CIT.....Time to call it a day

Yes indeed, where are those flyover witnesses? After almost 900 posts on this thread still no answer.

In addition, if there was a flyover, where did the plane eventually land? You would think that if a 757 just made an unexpected landing at the wrong airport someone would take notice. Is the entire FAA "in on" a flyover?

OMG that's it! It never landed. It's a ghost plane still flying around like that Dutchman...
 
HAHA!

I just logged back into Loose Change Forums after my suspension came to an end.. One of the first things I found on there was a quote from Dom...

Domenick DiMaggio said:
Did Boger actually state he did not move and watched the plane actually fly into the building?
Well, yes he did. Oops!

But in his very next sentence he is already spinning out of control...
Domenick DiMaggio said:
It seems to me natural instinct would be to try to take cover in some manner or another instead of watching it especially if it appeared it was coming right at him.
And there's the truth movement in a nutshell.

Ignorant and idiotic.

ETA - NEIT299 (http://www.aal77.com/cmh_foia/neit299.pdf) whom Craig Ranke identified as Sean Boger, had the following to say in a CMH interview, Nov 14 2001, 2 months after the incident.

[Redacted {Ranke identifies as Boger}] And so I am looking out at the road, and I see the traffic has liked stop, and I look out the window and I just hear a -- I just see like the nose and the wing of an aircraft just like coming right at us, and he didn't veer. And then you just heard the noise, and then he just smacked into the building, and when it hit the building, I am watching the plane go all the way into the building.
[Redacted {Interviewer}] Oh, my gosh.
[Sean Boger] So once the plane went into the building, it exploded, and once it exploded, I hit the floor and just covered up my head. It was like glass shattering and ceiling tile was falling, and --
[Interviewer] It is amazing that you reacted that quickly.
[Sean Boger] I know, and I think that a lot of it had to do with the actual impact of the plane, because when it exploded, it kind of shook our building. So it shook our building, and from there --
[Interviewer] You went down anyway
[Sean Boger] Yes, instinct, and I hit the ground because you know we are surrounded by glass.
 
Last edited:
And in addition to where the plane landed, how about some information on what happened to the 64 persons on board American Airlines Flight 77?

Were they:

1. Government agents (including the eight passengers under age 18) in on the flyover plot who now live on that island from "Lost"?

2. Rubbed out by the real bad guys after the plane landed, then had samples of the their DNA taken, which of course was then planted in the wreckage of the Pentagon when no one was looking?
 
Boger also says the traffic was stopped. This would probably mean lots of traffic and a jam of some sort. A lot of them would see the plane and the lamposts. They would definately see the funny guys with white vans planting the poles on the road while removing the ones that were there already.

This is a one man Dumb and Dumber thread.
 
Dom is still here?

Cripes, anyway, why are we talking about Boger at this point?

Did Lyte ever release Boger's statement? I think he has refused to do so.

Given the fact that this very thread has demonstrated that the CIT is grossly incompetent in understanding witness statements, and because we know that Lyte and Waldo have intentionally misrepresented witness statements before (see the ANC band witness "missing man" formation flyover comment) the bottom line is that no one should trust one damn thing they said in their hearsay reports.

Don't ask us if Boger changed his statement, Dom, prove he said it in the first place. Release the full statement or STFU
 
OK. I have moved a batch of posts out of this thread for bickering, incivility, personalising the discussion and being off topic. Please keep threads friendly. If I need to revisit this thread it will be closed, moderated, or moved to AAH.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
what plane peeled away [Sucherman] from the Pentagon 3-5 seconds [Sucherman] after the explosion took place that was witnessed by Officer Roberts 3-5 seconds after the explosion which he described as a silver double engine commercial airliner and definitely not a C130 with 4 propellers?
 
dom, where are your flyover witnesses? how many times must this be asked of you?
 
Lets not degenerate into bickering

TC329 said:
what plane peeled away [Sucherman] from the Pentagon 3-5 seconds [Sucherman] after the explosion took place that was witnessed by Officer Roberts 3-5 seconds after the explosion which he described as a silver double engine commercial airliner and definitely not a C130 with 4 propellers?
Sucherman likely saw the C130, Officer Roberts account is confusing and seems to indicate he saw AA77.
 
And in addition to where the plane landed, how about some information on what happened to the 64 persons on board American Airlines Flight 77?

Were they:

1. Government agents (including the eight passengers under age 18) in on the flyover plot who now live on that island from "Lost"?

2. Rubbed out by the real bad guys after the plane landed, then had samples of the their DNA taken, which of course was then planted in the wreckage of the Pentagon when no one was looking?

Some of Craigs wild speculation has included
1. The passengers were gassed
2. They landed in Ohio and executed by the government.

He says this with a straight face
 
Last edited:
what plane peeled away [Sucherman] from the Pentagon 3-5 seconds [Sucherman] after the explosion took place that was witnessed by Officer Roberts 3-5 seconds after the explosion which he described as a silver double engine commercial airliner and definitely not a C130 with 4 propellers?

[sucherman]
  • First off, he doesn't give a 3-5 second ballpark time in his statement
  • He does not describe the type of plane he saw (referring to the 2nd plane)

Source
1:01-1:19

"...then there was another plane that uhh, was off to the uh, off to the south west, and that made a b-line straight up into the sky and then angled off and we were'nt sure if that was gonna come around and make another hit, or if it was just trying to get out of the way. That disappeared and we didn't see it again."

Says nothing about direction except when referring to his vantage point, says nothing about the amount of time after the flight 77 strike to indicate a frame of reference. Instead, he states he was unsure if it was part of the attack or if it was another plane trying to get out of the area. Nothing indicates in his testimony the the 2nd plane flew 'over' the Pentagon
 
Dom,
Has the CIT investigated the possibility that Flight 77 pulled up BUT then immediately morphed and turned into pentagon roofing material?
 
Dom,
Has the CIT investigated the possibility that Flight 77 pulled up BUT then immediately morphed and turned into pentagon roofing material?

That would explain everything. Everything.
 

Back
Top Bottom