It didn't strike me as a sincere question, especially since I never predicted an undesirable outcome. But, just to be helpful, I'll point out that being forced to answer questions under oath is pretty bad for somebody like Hillary. Liars do not like being put under oath. She's pretty weaselly, and since her responses will be written, she'll have the help of the best of the best at lying under oath, but, still, I expect it to be a mucho uncomfortable experience for her.
And, contrary to your claim, Justice Watch can force her to respond before the election, and perhaps before she knows just which of her "personal" emails the FBI has recovered. She might be forced to assume the worst and be forced to spin a tale that just barely keeps her inside the law but hurts her electoral chances.
We'll see I suppose. I certainly don't see any point in gloating about it. There's far too much of that around here.
) and it was used on her server. A server, mind you, that she never worked on personally, outside of using it's email services. I mean, c'mon, we were told best practice is to do it 7 times and destroy the physical metal disks afterwards. She was conniving, and thoughtful enough to destroy those emails that she "doesn't want God" to read, yet didn't destroy the others? WTF? Worst criminal ever. Not to mention, she wasn't in physical control of her servers when they were taken by the FBI. Hell, big dog couldn't shut up about that no more than 6 months ago. So at best the program was used on old, none used hard drives that were left in, what I would assume, was the shell of the physical server the FBI picked up. That would mean that whoever decommissioned the server did exactly what they were supposed to do and wrote over the hard drives. Probably got paid to do it, and used an open source program. Wow, mountain out of a mole hill.
