome. It's like watching an eight-year-old pepper his arguments with "Poopie-Head" every other sentence.
Next I'll do "handlers" and "LOLOL!".
Top-notch reporting indeed.
That, folks is the very definition of got nothin.
/assuming he can read my sig, it seems pretty clear he doesn't understand it!![]()
No, it was simply a misspelling of the person's name. You might want to pay better attention to your thread, in particular the factual aspects.
No, it was simply a misspelling of the person's name. You might want to pay better attention to your thread, in particular the factual aspects.
I'll revisit this goofy claim later on today, time allowing.You are dealing with the Clintons here, friendo.
If it was intentionally garbled it is a psuedonym. Which it was.
Huh? I consider it a friendly when people point out my mistakes. Granted, I make mistakes about as often as the earth's polarity changes, but still...Rabid Hillary partisans are always so friendly!
Huh? I consider it a friendly when people point out my mistakes.
His actual name is Eric Hothem. To call the misspelling a pseudonym is positively laughable. And yet you proclaim it as unvarnished fact.You are dealing with the Clintons here, friendo.
If it was intentionally garbled it is a psuedonym. Which it was.
Plus he was gone from there, so (follow along with me) the name became the pseudonym for whichever cowboy ran the server after Eric moved on. Plus, the original Eric neither lived in the Clinton mansion nor actually owned the websites. It was a fake name.
You are dealing with the Clintons here, friendo.
If it was intentionally garbled it is a psuedonym. Which it was.
Plus he was gone from there, so (follow along with me) the name became the pseudonym for whichever cowboy ran the server after Eric moved on. Plus, the original Eric neither lived in the Clinton mansion nor actually owned the websites. It was a fake name...
Following up, if Clinton and/or Hothem wanted to conceal Hothem's involvement, they could have...His actual name is Eric Hothem. To call the misspelling a pseudonym is positively laughable. And yet you proclaim it as unvarnished fact.
Clinton and Hothem are the most inept concealers in the history of concealment
Following up, if Clinton and/or Hothem wanted to conceal Hothem's involvement, they could have...
* Registered anonymously using a 3rd party service. This is a standard up-sell feature any time you register a domain. (Or at least it was the many times I registered domains.)
* Registered under the name of someone not publicly associated with the Clintons
* Used a fake name that isn't Hothem save for one letter (what a concept)
On top of which, Clinton was part of the domain name. On top of which, the motivation to conceal Hothem's involvement eludes me entirely.
Clinton and Hothem are the most inept concealers in the history of concealment, in the world according to 16.5.
You want on-topic? Then stop avoiding my questions.Anything to add about the subject matter of the thread, or ya just gonna whine about the big dog?
You want on-topic? Then stop avoiding my questions.
For 16.5 and allies I have two questions:
1) Does this "controversy" make HRC unqualified for the presidency?
2) Is there any serious policy issue associated with this incident?
So is your butthurt. You posted utter nonsense, and got your ass handed to you.
That makes me the bad guy or something.
Anything to add about the subject matter of the thread, or ya just gonna whine about the big dog?
Yeah, they are. Clinton emails.com you kidding?
She is not connecting and having conversations with the little people. Shame. She does not seem like a total psycho.![]()
You know we can all see you dodging questions and ignoring arguments, right ?
I, for one, certainly can. But perhaps there is this vast, but silent audience out there that agrees with 16.5 that can't see the dodges and unanswered questions?You know we can all see you dodging questions and ignoring arguments, right ?
For 16.5 and allies I have two questions:
1) Does this "controversy" make HRC unqualified for the presidency?
2) Is there any serious policy issue associated with this incident?