• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Challenge to CIT

Reheat said:
I am flabbergasted and devastated over this! Here, I thought I was trying to help and I'm getting attacked on every Forum on which these guys post.

They admire and protect possible GOVERNMENT PLANTS, but blast my reputation on every front.

I'm trying to do their job for them as a MESSENGER, and I'm getting attacked?

And to think that I was once under the impression that they were in search of teh truth.
Click to expand...


That's the game CIT and PfT likes to play. When in doubt attack, attack then attack some more.
 
Craig IS NOT going to consider your evidence anyway!
Craig from the CIT proving YET AGAIN that he is all about ego stroking and not at all interested in "pursuing truth"
Present evidence and we will explain for you why it does not refute the evidence we present proving a military deception on 9/11.
Click to expand...

WOW so he admits that he wont look at the evidence in a fair and unbiased way.
So we basically having him admit that he is a fraud.
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=133

Oh yes and they will not tolerate debate in the Pentagon forum:
First, you can move the discussion back to the Pentagon area where it belongs so others can participate.

Then you can address the questions I have presented to you and Craig repeatedly for the last year and that you have never directly answered.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
It seems to be math aversion in its most stunning form.

The CIT will hold that their witnesses must be correct on one , widely interpreted, point, that the plane was north of the CITGO canopy as it passed it.
Because they inherently mistrust math, have basically no understanding of it in application to real life situations and are basically bad at it, they will stubbornly continue to assert that the NoC statements are correct.

It has been pointed out time and again that
- no one here accusses the witnesses of lieing, only of error on one point
- that there is no physical way for the witnesses to be correct AND for a plane, any plane that matches the witness descriptions, to perform manouvers that would put is along any path that agrees with the witnesseses location for the flight path
- that many other witnesses put the plane along the path that is also marked by the fallen lamp posts
- that all witnesses in proximity to the Pentagon, who saw the plane, have stated that the plane hit the Pentagon, including their own witnesses
- that no at all who saw the plane that flew low and fast towards the Pentagon saw it fly over the Pentagon, including their own witnesses. Neither did anyone on the other sides of the Pentagon see a low flying plane ( by definition this would be one that a witness on the east side of the Pentagon might confuse with actually having impacted the building) fly over the Pentagon

The CIT either are aware that their contentions are incorrect and simply cannot admit it since it would, in their minds, be supportive of the neo-conservative administration; OR, they cannot comprehend that the witnesses are incorrect.

The CIT have demonstrated several times that they have problems with temporal perception (Turcois interpreted as having reported a fireball from the impact occuring before impact,, Aldo stating that a plane already in the air could not have taken off yet)

So, math aversion and temporal dyslexia combine to create the CIT.
 
Last edited:
Reheat said:
I am flabbergasted and devastated over this! Here, I thought I was trying to help and I'm getting attacked on every Forum on which these guys post.

They admire and protect possible GOVERNMENT PLANTS, but blast my reputation on every front.

I'm trying to do their job for them as a MESSENGER, and I'm getting attacked?

And to think that I was once under the impression that they were in search of teh truth.
Click to expand...

Reheat,

Do you realize the implications of what you are saying. In order for the eyewitnesses to be operatives/plants that means that something other than what the government said happened at the Pentagon. Thus you prove a cover up at the Pentagon.

Now this will really boggle your mind. Are the witnesses telling the truth about where they saw the plane or are they government plants?

You realize the implications of all of this, don't you?

I know you're coming around. You just need to have this eat at you for a few more days.......
 
TC329 said:
Reheat,

Do you realize the implications of what you are saying. In order for the eyewitnesses to be operatives/plants that means that something other than what the government said happened at the Pentagon. Thus you prove a cover up at the Pentagon.
Now this will really boggle your mind. Are the witnesses telling the truth about where they saw the plane or are they government plants?

You realize the implications of all of this, don't you?

I know you're coming around. You just need to have this eat at you for a few more days.......
Click to expand...

This is proof? Wow, please get a lawyer and start the proceedings. I smell a pulitzer in your future. I knew you could do it. Good job.
 
If the eyewitnesses aren't genuine and aren't telling the truth but are actual government plants as Reheat is starting to suspect then that means the government put them there because they have something to hide and are concerned genuine witnesses would be discovered.

Or the plane was on the NoC and the witnesses are genuine and telling the truth. I still believe this to be the case but Reheat seems open to other possibilities.
 
TC329 said:
If the eyewitnesses aren't genuine and aren't telling the truth but are actual government plants as Reheat is starting to suspect then that means the government put them there because they have something to hide and are concerned genuine witnesses would be discovered.
Click to expand...
First of all, it could be the government has a sense of humor and wanted to see what idiots would actually believe them.

Or, reheat was making fun of you and also trying to see what idiots would actually believe him.

Are you able to catch the theme here?

Oh - by the way, what media outlets and authorities have CIT contacted with their "evidence"?
 
TC329 said:
If the eyewitnesses aren't genuine and aren't telling the truth but are actual government plants as Reheat is starting to suspect then that means the government put them there because they have something to hide and are concerned genuine witnesses would be discovered.
Click to expand...

I suspect you'll find reheat was being deeply ironic. But he'll be along soon enough to clear that up I guess.
 
TC329 said:
Or the plane was on the NoC and the witnesses are genuine and telling the truth. I still believe this to be the case but Reheat seems open to other possibilities.
Click to expand...

The witnesses could have been hired by Pomeroo & Gravy. (Why do you think Pom wants to go with you to do new interviews?) They were instructed to tell you some ridiculous story just to keep you busy and it's all gearing up for a big reveal after your next DVD release to make you look like fools on a public-access version of the show Punk'd.
 
TC329 said:
If the eyewitnesses aren't genuine and aren't telling the truth but are actual government plants as Reheat is starting to suspect then that means the government put them there because they have something to hide and are concerned genuine witnesses would be discovered.

Or the plane was on the NoC and the witnesses are genuine and telling the truth. I still believe this to be the case but Reheat seems open to other possibilities.
Click to expand...

Your getting close mate.............there is another option though

The few witness you have for North Side are genuine but were mistaken in some aspects of the day. I do not believe you are failing to see what reheat is doing here? Try concentrating really hard, it does not hurt too much.
 
TC329 said:
If the eyewitnesses aren't genuine and aren't telling the truth but are actual government plants as Reheat is starting to suspect then that means the government put them there because they have something to hide and are concerned genuine witnesses would be discovered.
Click to expand...

I suspect you'll find reheat was being deeply ironic. But he'll be along soon enough to clear that up I guess.
 
TC329 said:
Or the plane was on the NoC and the witnesses are genuine and telling the truth. I still believe this to be the case but Reheat seems open to other possibilities.
Click to expand...

Is it wrong for me to find it hilarious rather than sad that TC does not realize that his pals at the CIT are being mocked?

I have also been just scanning this thread every once in a while, but it seems that the CIT has been told that its NOC is impossible, has been asked to present its maths in support, has come up with wildly inconsistent flight paths, seems to be throwing one of its witnessess under a bus, and STILL has not explained why all of its witnesess testify that the plane hit the Pentagon?

Nice.
 
TC329 said:
Reheat,

Do you realize the implications of what you are saying. In order for the eyewitnesses to be operatives/plants that means that something other than what the government said happened at the Pentagon. Thus you prove a cover up at the Pentagon.

Now this will really boggle your mind. Are the witnesses telling the truth about where they saw the plane or are they government plants?

You realize the implications of all of this, don't you?

I know you're coming around. You just need to have this eat at you for a few more days.......
Click to expand...
Paranoid poppycock. After blaming the military for murder with out evidence, you go off the deep end and just say everyone is a liar, a government agent. So no matter who says what, how bad your math is, how jdx and p4t can't even do flying physics correct, you now have the big McGuffin. Your pathetic paranoia is coming out. (if you guys do drugs, try stopping for a while and see if you can come back to reality)

The only thing to cover-up here is your Paranoid poppycock. You defy logic. The witnesses you have are not liars. In 2001 some of them saw 77 hit the Pentagon. Now you interview them and quote mine so bad, you think they support your made up story. It failed. The funny thing is, on the map of the NTSB, it was placed wrong; you have no idea how the NTSB video is made, but the map was shifted 20 degrees on their working copy but they were finished for the FBI. You and jdx think that is part of the cover-up and persist at proving the false "ground track" the NTSB posted because you do not have a clue how the animation is done. 77 is confirmed by all the evidence. You have failed to connect the dots and now suffer illusions of CTs everywhere. You fail to understand were we live and why we were an easy target for 9/11. When I look back I could have taken any plane I wanted if I was like the terrorists, cutting throats of whoever got up, and the pilots behind their backs. Too easy, and now pathetically you blame our citizen soldiers for the murders on 9/11. Your delusional world is reflected by your multiple impossible flight paths, and jdx stupid math errors he can't fix in a month, when normal people fix them in minutes. You guys including SPreston are bad at math, go back to school and take some physics.

This is your problem, some sort of mental block which does not let you see reality. We live in a very free society, you think it is a police state. Blame the military and make up false stories, be paranoid all your witnesses are in on it, what else can you do?
 
Last edited:
TC329 said:
Reheat,

Do you realize the implications of what you are saying. In order for the eyewitnesses to be operatives/plants that means that something other than what the government said happened at the Pentagon. Thus you prove a cover up at the Pentagon.

Now this will really boggle your mind. Are the witnesses telling the truth about where they saw the plane or are they government plants?

You realize the implications of all of this, don't you?

I know you're coming around. You just need to have this eat at you for a few more days.......
Click to expand...

Here we go YET AGAIN doing the are you calling my witnesses liars dance.
Time to get a new act there Dom!
Dom answer this trivia question for me:

Does TC/Dom spend more time in his day:
A) arguing ON THE INTERNET instead of contacting the authorities?
B) Helping Aldo become a better DJ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom