• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Christophera's Other Conspiracy

You didn't even know what station your local PBS channel was broadcasting. And your memory is notoriously atrocious.

I watched on channel 10, which happens to be the channel that PBS 28 is aired on. I forget the station not the channel.

Christophera said:
What do you know at all. I would be surprised if you could even come up with the purpose of life as a tidbit of knowledge.

Survival. Plain and simple.

Now, what's the purpose of existence, Chrissy?

So it is only existence to you huh?

The purpose of life is love. Why? Because love protects life.

Why would a woman not know that? A woman using red roses as an avatar?
 
I watched on channel 10, which happens to be the channel that PBS 28 is aired on. I forget the station not the channel.





So it is only existence to you huh?

The purpose of life is love. Why? Because love protects life.

Why would a woman not know that? A woman using red roses as an avatar?


Life exists without love. Love does little to protect life.

Who are you to be spouting off about love? Why did your wife leave you again?

BTW - I'm a man. I've mentioned this innumerable times in passing. And while I value love, I do so for purely aesthetic purposes.

The avatar, btw, was made for me - a blending of the fantastic and the natural. My old avatar expressed me better, perhaps, but I tired of it.

Nevertheless, you've once again spouted off, and once again been proven wrong. How will you equivocate and still maintain that this incident was 'the biggest of the postal shootings' now?

Tell me, Chrissy, are you ever right about anything? Then again, don't bother. I already know your answer.
 
To make a gruesome distinction, a mass murder is considered to take place in a short period of time, while serial killings can take place over any length of time. In my list I stuck to mass murders of 8 or more people. I didn't know about the Edmond shooting, though. Time to get off this subject!


its hard to top this lady

http://www.crimelibrary.com/serial_killers/predators/bathory/countess_1.html

Nevertheless, if the ledger with 650 names is what many believe it is, then no single person in the centuries to come surpassed her victim toll. Her reputation remains as one of the most bloodthirsty killers on record, in part because her noble status made her untouchable in a society that protected its aristocrats.

after awhile there were hardly any young women/girls for her to kill locally, she had tortured/murdered so many.
 
Life exists without love. Love does little to protect life.

Who are you to be spouting off about love? Why did your wife leave you again?

I left her.

BTW - I'm a man. I've mentioned this innumerable times in passing. And while I value love, I do so for purely aesthetic purposes.

Good, finally something up front that belies the lie implied by your avatar.

Animals love and use that love to pretect their offsping. Love is nature. Humans have been convinced otherwise by their ego. Thanks for the demo.
 
I left her.

So where's the love?

Good, finally something up front that belies the lie implied by your avatar.

So you're a woman with bleeding eyes?

Oh, I see. Because truth is what's in pictures...

Well, it didn't work for the phallic dust cloud images, and it doesn't work here.

Animals love and use that love to pretect their offsping. Love is nature. Humans have been convinced otherwise by their ego. Thanks for the demo.

Actually, there's a number of animals that leave their offspring untended, or worse, that try to kill their own offspring (or the offspring of other members of their species). Higher mammals tend to protect their young more, simply out of a biological drive to do so.

As far as we know, only a few species of mammal exhibit what we would consider 'love'.

More examples of pig-headed stupidity and general ignorance from Chrissy.
 
So where's the love?

The children.

So you're a woman with bleeding eyes?

No, but I also use my real name. It represents the mothers and thier need for justice as the promise of America.

Actually, there's a number of animals that leave their offspring untended, or worse, that try to kill their own offspring (or the offspring of other members of their species). Higher mammals tend to protect their young more, simply out of a biological drive to do so.

As far as we know, only a few species of mammal exhibit what we would consider 'love'.

More examples of pig-headed stupidity and general ignorance from Chrissy.

Love is natural and depending on conditions and the nature of each species has protocol dealing with their offspring. Also, species can learn dysfunctions and practice them. Those genetic lines do not survive if it is true dysfunction, which is not always easy to tell in the short term.

The important point is that it is the unconscious mind that knows love and it is also the unconscious mind that knows fear. By using fear, dark forces can control us unconsciously from childhood and we will not know it.

The other conspiracy is about government hiding that fact from us or refusing to let us counteract that fact with knowledge of the unconscious.

Love can compel understanding. The conscious mind can understand which dispels fear, if the fear is unreasonable.
 
[referring to his "bleeding eyes" avatar] It represents the mothers and thier need for justice as the promise of America.
Say what? Either you are saying that mothers without justice have bleeding eyes, or that the Statue of Liberty should.



Love is natural and depending on conditions and the nature of each species has protocol dealing with their offspring. Also, species can learn dysfunctions and practice them. Those genetic lines do not survive if it is true dysfunction, which is not always easy to tell in the short term.
You have no idea about biology, do you.

The important point is that it is the unconscious mind that knows love and it is also the unconscious mind that knows fear. By using fear, dark forces can control us unconsciously from childhood and we will not know it.

The other conspiracy is about government hiding that fact from us or refusing to let us counteract that fact with knowledge of the unconscious.

Love can compel understanding. The conscious mind can understand which dispels fear, if the fear is unreasonable.
I believe the prosecution rests, Your Honour.
 
The children.



No, but I also use my real name. It represents the mothers and thier need for justice as the promise of America.



Love is natural and depending on conditions and the nature of each species has protocol dealing with their offspring. Also, species can learn dysfunctions and practice them. Those genetic lines do not survive if it is true dysfunction, which is not always easy to tell in the short term.

The important point is that it is the unconscious mind that knows love and it is also the unconscious mind that knows fear. By using fear, dark forces can control us unconsciously from childhood and we will not know it.

The other conspiracy is about government hiding that fact from us or refusing to let us counteract that fact with knowledge of the unconscious.

Love can compel understanding. The conscious mind can understand which dispels fear, if the fear is unreasonable.

:dl:

I would try to respond to individual parts of this, but I'm too busy laughing!

Chris:





GO BACK TO SCHOOL.
 
Y'all please stop. This is the first thread where Christophera is involved that I have looked at in any detail, but it is obvious to me that he (she?) truly needs serious help. Several of you have mentioned that, but don't seem to really understand it. This is picking on someone who can't defend himself effectively.
 
We are standing by awaiting your follow up.

Here are a few more instances of the current mass insanity, not all by any means, that Santa Barbara is undergoing.

4/98 Monica Moritz shoots Rundle in the head at close range trying to miss.

8/3/98 Suicide of man on Vincent ave. with bomb, threat SB. city.

8/7/98 Mans body hanging from tree at SB. junior high school.

8/22/98 Woman, (Shoenover) from Carpinteria mails poison.

11/2/98 Woman in Carpinteria murdered by husband (Favorita)

12/13/98 Woman at Foothill & La cumbre, suicide by cop attempt (Jamie Allen)

12/30/98 Man lying on RR tracks killed.

1/17/99 27 yr. old man found hanging high in tree in Rattlesnake Cyn.

2/28/02 Martin Thomas Hartman intentionally burns man to death in arson fire.


A higher national average of suicide, 51 in one year

http://truthasaur.com/local/secretcity32.html
That's nothing. When I was at Northern Illinois University in the late 80's we had a better list than that, w/ a far lower population. There were 2 people who choked to death on their own vomit when put in a car to sober up while their friends stayed at the party. One guy who stole a glass from a bar by putting it in his pants pocket, after he left he slipped on the ice, the glass broke and severed an artery and he bled to death on the sidewalk. And then the trains! One guy was clowning around on the viaduct and fell off and broke his neck, another guy passed out on the tracks on the way back from a bar and was run over. Then a guy and his friend (and I knew these 2 :( ) were tripping on acid and seeing who could get closest to the train flying by at 70 mph, one of the freight cars had a ladder attached to the side and this ladder ripped off the head of one of them. Then there was the frat boy who made "chinese eyes" at a car full of asians on the expressway. One of the asians pulled out a gun and shot him dead (police never found the shooter).

Maybe it was really the chemtrails, and nothing to do w/ college kids doing stupid things while intoxicated?
 
Last edited:
That's nothing. When I was at Northern Illinois University in the late 80's we had a better list than that, w/ a far lower population. There were 2 people who choked to death on their own vomit when put in a car to sober up while their friends stayed at the party. One guy who stole a glass from a bar by putting it in his pants pocket, after he left he slipped on the ice, the glass broke and severed an artery and he bled to death on the sidewalk. And then the trains! One guy was clowning around on the viaduct and fell off and broke his neck, another guy passed out on the tracks on the way back from a bar and was run over. Then a guy and his friend (and I knew these 2 :( ) were tripping on acid and seeing who could get closest to the train flying by at 70 mph, one of the freight cars had a ladder attached to the side and this ladder ripped off the head of one of them. Then there was the frat boy who made "chinese eyes" at a car full of asians on the expressway. One of the asians pulled out a gun and shot him dead (police never found the shooter).

