• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cindy Approaches the Twoof

~enigma~ said:
Seems simple enough to me. Is english your native language?
Click to expand...

OK I'll simplify it for you. I have no idea what "Tikkun Magazine" is, neither do I have any idea who "DRG" is. So I have no idea what I am timing with and what I am supposed to be covering up.

So would you like to explain further?
 
William Rea said:
OK I'll simplify it for you. I have no idea what "Tikkun Magazine" is, neither do I have any idea who "DRG" is. So I have no idea what I am timing with and what I am supposed to be covering up.

So would you like to explain further?
Click to expand...
It is now apparent you didn't read this thread. Maybe you should read post #16 and then you should understand. Otherwise, you are acting like a woowoo.
 
~enigma~ said:
For a woowoo that doesn't read the thread but makes a stupid remark anyway, yes and that is all you deserve.
Click to expand...

Point out the stupid remark.

Then tell me why I would read a link post that was neither directed at me nor relevant to anything I was arguing.

I am reporting your post for being a flaming personal attack btw.
 
Last edited:
William Rea said:
Point out the stupid remark.

Then tell me why I would read a link post that was neither directed at me nor relevant to anything I was arguing.

I am reporting your post for being a flaming personal attack btw.
Click to expand...
That's fine. Do as you want.
 
~enigma~ said:
Doesn't need one. If you read post #16 you can answer yourself. So stop being a woowoo and trying to flame.
Click to expand...

Ok let's pretend I am just too simple to keep up with your intellect. Explain to me how post#16 has any relevance to anything I posted and point out ANY stupid remark I made that was in any way relevant to post #16. Humour me.

Btw, if I am flaming then please report me.
 
Last edited:
William Rea said:
Ok let's pretend I am just too simple to keep up with your intellect. Explain to me how post#16 has any relevance to anything I posted and point out ANY stupid remark I made that was in any way relevant to post #16. Humour me.

Btw, if I am flaming then please report me.
Click to expand...
I don't have to pretend nothing but I will humor you with one reply. I replied to post #16 with post #17. You have no idea what i meant in post #36 so you answered with that great intellectual phrase "huh." Maybe you should read post #16 before you continue to look like a total ignorant woo. that is my last response to you on this issue. Understand?
 
~enigma~ said:
I don't have to pretend nothing but I will humor you with one reply. I replied to post #16 with post #17. You have no idea what i meant in post #36 so you answered with that great intellectual phrase "huh." Maybe you should read post #16 before you continue to look like a total ignorant woo. that is my last response to you on this issue. Understand?
Click to expand...

OK now I get it, your pissed because I didn't acknowledge the brilliance of post#17 as authored by you. I really would make that the last post because you are making yourself look foolish in a not very Rawk way.
 
William Rea said:
OK now I get it, your pissed because I didn't acknowledge the brilliance of post#17 as authored by you. I really would make that the last post because you are making yourself look foolish in a not very Rawk way.
Click to expand...

We will never know what you are. You have such a big smoke screen we will never know if you are a truthful fact filled 9/11 smart guy, or a giant CTer with lots of lies. The smoke screen is your talk. If you do not like the "lies" etc comments, then please bring up some faxts that support the 9/11 truth movement.

I can help you; there are only .00067 percent of all US engineers in the truth movement. You could check this fact and may be correct me.

But I expect a giant smoke screen to continue.

Still what could Cindy do to help the truth movement - she could provide facts, but she will not.
 
=Brainster;2396550]Jon Gold issues a call to Cindy to embrace the "Truth", for the "Truth" shall give her everything she desires:
Click to expand...


I've been claiming for months that Gold doesn't believe a word of the fantasists' nonsense. He is trying to harness their lunatic energies to his leftist agenda.





BTW, Perry, I wish you would join us in condemning all the Troofers and those like Cindy who seem determined to lend them moral support. I have condemned Republicans like Ron Paul
Click to expand...


Ron Paul is not a Republican. He is a libertarian who runs on the Republican line. My first exposure to a rabid, totally unhinged conspiracy liar was on a libertarian discussion forum. Although I occasionally host a cable show sponsored by the Libertarian Party, I'm not an enrolled Libertarian. I consider myself a conservative with libertarian leanings.


who've dipped their toes in the swamp of 9-11 Denial. You can always make it clear that you support her on other matters while opposing her pandering to the kooks on this issue.
Click to expand...


I must repeat this point over and over. I am not the conservative counterpart to Perry Logan. I am not a mindless idolator of George Bush. I disagree with more of his policies than I agree with. Cindy Sheehan does not offer a responsible critique of the neoconservative vision for the Middle East. She is an America-hating loon who relies heavily on slandering Bush and fabricating insane motives for the invasion of Iraq that fit neatly into the fantasists' worldview.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom