Ed Clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham Part 3

[plague311]

Are you saying she hasn't lied about this? Where to begin...Here's a fresh one:

"It was allowed," referring to her email practices."
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/statements/?page=2

I'm not sure if you're aware but there is some room between "she lies about everything" and "she's never lied about this." Take your time and see if you can find it. Then again, maybe knee jerk reactions to statements is your go-to.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/27/e...jiv-fernando-asked-to-be-on-state-dept-panel/

Don't worry though, Clinton assures us those donations don't affect her

Conspiracy Theories is that way ===>

That's where you can deposit accusations with absolutely no supporting evidence.

 

[TheL8Elvis]

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/27/e...jiv-fernando-asked-to-be-on-state-dept-panel/

Don't worry though, Clinton assures us those donations don't affect her

You might want to check your sig and think about the fallacy you just made..

 

[Skeptic Ginger]

...With malice aforethought, Hillary sets up an elaborate, fully independent system for communication while she's in charge of the country's entire diplomatic apparatus, the sole purpose of which was to evade all of the constraints on governmental secrecy developed in law over the previous 50 years, and you don't understand the point? What do you think the punishment for such behavior should be? Perhaps something that discourages such behavior in the future?

Elaborate? The server was already in use by the Clinton's in 2008.

Malice? Sole purpose to evade? Previous 50 years?????

 

[Fudbucker]

I'm not sure if you're aware but there is some room between "she lies about everything" and "she's never lied about this." Take your time and see if you can find it. Then again, maybe knee jerk reactions to statements is your go-to.

So you admit she has lied about this. It was unclear from your diatribe what you were saying. Do you also admit she's lied multiple times about these emails?

Do these lies she tells bother you? Do you trust what she says anymore? If so, why?

 

[Fudbucker]

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/27/e...jiv-fernando-asked-to-be-on-state-dept-panel/



Don't worry though, Clinton assures us those donations don't affect her

No, no, no! It's a right-wing conspiracy ABCnews story that a major Clinton campaign donor was placed in a political position he was totally unqualified for.

"Newly released State Department emails help reveal how a major Clinton Foundation donor was placed on a sensitive government intelligence advisory board even though he had no obvious experience in the field, a decision that appeared to baffle the department’s professional staff.

The emails further reveal how, after inquiries from ABC News, the Clinton staff sought to “protect the name” of the Secretary, “stall” the ABC News reporter and ultimately accept the resignation of the donor just two days later."
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-donor-sensitive-intelligence-board/story?id=39710624

See? Conspiracy theory nonsense.

 

[The_Animus]

Conspiracy Theories is that way ===>

That's where you can deposit accusations with absolutely no supporting evidence.

You being uninformed about something doesn't make it conspiracy. This guy had no reason to be placed where he was. None. Except that he donated to Clinton and her Foundation and he asked for it.

Unless you're saying she would have gotten him that spot even without the donation?

 

[The Big Dog]

More previously unproduced emails show Hillary already brain dead in 2009?

“I have just realized I have no idea how my papers are treated at State. Who manages both my personal and official files?” Clinton asked deputies Huma Abedin and Lauren Jiloty.

“So, I think we need to get on this asap to be sure we know and design the system we want.”

In response, Abedin said she and other officials had “discussed this” and would talk with Clinton about it later in the day.
No **** Huma, you set up an entire system to shield Hillary's communications from FOIA and Congress.

what a freaking mook.

 

[DavidJames]

Nixon resigned to spend more time with his family. The whole thing was totally blown out of proportion, don't you agree?

This needs to stand alone.

 

[The Big Dog]

This needs to stand alone.

WHOOOOOSH!

 

[The Big Dog]

More previously unproduced emails show Hillary already brain dead in 2009?

“I have just realized I have no idea how my papers are treated at State. Who manages both my personal and official files?” Clinton asked deputies Huma Abedin and Lauren Jiloty.

“So, I think we need to get on this asap to be sure we know and design the system we want.”

In response, Abedin said she and other officials had “discussed this” and would talk with Clinton about it later in the day.
No **** Huma, you set up an entire system to shield Hillary's communications from FOIA and Congress.

what a freaking mook.

