1) There's no indication that your alleged thief's "declaration" was notarized or used in any legal proceeding. I could write a declaration stating that I'm Superman and have it witnessed. That doesn't make it true.
2) The supposed missing records are from the years 1876-78. Was the mass hypnosis program in effect then?
3) The declaration claims that the stolen ledger contained about 650 records of arrests for insanity. Even in Santa Barbara, I doubt that it's a crime to be insane.
4) If the stolen ledger contained the records of 650 insanity cases (217 per year), why were there only 14 such cases per year in subsequent years, according the clerk's statement that follows?
Again, the clerk's records are of insanity cases that came before the court, not insanity arrests. If a person commits a crime and their mental competence is at issue, that becomes an insanity case for the court to decide. Likewise, if a person's family seeks to have them committed to a mental hospital or other facility, that becomes an insanity case before the court. The clerk's statement indicates that only 8 records were missing. I'll take that figure over the guess of a thief.
then the Conty fails to appear on
fsubpoena.
They didn't "fail to appear." You subpoened arrest records from 1876-1879. They said they didn't have them. Maybe that's because your friend stole them. Remember his declaration?
Chris, your illness is not your fault. Help is available, as you know. Please, please, please stop posting your paranoid, nonsensical rants here and focus on getting well.
