CIT Fraud Revealed

jaydeehess said:
ahhhh, puts me in mind of a study in the 80s in which it showed that heavy coffee drinkers had a significantly greater risk of lung cancer!!!

The authors of the study had forgotten to take into account who was a smoker and who was not. Turned out that persons who drank a lot of coffee were also more likely to be smokers.

Complete derail but I thought interesting.:p
Click to expand...
When I quit smoking, coffee was one of my hardest challenges. Something about that coffee and a "butt". I'm glad I'm over that, I do love my coffee. (still no "butts") :D

[/end continuation of a derail]
 
Cobalt said:
Suppose we have a room of 100 people. The room is asked, "Raise your hand if you like X."

Five people raise their hand. Now, I never did great at math but, that's five percent(5%.)
Click to expand...

Congratulations for providing more math than we have seen from the CIT commando squad.
 
Jackanory said:
Beachnut, Gumboot, Reheat, BCR

Have CIT been chasing the flight path of shadows?
Click to expand...

CIT ignores their witnesses and ignores their limitations. I find it interesting the witnesses motion and point to the south. All of them.
When Madelyn points south, they have to throw out her testimony. They stick with Paik even though he points south, thinking they can have a flight path from Paiks office to north of the Citgo and over the Pentagon, which is impossible. Which makes CIT ideas dumber.

So far mudlark has failed to defend CIT with much more than more false information. Everyone here has given mudlark the best information we can, it is up to him to see CIT is a fraud.
 
beachnut said:
So far mudlark has failed to defend CIT with much more than more false information. Everyone here has given mudlark the best information we can, it is up to him to see CIT is a fraud.
Click to expand...

One can hope that mudlark is reflecting on just that and wondering why CIT has never produced any positive evidence of an actual "flyover."
 
Jackanory said:
Beachnut, Gumboot, Reheat, BCR

Have CIT been chasing the flight path of shadows?
Click to expand...

They have been chasing several different shadows to include the primary one that they have any small degree of credibility for at least two/three years. Every single major claim they have made has been soundly and conclusively destroyed, but they persist with nonsensical "yakity yak" on Internet Forums. Their crap contends with beam weapons, mini nukes, and no planes at the WTC for being the most outlandish and stupid theories regarding the events of 9/11.

Quite frankly, there is no reason to even acknowledge that they have a viable theory at all. I'm simply not interested in them any more and am amazed that anyone would do more than ridicule them as opposed to engaging in legitimate debate with one of their numerous socks. They deserve nothing more than contempt, period.
 
Reheat said:
Their crap contends with beam weapons, mini nukes, and no planes at the WTC for being the most outlandish and stupid theories regarding the events of 9/11.

.
Click to expand...

Well to be honest I see them as simply another no-planer contention. They claim that a plane flew at the Pentagon but the damage was caused by some other means than an aircraft impacting the building. Thus it is a "no plane caused the destruction at the Pentagon " theory, just as the for the WTC we are told no plane caused the damage. They differ only in the method by which they claim that all witnesses were fooled. (Indeed both groups claim no one on site actually witnessed a plane impact a building.)
 
Last edited:
Except Pentagon no plane theories actually seem to be really popular in the truth movement. Griffin, Gage and others have also praised NSA.
 
Fantasy Land

What a shame the black box data confirms a Northern Path and therefore misses the light poles completely. Still why let good solid evidence direct from the NTSB spoil a good Conspiracy THEORY that 19 AYRABS DONE IT.

So nice to see all you Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists (BCTs) still all penned into the JREF sheep pen so we can come along occasionally and bark at you all through the fence.

None of you can hack it in the other places where you'll find an even playing field so you all get herded here in some mutual grooming ritual. Don't see much of you BCTs out there in the big wide world these days I guess you all come back here to lick your wounds. Nice!
 
Last edited:
roscoe_the_first said:
What a shame the black box data confirms a Northern Path and therefore misses the light poles completely. Still why let good solid evidence direct from the NTSB spoil a good Conspiracy THEORY that 19 AYRABS DONE IT.

So nice to see all you Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists (BCTs) still all penned into the JREF sheep pen so we can come along occasionally and bark at you all through the fence.

None of you can hack it in the other places where you'll find an even playing field so you all get herded here in some mutual grooming ritual. Don't see much of you BCTs out there in the big wide world these days I guess you all come back here to lick your wounds. Nice!
Click to expand...

lol
 
roscoe_the_first said:
What a shame the black box data confirms a Northern Path and therefore misses the light poles completely. Still why let good solid evidence direct from the NTSB spoil a good Conspiracy THEORY that 19 AYRABS DONE IT.

So nice to see all you Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists (BCTs) still all penned into the JREF sheep pen so we can come along occasionally and bark at you all through the fence.

None of you can hack it in the other places where you'll find an even playing field so you all get herded here in some mutual grooming ritual. Don't see much of you BCTs out there in the big wide world these days I guess you all come back here to lick your wounds. Nice!
Click to expand...

Now that is authentic frontier gibberish.

It has got to hurt when even the other truthers ridicule your silly no plane theories, no planer.

oh that has GOT to hurt, lulz
 
roscoe_the_first said:
What a shame the black box data confirms a Northern Path and therefore misses the light poles completely.
Click to expand...

Actually, that is not true. Head over to the Journal for 911 Studies (a truther site) and you'll find a paper by Legge and Stutt that debunks that myth.

None of you can hack it in the other places where you'll find an even playing field so you all get herded here in some mutual grooming ritual.
Click to expand...

No, actually when I tried to help your friends at P4T out they banned me because facts and data made them look foolish. So here I am (and I am a truther by the way).

So here you are on a thread done by a truther reporting the findings of another truther (Erik Larson) attacking truthers, not debukers. Strange.
 
Last edited:
well folks, it has been a couple of years, and we have some new friends and some old friends back.

So now is as good a time as any to ask whether CIT ever released the raw video of their entire interview with Edward Paik.

Thanks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom