• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

CIT.....Time to call it a day

What? Some of us can't see the stupidity directly (I'm banned).

20080610152736qb4.jpg
 
“That is a clear sign of victory when your opponent has to resort to insults and personal attacks.”

Waldo posted that six minutes after he called you “JREF scum”! What a spectacular failure those guys are.


Yeah, but that's not an insult, it's an accurate description!




Okay, well, now it's an accurate description!


The idea of vectored thrust providing multiple g of maneuver in something the size of a 757 beggars the imagination. At that point, rather than crash the Pentagon, you may as well hover over it and melt it into a puddle...


Ah, yes, the Kzinti Lesson.
 

:D I wasn't thinking of the Angel's Pencil when I wrote that, but the analogy is apt...

In more general terms, this is yet another example of a conspiracy theory so complicated and crazy, even if we ignore the utter lack of support, it's simply not worth even considering. The cost and risk involved with such an exotic aircraft would automatically consign this plan to the trash heap. Such a technologically sophisticated group of conspirators could easily come up with a better plan.
 
I see JFK is finally showing an ounce of neutrality and giving SPreston warnings.
 
Amazing. I get suspended by JFK (without any warning) for merely suggesting that Aldo is participating in a deception, yet here's JFK himself within hours saying to Reheat:

Sorry, but your paper appears to be deliberate and intentional disinfo

Thier double standards are incredible.
 
Well, in anticipation of the CIT's new cherry picking, this morning I went through the actual transcripts of the CIT's ANC witnesses.

I am amazed at the brazen misrepresentations that the CIT is publishing.

For the band member, you may note that the frauds claim she was talking about a fly over. The CIT frauds intentionally delete the fact that she was clearly talking about a fighter squadren doing an honorary fly over in the "missing man" formation as a tribute during burials. (See page 7) http://aal77.com/cmh_foia/neit567.pdf

Next they claim that another witness said that the plane went over the ANC parking lot. More misrepresentations from the CIT! He was clearly talking about the Pentagon parking lot and flat out said that the plane was 800 feet away, the distance the Pentagon was from his window! (Page 6). http://aal77.com/cmh_foia/neit419.pdf

These guys are pathetic. Oh, by the way, they all said AA77 hit the pentagon.
 
Last edited:
Well, in anticipation of the CIT's new cherry picking, this morning I went through the actual transcripts of the CIT's ANC witnesses.

I am amazed at the brazen misrepresentations that the CIT is publishing.

For the band member, you may note that the frauds claim she was talking about a fly over. The CIT frauds intentionally delete the fact that she was clearly talking about a fighter squadren doing an honorary fly over in the "missing man" formation as a tribute during burials. (See page 7)

Next they claim that another witness said that the plane went over the ANC parking lot. More misrepresentations from the CIT! He was clearly talking about the Pentagon parking lot and flat out said that the plane was 800 feet away, the distance the Pentagon was from his window! (Page 6).

These guys are pathetic. Oh, by the way, they all said AA77 hit the pentagon.

Don't forget that Keith Wheelhouse was binned after the concluded he didn't have a good view (they "showed" his location but it was further back than the X he explicitly drew on the map marking his position). NEIT567 is even further away than the bogus location they said Wheelhouse was at, and her view is obscured by all manner of trees and buildings.

And get this, because she only heard the imact and thought it was on the other side of the Pentagon, that somehow makes here a NoC witness *and* a flyover witness.
 
Ok, I'm back in the battle at the Detractors section at the CIT forum. Aldo's already come in for a bite.
 
Ok, I'm back in the battle at the Detractors section at the CIT forum. Aldo's already come in for a bite.

I was surprised; they actually had a decent answer to my question about why the blast didn't destroy the plane.

I haven't been back there since. I dunno, Aldo just scares me. Every time he posts it feels like he's going to jump through my computer screen and eat me. :D
 
What? Some of us can't see the stupidity directly (I'm banned).

Oh, it's just very typical CiT 'just-wait-for-it.-super-duper-stuff-coming.-here-it-comes-its-gonna-blow-your-socks-off.-just-wait-gonna-release-it-soon' enormous build up for what has always turned out to be cherry picking and misrepresentation.

Amazingly it is Aldo who just cannot fathom how very wrong he is. Maybe its transference on a subconcious level on his part.
 
Last edited:
Things are looking very bad for CIT (But what's new?)

I just spoke to Levi Stephens.

Thank you. I was unaware that they had posted my picture and aligned my story with their theory.

Edit: And it didn't take long for Levi to do something about it. They've already taken his picture down from Topic 9 - Additional 2 North Side Witnesses.
 
Last edited:
Things are looking very bad for CIT (But what's new?)

I just spoke to Levi Stephens.

Thank you. I was unaware that they had posted my picture and aligned my story with their theory.

Edit: And it didn't take long for Levi to do something about it. They've already taken his picture down from Topic 9 - Additional 2 North Side Witnesses.
DETAILS PLEASE
 
I don't have many more details other than how I found him, and he's not really talkative on the subject.

Last night I emailed him to let him know that CIT were using his story and picture to support their theory. This morning when I woke up I had a reply from him that contained the above quote and now his picture is missing from their website.

I can't post links yet, but it's in the info section titled 2 additional north side witnesses revealed! and dated Friday, November 30, 2007.

Luckily I saved a copy of the page last night that still has his photo on it.
 
Last edited:
I don't have many more details other than how I found him, and he's not really talkative on the subject.

Last night I emailed him to let him know that CIT were using his story and picture to support their theory. This morning when I woke up I had a reply from him that contained the above quote and now his picture is missing from their website.

I can't post links yet, but it's in the info section titled 2 additional north side witnesses revealed! and dated Friday, November 30, 2007.

Luckily I saved a copy of the page last night that still have his photo on it.
Ahh...I must remember to rub the noses of all members past and present of the abomination known as Clueless Investigoogle Team in it just like (look Dylan, a simile) you housetrain a dog by rubbing it's nose in it's poo.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom