By the way, the lawsuit filed by a Christian radio talk show host and a pastor has been dismissed without prejudice. Read the order
here (PDF).
Basically, the judge dismissed the case on two alternative grounds. One was jurisdictional, namely, that he did not have the authority to invalidate another judge's injunction. Although the plaintiffs did not frame their claim as such, invalidating another judge's injunction was what the plaintiffs were in effect trying to have him do. The other ground was that venue (the appropriate
place for the suit to have been brought) was improper. Suit should have been brought in Montgomery, which is in a different judicial district.
The dismissal was "without prejudice," meaning that the plaintiffs may, if they wish, try to bring the suit again in the correct district.
The judge expressed no opinion on whether the plaintiffs had standing or whether they had any valid legal grounds for relief. The judge also suggested that perhaps the plaintiffs might have sued the wrong people.
Notably, the judge's ruling was largely respectful of the plaintiffs (with a few remarks that might be deemed uncomplimentary). The judge did not suggest that they had a legal leg to stand on.