With the new release Monday, more than 50 work-related emails sent or received by Clinton have since surfaced that were not among those she provided.

 

[sunmaster14]

Nixon resigned to spend more time with his family. The whole thing was totally blown out of proportion, don't you agree?

This

This needs to stand alone.

 

[Meadmaker]

We won't necessarily get to see what the FBI uncovers. The attorney general will decide that.

To amplify on the previous post, I was cured of belief in any sort of conspiracy theories a long time ago.

Either the FBI probe will uncover significant (i.e. worthy of mention) wrongdoing, or it will not. If it does, you could convince me that the AG would sit on it. That's not out of the question. However, if she did that, the people who actually put together the report that detailed the wrongdoing won't stand for it. It will be leaked.

Or, they won't find anything worthy of mention.

 

[Meadmaker]

With malice aforethought, Hillary sets up an elaborate, fully independent system for communication while she's in charge of the country's entire diplomatic apparatus, the sole purpose of which was to evade all of the constraints on governmental secrecy developed in law over the previous 50 years, and you don't understand the point?

I'm not alone. There are an awful lot of people who don't understand the point. Indeed, an awful lot of Republicans don't understand the point.

Your nominee seems to understand the point, but I'm pretty sure he's crazy. The "establishment" (i.e. sane) wing of your party hasn't made much of this.

What do you think the punishment for such behavior should be? Perhaps something that discourages such behavior in the future?

Cut 10% from her Presidential pension.

 

[Meadmaker]

Not sure what that has to do with Hillary's email problems.

You referred to me as a "Hillary fan". I'm not. If there were somebody better to vote for, I would vote for someone besides Hillary. Instead, there's Trump.

 

[sunmaster14]

You referred to me as a "Hillary fan". I'm not. If there were somebody better to vote for, I would vote for someone besides Hillary. Instead, there's Trump.

I'm pretty sure I never did this.

 

[Meadmaker]

I'm pretty sure I never did this.

Sorry. My mistake. The post I made, that you quoted, was in response to a post that called me a "Hillary fan", but that post was from 16.5, not you.

 

[Fudbucker]

Sorry. My mistake. The post I made, that you quoted, was in response to a post that called me a "Hillary fan", but that post was from 16.5, not you.

You're not a "hillary fan" and you're one of the more reasonable people posting here. In fact, I look at your reaction to anything as a sort of barometer to what most Americans who are interested in politics feel about all this.

 

[Childlike Empress]

You're not a "hillary fan" and you're one of the more reasonable people posting here. In fact, I look at your reaction to anything as a sort of barometer to what most Americans who are interested in politics feel about all this.

But he just seems to have insinuated that sunmaster14 is a Trump supporter and a Republican, which I doubt are true statements and look like a quid-pro-quo for the admitted misattributed "Hillary fan". So make sure to stay on the high road, Meadmaker.

Your nominee seems to understand the point, but I'm pretty sure he's crazy. The "establishment" (i.e. sane) wing of your party hasn't made much of this.

 

[Meadmaker]

But he just seems to have insinuated that sunmaster14 is a Trump supporter and a Republican, which I doubt are true statements and look like a quid-pro-quo for the admitted misattributed "Hillary fan". So make sure to stay on the high road, Meadmaker.

I am assuming that Sunmaster14 generally votes Republican. I don't see any reason to believe that he is a "Trump fan". However, if I am mistaken on either point, I would accept any correction.

 

[AlaskaBushPilot]

50 little emails, lol. Wikileaks is about to dump a truckload of the very things most dear to Crooked Hillary, that the public musn't know. We're about to visit some of the 30,000 and more emails Hillary assures us were weddings and recipes, birthday wishes, etc.

It's a world record - how Bill and Hillary went from broke to worth half a billion dollars order of magnitude.

We didn't have things like Wikileaks before. In the past we had Bill and Hillary lying, destroying evidence, and having powerful insiders protecting them.

Assange is staid in his statement about proof of indictable offences. One thing about Wikileaks is their reliability on such statements. It is going to be amusing, in a morbid kind of way, watching the train wreck of apologists after this next release.

It can finally be about the CONTENT of her conduct in office, like the busy little bee creating ISIS for Saudi Arabian Billionaire Wahabbist princes. As just an example.