Ed clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham?

Status
Not open for further replies.
TheL8Elvis said:
It "appears that the non-disclosures was orchestrated ... the Obama administration" because "Issa believes the White House coordinated the collective response"

Conspiracies everywhere you look ! OMG!
Click to expand...

Weird.... You cut out the part that said the responses were virtually identical.

At least you address the articles, though. You are a breath of fresh air
 
16.5 said:
We know that Hillary and the State Department failed to tell the Congress that she exclusively used her own private cowboy server, but it appears that the non-disclosures was orchestrated not only by Hillary and State, but also the Obama administration.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/04/15/what-darrell-issa-thinks-of-state-departments-response-to-his-question-on-hillary-clintons-emails/

Ugh, the more you hear about these clowns the more showers you want to take.
Click to expand...
I don't see anything of the sort. Can you quote the pertinent text?
 
varwoche said:
I don't see anything of the sort. Can you quote the pertinent text?
Click to expand...

The March response from the federal agencies was nearly identical, signed by different government staffers, Issa said. Issa believes the White House coordinated the collective response.
 
16.5 said:
actually, they ignore the article and mostly attack me.

Kind of like you just did.
Click to expand...
You are very quick to claim you are being attacked. In the times you have made that claim, have you reported the post?

16.5 said:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/04/15/what-darrell-issa-thinks-of-state-departments-response-to-his-question-on-hillary-clintons-emails/
Click to expand...
The Blaze? Glen (Bonkers) Beck? Really? He has zero credibility for anything beyond what color the sky is.

16.5 said:
Issa believes the White House coordinated the collective response.
Click to expand...
And Issa's credibility is worse than Becks. He checks under his bed at night to see if the dust bunnies have joined the communist party.

Really 16.5, finding some believable sources to back up your claims would do you a wonder of good.
 
I'm not sure why anybody should care that Hillary was uncooperative with what she surely knew was a witchhunt. Why would she? Republicans will keep searching for their silver bullet either way.
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
The March response from the federal agencies was nearly identical, signed by different government staffers, Issa said. Issa believes the White House coordinated the collective response.
Click to expand...
You have not posted evidence to support this.

Your post that I previously responded to is highly misleading. I don't much enjoy chasing wild geese, so I won't be following any more of your links unless they are accompanied by a supporting quote from the source.
 
SezMe said:
The Blaze? Glen (Bonkers) Beck? Really? He has zero credibility for anything beyond what color the sky is.
Click to expand...
If Beck reported blue skies, I'd check the regional weather report.

And Issa's credibility is worse than Becks. He checks under his bed at night to see if the dust bunnies have joined the communist party.

Really 16.5, finding some believable sources to back up your claims would do you a wonder of good.
Click to expand...
To be clear, there was nothing in the linked article supporting 16.5's claim. The link was a non seq.
 
varwoche said:
If Beck reported blue skies, I'd check the regional weather report.

To be clear, there was nothing in the linked article supporting 16.5's claim. The link was a non seq.
Click to expand...

This happens a lot. Often enough that, like you, without an actual quote I see no reason to continue clicking 16.5's links.
 
varwoche said:
You have not posted evidence to support this.

Your post that I previously responded to is highly misleading. I don't much enjoy chasing wild geese, so I won't be following any more of your links unless they are accompanied by a supporting quote from the source.
Click to expand...

I directly quoted the article that I linked. I am utterly baffled by what exactly your objection is.
 
Tony Stark said:
I'm not sure why anybody should care that Hillary was uncooperative with what she surely knew was a witchhunt. Why would she? Republicans will keep searching for their silver bullet either way.
Click to expand...

I understand that you are willing to accept Hillary's coverup.
 
16.5 said:
The March response from the federal agencies was nearly identical, signed by different government staffers, Issa said. Issa believes the White House coordinated the collective response.
Click to expand...

Folks this is an actual quote from the article, which should have been utterly blindingly obvious had anyone actually read the article before complaining about it.
 
Mea culpa, I didn't see that.

Providing quotes is good practice anyway.
 
Last edited:
Tony Stark said:
Refusing to cooperate in a partisan witch hunt against yourself ins't a coverup.
Click to expand...

If asking whether the top employees in Administrative Agencies use personal emails is a "partisan witch hunt," you might as well shut down the system of checks and balances this Country has had for over 200 years.
 
I hear tell that the New York Times who broke this story and has been following it up (to their credit) is part of the "right wing echo chamber."

Love to hear a little bit more about that.

Any takers?
 
So did Gowdy talk to Hillary and get all his email questions answered ?

Haven't heard much about this "scandal" lately ...

In the meantime, enjoy this patriotic photo of trey gowdy:
 
plague311 said:
This thread has dissolved to nothing. I haven't seen any really stimulating conversation in awhile. 16.5 blurts out how horrible Hillary is, a bunch of other people make it clear that it's not as bad as he points out, then we wait for 16.5 to find another article somewhere.

The New York Times might be right but, just like all the other right wing "scandals", all the noise came early. Now no one really cares anymore
Click to expand...

All true (except for the NY Times article I didn't read it and don't have an opinion) but there is a certain kind of charm to the thread.

I have been curious for awhile about why an apparently intelligent person such as 16.5 thinks this is so important. If Hillary is a sleazoid, does this mean his overall ideology is more likely to be correct? If politicians that he aligns himself with do something similar does that mean his overall ideology is less likely to be correct?

Is this all about justifying the partisan witch hunt that the Clinton's have been enduring for years by proving that Clinton is a sleazoid and therefore apparently deserves being the subject of a witch hunt?

What has been clear for awhile, is that even putting the worst spin on this story possible about Clinton, most people see sabotaging peace agreements for partisan political purposes as far worse, so this little kerfuffle isn't all that significant to the likelihood that one would vote for one of the lust for war Republicans over Clinton.

And what is painfully obvious is that the exact nature of the culpability of Clinton with regard to this story is unknowable. She deleted a bunch of emails that legally she had every right to delete. Were there a few emails mixed in there that she didn't have the legal right to delete? Probably no one will ever know. There are reasons to believe that she probably didn't illegally delete very many of her emails related to her job as Secretary of State since it would have been a dicey exercise knowing that email to a recipient might surface that she illegally deleted, so a pretty reasonable guess is that if she did any illegal deleting it wasn't a lot.

But of course, the Republicans will continue to drag this little kerfuffle along hoping that it scores gets a little traction beyond the true believer crowd that thinks it's so important. At least it's given them a new excuse to shout Benghazi a few more times and I'm sure they're happy about that.
 
TheL8Elvis said:
So did Gowdy talk to Hillary and get all his email questions answered ?

Haven't heard much about this "scandal" lately ...

In the meantime, enjoy this patriotic photo of trey gowdy:
Click to expand...

Odd, I got criticized for posting new developments and now people are complaining there are no new developments? Baffling.

No, The Special Committee requested an interview by May 1. Do I think that Hillary will voluntarily comply? Of course not.

Cool picture tho! :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom