macdoc
Philosopher
Outlines the urgency and scale of the issues at Copenhagen..
http://blogs.nature.com/climatefeedback/
Countdown to Copenhagen
Keith Kloor
It seems like yesterday when everyone was downplaying expectations for success at next week’s climate summit in Copenhagen. Not anymore. Nicholas Stern writes in the Guardian:
“Given what is at stake, essentially the future peace and prosperity of the planet, world leaders must now recognise that Copenhagen is the most important international gathering of our time. A strong political agreement can and must be reached in Copenhagen. There can be no excuses for failure.”Although a legally binding treaty has been taken off the table, Bill McKibben over at Yale Environment 360 takes stock of the thorny issues that still need to be resolved to reach any such political agreement. Among them:
“How do you draw something up that doesn’t require treaty approval by the U.S. Senate (no one thinks there are 67 votes for a real climate policy)? How do you give credit for actions already taken? How do you keep carbon trading from turning into one more Wall Street boondoggle?”James Hansen, for his part, continues to insist that cap and trade is an “inefficient compromise” and that governments going to Copenhagen are “lying through their teeth” if they say otherwise. In Grist, Hansen writes that climate negotiators need to solve one main equation:
“Unless they order Russia to leave its gas in the ground and Saudi Arabia to leave its oil in the ground (which nobody has proposed), they must phase out coal and prohibit unconventional fossil fuels.”Over on Scientific American, physicist Myles Allen of the University of Oxford, concurs:
"Any credible plan for avoiding dangerous climate change will have to address the question of what India, China, Russia and the U.S. are going to do with the coal they have underground that we cannot afford for them to release into the atmosphere. If they are not going to use that coal, ever, then who is going to compensate them for the benefits lost? And if they are going to use it, then who is going to pay for its carbon content to be sequestered?”Continue reading "Countdown to Copenhagen " »
http://blogs.nature.com/climatefeedback/