She contradicts the
Annex witnesses and the
NOC witnesses
NOBODY corraborates her account.
´Treetop level´? ´nearly skimming the rooftop of the STC´?
She certainly corraborates Ed Paik in this regard. How does this fit with the altitude data?
The plane was allegedly in a descent from over 200ft according to Warren Stutt´s data. Higher than the Sheraton.
Here is her alleged POV
You DO see the problem here?
Her POV was obstructed
In an e-mail exchange with Russell Pickering she also claim
Does the plane ´tilt´ anywhere in the FDR data within the last 8 seconds of flight? At 540+mph?
Lie. Ed Paik, Terry Morin and 4 of the ANC witnesses either weren´t in any position to see an ´impact´ or claimed that they didn´t.
The NOC testimony makes this physically impossible.
I´ve continually pulled you up on your lies Beachnut throughout this and other threads.
I have watched ALL of CIT´s videos free of charge. They are publically available on the net. Lying again..
Your ´physics´ are based on officially sanctioned unverified data, which no witness described. Altitude, trajectory and speed are contradicted at EVERY turn.
The ´2,223gs´ was cleared up publically by Rob Balsamo
Wow, lie number 3, all in one post. (New record for you?)
He ´pointed South´ yet drew this path. Slip of the pen?
That the other NOC witnesses actually saw the plane SOC shows you have delusions I can´t begin to fathom.
Paik points south, as you spew moronic delusions from CIT moronic investigators.
She is supported by physics, FDR, DNA, all the other witnesses saw the same plane she saw over her. Yes, she could see Flight 77 because it was up in the air, not on the ground behind trees, up in the air.
She saw 77 on the official flight path as did all CIT witnesses if you understood how to interpret witness statements. Sorry I am a trained investigator in aircraft accidents and trained to interview witnesses; CIT did nothing right except video tape witnesses pointing to the south flight path; you failed and spew the lies of CIT out of ignorance; why do you spread lies and why can't you do math?
CIT has to call her a liar, as the FDR and RADAR support her! You failed again and posted another CIT witness who supports reality, you call the official flight path as the best you can do is spread moronic lies and apologize for terrorists poorly.
She called CIT creepy, she was right, but she left out stupid on 911 issues, dirt dumb stupid.
You posted a lie, the FDR and RADAR support her account, you lost this one.
2,223 gs of stupid lies from Balsamo and CIT. Can't much worse than 11.2 gs still posted by Balsamo but then he makes up 2,223 gs! How stupid are p4t? 2,223gs worth, not a single pilot from pilots for truth are able to support CIT, save Balsamo, they are his crack team of nut case idea manufacturers, and there is not a thing you can do to fix it due to your lack of knowledge, zero math skills, and zero physics! You have failed to personally support a single CIT path with math! You can't? Why?
Got math.
Does the plane ´tilt´ anywhere in the FDR data within the last 8 seconds of flight? At 540+mph?
Yes, you failed to check before you ask a stupid question. Don't worry CIT does not understand the FDR, just like you. Yes at 483 KIAS, flight 77 tilt turn radius is 32 miles! Good luck math-man! LOL, the tilt she saw gave a turn radius of 32 miles, good going CIT and you, a cult member of the pathetic lie of Noc from CIT, Balsamo's failed investigators. Do you do any math at all? Do you try to use science, or is hearsay and moronic lies your special skill?
You failed to prove I lied, math proves you a liar; next time learn math. Education is the key to avoid fraud...
CIT works like this;
When witnesses clearly debunk the moronic NoC they call the witness a liar and make up lies about why they are not correct!
Paik points south, Paik draws a line south of the CITGO station, CIT tries to ignore the truth and presents a path Paik can't draw with accuracy as the NoC, but the path is impossible due to physics. mudlark can't do physics so mudlark repeats idiotic delusions from CIT.
FDR, DNA, RADAR, make all you post a lie made up out of ignorance.
not if it flew over his roof! Be a sport muddy and show us what window of the Sheraton it flew through to go over Paik's roof and then fly over Morins head ten feet inside the edge of the annex, And then from there make a loop around the Citgo and fly over the pentagon fireball.
