• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

CIT presentation in Arlington VA

roundhead said:
Only here would anybody believe those who saw nothing, and disbelieve 14 people who said the plane was on an entirely different flight path...

Only here
Click to expand...

Really? Only here?

Please provide evidence that anyone, anywhere outside of the CIT Cult has been convinced by this nonsense.
 
FineWine said:
CIT is not open to reality. Its goal is to absolve the Islamist terrorists and frame innocent Americans.
Click to expand...


No, all they want to do is get after the truth.

The 14 witnesses are extremely uncomfortable to the official lie.

Believe they arent lying about a very simple detail, and the whole OCT goes right where it rightfully belongs, in a garbage can that JREF continues to toss through for tidbits to munch on
 
Are they sending out special invitations to the witnesses? It would surely give much credence to their presentation if they could have some of the 14 witnesses attend and give their support. If the presentation is using their own words from recorded interviews, I think it would be common courtesy to invite them to participate, especially since the talk will be in their neighborhood.
 
roundhead said:
No, all they want to do is get after the truth.

The 14 witnesses are extremely uncomfortable to the official lie.

Believe they arent lying about a very simple detail, and the whole OCT goes right where it rightfully belongs, in a garbage can that JREF continues to toss through for tidbits to munch on
Click to expand...


They are incredibly stupid liars.

The fourteen witnesses all agree that the plane hit the Pentagon. Nobody saw the imaginary flyover.


Tell us about the witness who is "uncomfortable." Does he have a name?
 
Mangoose said:
Are they sending out special invitations to the witnesses? It would surely give much credence to their presentation if they could have some of the 14 witnesses attend and give their support. If the presentation is using their own words from recorded interviews, I think it would be common courtesy to invite them to participate, especially since the talk will be in their neighborhood.
Click to expand...



Boy, look up deny in the dictionary, and there you are...


"their own words and voices":D:D:D


So if those are their own words and voices then we can confidently state the OCt is a lie, correct??
 
roundhead said:
...
And 14 eyewitnesses interviewed on site and on camera stating the plane flew a course that would have with 100% certainty not been on a path to strike the poles.....
...
Click to expand...
On camera years, YEARS, after 911.
The best part is the morons at CIT do not tell you the 14 witnesses believe 77 impacted the Pentagon and hit the lampposts. So you have the Citizen Idiot Team make up lies.

CIT leaves out the many witnesses who saw 77 impact the pentagon, hit lampposts and fly to the south. In fact all the witnesses of CIT point on camera to the south flight path. LOL; did you look at what the morons put on video? They refute their own moronic conclusion. They all point to the south.

Their own witness saw 77 impact the Pentagon. Oops.

The path CIT says happen is physically impossible to fly. Good for you picking the biggest idiots to support with your evidence free delusions.
 
roundhead said:
I dont honestly expect you to be able to figure anything out...so your off the hook..........
Click to expand...

Dodge noted.

No one has been convinced by CIT's insanity, and you are unable to provide evidence to the contrary.
 
roundhead said:
So what we have is Jref'ers posting witnesses who can be seen to not have been witnesses to a plane clipping lightpoles..

And 14 eyewitnesses interviewed on site and on camera stating the plane flew a course that would have with 100% certainty not been on a path to strike the poles.....

Only here would anybody believe those who saw nothing, and disbelieve 14 people who said the plane was on an entirely different flight path...

Only here
Click to expand...

Only the CIT crowd of idiots would put faith in the recollections of a traumatic moment that took a split second to occur, recollected 6 years after the event.

TAM:)
 
Then all the more reason an invitation should be extended to them. They can come and give their NOC testimony in person. Since the presentation is being given in their backyard, don't they have the right to be there or at least know of the event?
 
roundhead said:
Boy, look up deny in the dictionary, and there you are...


"their own words and voices":D:D:D


So if those are their own words and voices then we can confidently state the OCt is a lie, correct??
Click to expand...


I missed the post where you gave the names of witnesses who think that the mainstream account is a lie. Tell us again which witnesses saw the flyover. None, you say? Which witnesses DON'T think the plane hit the Pentagon. None, you say?

Don't you think these people should sue the lying imbeciles who are twisting their words to smear innocent Americans?
 
johnny karate said:
Dodge noted.

No one has been convinced by CIT's insanity, and you are unable to provide evidence to the contrary.
Click to expand...


They trot out the witnesses and let them speak to the camera.

You shoot the messenger, i listen to the evidence..a distinction i hope onlookers note.

Typical of ad hominem attacks
 
roundhead said:
They trot out the witnesses and let them speak to the camera.

You shoot the messenger, i listen to the evidence..a distinction i hope onlookers note.

Typical of ad hominem attacks
Click to expand...


Darn. I missed it again. You posted the names of the witnesses who saw the flyover and who think that the plane didn't hit the Pentagon. Could you show me the list, or at least, cite the post number where it first appeared?

Thanks.
 
roundhead said:
They trot out the witnesses and let them speak to the camera.

You shoot the messenger, i listen to the evidence..a distinction i hope onlookers note.

Typical of ad hominem attacks
Click to expand...

Still no evidence of your claims. How shocking.

No one believes what CIT has to say. No one. And those that are even aware of them and their retarded theories laugh at them. You can just ask the OC Weekly about that.

(And I'm not sure what you think an ad hominem attack is, but your reference here is not at all relevant.)
 
FineWine said:
CIT is not open to reality. Its goal is to absolve the Islamist terrorists and frame innocent Americans.
Click to expand...

That would make the CIT a front for Terrorists.

Where do they get their money?

JAQ
 
beachnut said:
On camera years, YEARS, after 911.
The best part is the morons at CIT do not tell you the 14 witnesses believe 77 impacted the Pentagon and hit the lampposts. So you have the Citizen Idiot Team make up lies.

CIT leaves out the many witnesses who saw 77 impact the pentagon, hit lampposts and fly to the south. In fact all the witnesses of CIT point on camera to the south flight path. LOL; did you look at what the morons put on video? They refute their own moronic conclusion. They all point to the south.

Their own witness saw 77 impact the Pentagon. Oops.

The path CIT says happen is physically impossible to fly. Good for you picking the biggest idiots to support with your evidence free delusions.
Click to expand...

If i believe the exact opposite of what you believe, i am most definately on the right track
 
roundhead said:
...
Typical of ad hominem attacks
Click to expand...
Yep.
roundhead said:
I dont honestly expect you to be able to figure anything out...so your off the hook..........
Click to expand...
Your failed ad hominem attack; weak at best.
roundhead said:
... in a garbage can that JREF continues to toss through for tidbits to munch on
Click to expand...
Even weaker...
roundhead said:
... Only here would anybody believe those who saw nothing, and disbelieve 14 people who said the plane was on an entirely different flight path...
Click to expand...
Funny part of your attempts at logic and insult; these witnesses are on video pointing to the south flight path. You never watched the CIT video?
 
roundhead said:
They trot out the witnesses and let them speak to the camera.

You shoot the messenger, i listen to the evidence..a distinction i hope onlookers note.

Typical of ad hominem attacks
Click to expand...

Hey, you are correct. The "witnesses" do speak to the camera! When are they going to release the raw video to torrent, like I asked about 100 times?

By the way, are they ever going to get around to doing anything other than handw aving away Probst?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom