• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cern and String Theory

geni said:
But string theory is not true randomness. Also we know panck's constant applies on a quantum scale.

no we don't, we only understand that it applies to a measurable property; in which case it has already been observed and exists in physical linearity.
 
Answer said:


no we don't, we only understand that it applies to a measurable property; in which case it has already been observed and exists in physical linearity.

like i've already said in my other thread, THE MOMENT PEN IS PUT TO PAPER TRUE RANDOMNESS IS DESTROYED.
 
Answer said:


like i've already said in my other thread, THE MOMENT PEN IS PUT TO PAPER TRUE RANDOMNESS IS DESTROYED.

in this fashion Science is nothing but nonsense built on top of nonsense. TEN dimesions or ELEVEN dimensions, you illusionary-reality created by Thought is utterly symbolic.. ALL THEORIES ARE CORRECT.

11, 1=1

10, 1=0

ALL IS ONE.
 
Answer said:


no we don't, we only understand that it applies to a measurable property; in which case it has already been observed and exists in physical linearity.

this is what i've been going on and on about. all the "progress" humanity has made is AN ILLUSION! all these observed quanta never existed before the hive-mind created them. what exists on a quantum-level is.. NOTHING AND EVERYTHING! infinite possibility, that is all.
 
Answer said:


this is what i've been going on and on about. all the "progress" humanity has made is AN ILLUSION! all these observed quanta never existed before the hive-mind created them. what exists on a quantum-level is.. NOTHING AND EVERYTHING! infinite possibility, that is all.

AND.. as should be obvious to anyone who has even a tenuous grasp on quantum mechanics.. reality is non-local and there exists a consciousness that sees through our eyes and is responsible for the creation of these quanta. you may think you have free will; but if someone else controls everything you perceive, how can that be so? he/she/it can create any obstacle it wants in order to lead you in the right or wrong direction. why do you think you Doubt? it's so you won't come to these conclusions. Doubt sits behind perception and behind doubt is GOD! the Bible says something about passing a Test.. EVERYTHING IS A TEST!
 
Answer,

I hate to be rude, but you seem to be a bit confused. This is the Science and Mathematics forum, not the Incoherent Nonsense forum.

Dr. Stupid
 
Answer said:


AND.. as should be obvious to anyone who has even a tenuous grasp on quantum mechanics.. reality is non-local and there exists a consciousness that sees through our eyes and is responsible for the creation of these quanta. you may think you have free will; but if someone else controls everything you perceive, how can that be so? he/she/it can create any obstacle it wants in order to lead you in the right or wrong direction. why do you think you Doubt? it's so you won't come to these conclusions. Doubt sits behind perception and behind doubt is GOD! the Bible says something about passing a Test.. EVERYTHING IS A TEST!

so, if you are Doubt/Eve/Satan you think that you can defeat who is First and Last so you keep trying and because Doubt is all you know you assume GOD is trying to deceive you. so you fight as if your life is at stake; GOD plays the game to play the game. all starts at GOD and is filtered through Doubt but Doubt cannot change the end result because Doubt is linear. YOU ARE A PERFECT BEING AND EVERY "MISTAKE" YOU HAVE EVER MADE WAS FOR A PURPOSE! that's why the Church talks about faith and non-doubt and all that crap. they themselves do not understand it, but lucky for them their herder led them in the RIGHT direction. Prayer alters chance and is as real as everything else you can't understand.
 
Stimpson J. Cat said:
Answer,

I hate to be rude, but you seem to be a bit confused. This is the Science and Mathematics forum, not the Incoherent Nonsense forum.

Dr. Stupid

not this again, i have no tolerance left for morons. don't contribute to a scientific oriented thread unless you understand the subject matter. it's only nonsense because you are an idiot, comprende?
 
Answer said:
TEN dimensions. if you even bothered to read anything about string theory you would know that the remaining 6 dimensions are beyond the visualization capacity of the human brain; in fact, StringTheory=ZERO. visualize NOTHING and you visualize all dimensions.
M-Theory

M-theory is the unknown theory of everything which would combine all five superstring theories and 11-dimensional supergravity together.

One-dimensional strings, which are smaller than any subatomic particle, are believed to exist inside atoms. Strings are lines that can be straight, curled and circular. Note well that these strings do not extend beyond their 1st dimension, and using advanced physics mathematics equations to explain all matter seen and unseen scientists have given arguments for existence of the 4th dimension and upwards to 26. Three dimensions explain mass or objects. But now we must step outside our world when we study Einstein's theories of special relativity and general relativity and go to other dimensions - to 12 dimensions or even more.


If you bothered to read anything about String Theory, you would probably know that.
 
Answer said:


not this again, i have no tolerance left for morons. don't contribute to a scientific oriented thread unless you understand the subject matter. it's only nonsense because you are an idiot, comprende?


:id: :id: :id: :id:
 
Answer said:
not this again, i have no tolerance left for morons. don't contribute to a scientific oriented thread unless you understand the subject matter. it's only nonsense because you are an idiot, comprende?
From Stimpson's Personal Homepage - Education:
Bachelors of Science in Physics, University of Missouri at St. Louis, 1996.

