The other 23% want to see it moved to some overgrown field near a refrigerator with no door and a car on blocks. Call it Hillbilly Stonehedge.a_unique_person said:
77% of americans don't want the monument moved.
Originally posted by Silicon
![]()
I made that point earlier.....very bad message to send. But learn from it.....justice is more like just us. It ain't the same for you and me. There are class distinctions and a hierarchy in the land of the free.nightwind said:Why was the judge in the case not charged with "Contempt of Court"? Is it because he is a judge and above the law?
It seems that some sort of punishment needs to be laid down here. Had a "regular" person went against and order like this, they would be in jail.
nightwind said:Why was the judge in the case not charged with "Contempt of Court"? Is it because he is a judge and above the law?
It seems that some sort of punishment needs to be laid down here. Had a "regular" person went against and order like this, they would be in jail.
Cinorjer said:This kind of bogus polling really clinches my drawers. We're presented with this kind of thing by the media, with no way to check on how valid it is. This one in particular is highly suspect.
Wow. that's a stretch. I notice no justification was given as to what pegan symbol the panther represents...dissonance said:
I'm sure Mississippi is just overflowing with tax revenue and can afford the luxury of defending the lawsuits that it will be inviting.Mississippi Gov. Ronnie Musgrove volunteered Thursday to join neighboring Alabama in the fight over the Ten Commandments monument by offering to display it in his state's capitol building for a week starting September 7.
...
Musgrove, a Democrat, urged other governors to allow similar displays in their states "to show support for our common Judeo-Christian heritage."
I wonder how the good Reverend would react if reminded, "You know what else isn't in the Constitution? Tax exemptions for churches."The Rev. James Dobson, chairman of Focus on the Family, told the rally the First Amendment specifically addresses Congress and does not restrict displays like Moore's.
"They've taken those simple words and twisted them to mean something the founders had no intention of," he said. "The separation of church and state is not in the Constitution. They've had to contrive the basis of these things, and then talk about them as if they're a fact."
Cinorjer said:I love reading about Native American and Pagan religions, and I've never heard of a panther being associated with anything. The Native Americans told myths about all sorts of animals like coyote, raven, etc. No panther that I can remember. What's telling is that the woman talks about how it's disturbing because it's a "cat-like image". Cat = witchcraft. I suppose. The world is full of nuts, that's for sure.
Is witchcraft considered pegan by Christians? I thought they considered it Satanic. Of course, perhaps they consider peganism = satanism.Cinorjer said:Cat = witchcraft. I suppose.
The Rev. James Dobson, chairman of Focus on the Family, told the rally the First Amendment specifically addresses Congress and does not restrict displays like Moore's.
"They've taken those simple words and twisted them to mean something the founders had no intention of," he said. "The separation of church and state is not in the Constitution. They've had to contrive the basis of these things, and then talk about them as if they're a fact."
Touche!Brown said:I wonder how the good Reverend would react if reminded, "You know what else isn't in the Constitution? Tax exemptions for churches."
I suspect that this particular group of Christians considers 'anything other than Christianity' = satanism.Upchurch said:Is witchcraft considered pegan by Christians? I thought they considered it Satanic. Of course, perhaps they consider peganism = satanism.
As far as Moore's Court battle is concerned, the fight is over. The federal court's ruling is binding upon him and his state. If he wishes to try to provoke litigation in other states, then he should consider stepping down from the bench, as such political activities are generally inconsistent with the role of judge."It's not over. We do not intend to be stopped. We do not intend to give up. We have only begun to fight," Moore, who has offered to let Congress use his display in the Capitol, said at a news conference in Alabama.
...
Moore challenged the high court to settle the question once and for all, and accused the justices of ducking their responsibility to clarify murky questions about the constitutional principle of separation of church and state.
Unless he disagreed with their opinion.Moore challenged the high court to settle the question once and for all...