CIA agent outed by President..

No more so than it was obvious that I was talking about the Plame case.

But it is good to see that you haven't lost any mobility in that knee.
 
crimresearch said:
And that is one of the problems with getting enough facts to critically examine issues involving covert employees.

The CIA has used a phrase for Plame that sounds almost exactly somewhat similar to 'covert operative' but isn't.... 'covered employee'...does it mean that she was a spy when outed, or not?
Was Armstrong ever a spy? Then why conceal his identity? And under what legal authority? The spy confidentiality law? Then why isn't Kerry in violation?
Did Wilson commit a crime when bragging about his wife to boost sales of a book, or to get sent to Africa?

And so on, and so on.

Without hard evidence, this whole thing is primarily speculation.

But it is always a good idea to 'out' the pseudo-skeptics and undercover woos at JREF by tossing such questions out there and seeing who's knee jerks.

Fun, too

:D
Looks suspiciously like highly partisan knee jerking. No sources, no references, lots of assertions and speculation. Which part of this little tirade does not look like O'Reilly Lite?
 
Your point that daring to ask for evidence is enough to get you spluttering and whining is noted.

Thanks for going on record as claiming that questions, and requests for links to evidence are 'partisan'...and then getting that spectacularly wrong, for all to see.

I guess your psychic powers on on the fritz, eh?
 
The CIA has used a phrase for Plame that sounds almost exactly somewhat similar to 'covert operative' but isn't.... 'covered employee'...does it mean that she was a spy when outed, or not? Was Armstrong ever a spy? Then why conceal his identity? And under what legal authority? The spy confidentiality law? Then why isn't Kerry in violation? Did Wilson commit a crime when bragging about his wife to boost sales of a book, or to get sent to Africa?
Questions, my @$$, O'R Lite. My psychic powers show me that we both know those are statements couched as questions. It gives you an out for throwing unsubstantiated claims into a discussion. AB&WM.

Very similar to your first trip to the pharmacy; "I'll have a pack of gum, and a newspaper, and a ballpoint pen, and some nail clippers, and some condoms and another pack of gum.
 
Keep going, Randi's million is almost yours...

Or not.

You would stand a better chance of winning, if you were actually *right* about anything, instead of knowingly lying in a childish attempt at a tantrum.
 
crimresearch said:
Keep going, Randi's million is almost yours...

Or not.

You would stand a better chance of winning, if you were actually *right* about anything, instead of knowingly lying in a childish attempt at a tantrum.
I think your agenda is showing. Looks like you spilled hypocrisy all over it.
 

Back
Top Bottom