Masters of Science in Physics, University of Missouri at St. Louis, 1997.

Ph.D. in Physics, University of Missouri Rolla/St. Louis joint Ph.D. Physics program, 2000.

Ph.D. Research done at the Center for Neurodynamics, under Professor Frank Moss.
Who are you calling an idiot?
 
Yahweh said:

M-Theory

M-theory is the unknown theory of everything which would combine all five superstring theories and 11-dimensional supergravity together.

One-dimensional strings, which are smaller than any subatomic particle, are believed to exist inside atoms. Strings are lines that can be straight, curled and circular. Note well that these strings do not extend beyond their 1st dimension, and using advanced physics mathematics equations to explain all matter seen and unseen scientists have given arguments for existence of the 4th dimension and upwards to 26. Three dimensions explain mass or objects. But now we must step outside our world when we study Einstein's theories of special relativity and general relativity and go to other dimensions - to 12 dimensions or even more.


If you bothered to read anything about String Theory, you would probably know that.

all is lost on the educated-idiots. you want to know how many dimensions there are? AS MANY AS YOU IMAGINE THERE TO BE. ALL THEORIES ARE CORRECT.

still don't get it, do you? put all of you educated-idiots into one room and you could not light it up. how easily fooled you are.. how gullible..
 
Answer,

not this again, i have no tolerance left for morons. don't contribute to a scientific oriented thread unless you understand the subject matter. it's only nonsense because you are an idiot, comprende?

That's pretty funny. I was thinking exactly the same thing. You have made it abundantly obvious that you know absolutely nothing about Quantum Mechanics, String Theory, or even basic mathematics. You are making an ass of yourself. Please stop crapping up a perfectly good thread with your pseudo-scientific religious babble.

There are several real physicists on this forum (myself included). You are going to find that people here are not impressed with your ability to use scientific jargon in order to make it sound like you know what you are talking about.

You are just making a fool of yourself. For you own sake, please stop.


Dr. Stupid
 
Stimpson J. Cat said:
Answer,



That's pretty funny. I was thinking exactly the same thing. You have made it abundantly obvious that you know absolutely nothing about Quantum Mechanics, String Theory, or even basic mathematics. You are making an ass of yourself. Please stop crapping up a perfectly good thread with your pseudo-scientific religious babble.

There are several real physicists on this forum (myself included). You are going to find that people here are not impressed with your ability to use scientific jargon in order to make it sound like you know what you are talking about.

You are just making a fool of yourself. For you own sake, please stop.


Dr. Stupid

well well, "Professor".. do you admit that at a quantum-level there exists both the possible and impossible?
 
Re: Re: Cern and String Theory

Tez said:


1. Yes, LHC will find something (if it reaches the energies and luminosities planned). This is because the Standard Model (incorporating everything we do have direct experimental evidence for) breaks down at energies lower than LHC will attain -and thus something beyond the standard model must be found...


What relevance (if any) does reported experimental evidence for nuclear supersymmetry (Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 1542) have to this discussion?

Btw, I once heard that to obtain direct experimental evidence of string theory itself, we would require a 'solar-system sized' collider to accelerate particles to the necessary energies.
 
Answer said:


well well, "Professor".. do you admit that at a quantum-level there exists both the possible and impossible?

i'm glad there exists someone for the sheep to look to, as i predicted: the physicst will evaluate it.

do you deny that reality is non-local?
do you deny that a quantum consciousness is responsble for the wavefunction collapse?
 
Answer,

well well, "Professor".. do you admit that at a quantum-level there exists both the possible and impossible?

First of all, I am not a Professor. I am what is known in academia as a Post-Doc. As to your question, it is far to vague for me to answer in a meaningful way.

i'm glad there exists someone for the sheep to look to, as i predicted: the physicst will evaluate it.

Well, there's your first mistake. There aren't many sheep around here. Like I said, there are several physicists on this board, and many other people who know more than enough about QM to recognize your blather for the nonsense it is.

do you deny that reality is non-local?

I don't know whether it is or not. All I know is that if it is deterministic, then it must also be non-local.

do you deny that a quantum consciousness is responsible for the wavefunction collapse?

First of all, I don't have any idea what "quantum consciousness" means. Second, wavefunction collapse is not a physical event. The wavefunction is an abstract mathematical tool for predicting probabilities of events occurring. Your question presupposes the metaphysical claim that the wavefunction directly represents whatever the true "ontological existent" is. This may or may not be true. Since it is a metaphysical, rather than a scientific claim, I am not going to waste my time speculating about it.


Dr. Stupid
 
AND.. as should be obvious to anyone who has even a tenuous grasp on quantum mechanics.. reality is non-local and there exists a consciousness that sees through our eyes and is responsible for the creation of these quanta.

Quantum mechanics is a set of equations that describe the statistical behavior of matter and forces (except gravity) at the atomic and sub atomic scale. There are various interpretations as to what these equations imply about the nature of reality but there is no general consensus as to which, if any, of these interpretations is correct.

It is not at all obvious that quantum mechanics implies the existence of a consciousness that is responsible for the creation of quanta. This is merely another rather dubious interpretation.
 

Back
Top Bottom