Maybe it was really the chemtrails, and nothing to do w/ college kids doing stupid things while intoxicated?

I have to admit, that is pretty wild cat. Although what period of time did that all happen in?

However, doesn't it sound strange that a woman shoots a man in the head from 5 feet away then tells the judge "She was trying to miss"?

4/98 Monica Moritz shoots Rundle in the head at close range trying to miss.

You ought to see what happens in Isla Vista if you seek bizarre. Not quite so deadly as what you cite, but more bizarre in many ways as far as the alcohol related events.


btw, where is Sez me? Mass murders HAVE happened in his home town, I've filed a federal lawusit to try and see that it doesn't happen again, he's starting threads as if he doesn't believe it, seeking examples. I'm providing the examples, THEN, he abandons the thread?????
 
Yes, Christophera, I did start this thread.

I now wish I had not done so. I now realize that your concept of "mass murders" is different than mine. Sufficiently different that our conceptual chasm cannot be bridged.

So I have abandoned this thread and have not replied to your PMs. I do not want to pursue any dialog with you on "mass murders" or "9/11" or any related subjects. And I do not intend to justify my decision to you or to this thread.

Finally, I would hope that other Forumites also let this thread die from neglect.
 
Yes, Christophera, I did start this thread.

I now wish I had not done so. I now realize that your concept of "mass murders" is different than mine. Sufficiently different that our conceptual chasm cannot be bridged.

So I have abandoned this thread and have not replied to your PMs. I do not want to pursue any dialog with you on "mass murders" or "9/11" or any related subjects. And I do not intend to justify my decision to you or to this thread.

Finally, I would hope that other Forumites also let this thread die from neglect.

I can imagine you wish you had not started this thread. However, it is a very important subject. We should be able to learn from our mistakes, that includes you, if you think starting this thread was a mistake.

Whasamatta?

Jennifer Sanmarco didn't kill enough?

David Attias running down 4 and killing them with his saab not enough?


These were mass murders and I warned the county of Santa Barbara in 1997 that it was going to happen. I did not know when or where or who, but I knew if they didn't follow laws it was going to happen and happen in a bad way, and it did.

I'm still trying to get SB. County to follow laws. Do you think they should?

And, btw, I don't think I missed any PM's, and I've been looking.
 
Last edited:
These were mass murders and I warned the county of Santa Barbara in 1997 that it was going to happen. I did not know when or where or who, but I knew if they didn't follow laws it was going to happen and happen in a bad way, and it did.

So if you did not know when, where or who, how should the county of Santa Barbara (not the police??) stop these mass murderes?
 
So if you did not know when, where or who, how should the county of Santa Barbara (not the police??) stop these mass murderes?

Is the fact that I do not know when, who or where the murders are going to take place, justification for them to violate laws?

And I claimed in my letter to them that by following laws the murders would be stopped?
 
Is the fact that I do not know when, who or where the murders are going to take place, justification for them to violate laws?

Even if they violated laws, how does that relate?

And I claimed in my letter to them that by following laws the murders would be stopped?

How so?
 
Christophera said:
Is the fact that I do not know when, who or where the murders are going to take place, justification for them to violate laws?

Even if they violated laws, how does that relate?

Clearly you do not know the purpose of law. The purpose of law is to protect life.

If there are dark factions using knowledge of the unconscious mind to condition and program people for extreme violence, and suddenly the courts develop away to recognize that people can be unconsciously programmed, then those dark, dangerous factions will hesititate before unleashing their killers.

Christophera said:
And I claimed in my letter to them that by following laws the murders would be stopped?


As I said above, the information which I subpoenaed would give tools and reason to psychology to 1.) accept openly that unconscious programming to extreme behaviors possible. I wrote the letter before I subpoenaed the documents. 2.)Create processes for law enforcement and the courts to investigate the people and their programming to find the parties guilty for doing such things to a persons mind.

All of the above provides very effective deterrant to those doing these things.
 

Back
Top Bottom