Ernie M
Graduate Poster
I didn't forget to post.
I'm having a slow-go at some things.
This is all I can write here tonight.
I'm having a slow-go at some things.
This is all I can write here tonight.
ErnieM's story about getting the runaround at the court houses s interesting and I want to see where he goes with it.
My impression is that the real life court system is a miserable pile of bureaucracy, paperwork, and rescheduled hearings. Without being privy to the conversations between the actual participants (attorneys, judges, plaintiffs, defendants, etc.), it's impossible to arrive at any concrete conclusions about what's going on.
I imagine that if the family requests it not be a media case that might have some sway, Ryan's father is in law enforcement. That might have been a professional courtesy extended to him
"It looks like a high-quality show," he said. "It'll be great exposure for the university. There's no way we could afford to buy that much air time on a major network."
“to avoid any appearance of conflict of interest due to real or perceived connections” to Sandusky, the Second Mile charity Sandusky founded, or Penn State, the release states.
No explanation for the recusal was available Thursday and no official motion had been filed, according to court administrators.
Buell is a recovering addict (and good for him). He is still active in paranormal events up and down the east coast according to his Twitter page.
This is his blog: http://www.ryanbuell.org/blog
ErnieM's story about getting the runaround at the court houses s interesting and I want to see where he goes with it.
It is unclear to me why you have this interest in Buell now, and in particular the interest in the old court case that had nothing to do with his activities as a ghost hunter.
It is unclear to me why you have this interest in Buell now, and in particular the interest in the old court case that had nothing to do with his activities as a ghost hunter.
It is unclear to me why you have this interest in Buell now, and in particular the interest in the old court case that had nothing to do with his activities as a ghost hunter.
Buell is a recovering addict (and good for him). He is still active in paranormal events up and down the east coast according to his Twitter page.
This is his blog: http://www.ryanbuell.org/blog
ErnieM's story about getting the runaround at the court houses s interesting and I want to see where he goes with it.
This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States
Ryan Buell, from the short lived "Paranormal State" might be going away for a while:
http://abc11.com/1520780/
To save you time, Buell has been promoting paranormal events and conferences, and then canceling them without refunds.
I watched the show during its brief run on A&E, and as soon as Loraine Warren showed up and became a regular I smelled a rat.
My impression is that the real life court system is a miserable pile of bureaucracy, paperwork, and rescheduled hearings. Without being privy to the conversations between the actual participants (attorneys, judges, plaintiffs, defendants, etc.), it's impossible to arrive at any concrete conclusions about what's going on.
I'm sure there is a lot to this part of the story. Pennsylvania politics is frustrating because depending on which county you're in you can be in the 21st Century or under some blend of Hessian/British-inspired rule, and everything in between.
Ernie,
Please explain whether you have legal standing in this case, and if so, on what basis.
Thank you.
xterra
[For reasons unknown to me, the quote function doesn't work, so I had to copy and paste the relevant portion of your posting.]Are you asking if I was harmed by attending some of Buell's criminal proceedings, therefore have a "legal standing" to prove three elements (1) Injury in Fact; (2) Causation; and (3) Redressability, as a claimant, AND that I am in the process of, or have, brought that cause of action against the other party(s)?
[For reasons unknown to me, the quote function doesn't work, so I had to copy and paste the relevant portion of your posting.]Are you asking if I was harmed by attending some of Buell's criminal proceedings, therefore have a "legal standing" to prove three elements (1) Injury in Fact; (2) Causation; and (3) Redressability, as a claimant, AND that I am in the process of, or have, brought that cause of action against the other party(s)?
Yes, that's what I am asking. If your interest in the case is because you are a concerned citizen, rather than someone with legal standing, that might explain the reason you're getting resistance from the court and Buell's attorney.
Similarly, if you're not an accredited reporter, they might push back.
I'm not a lawyer, and don't play one on TV or in movies, so I might be speculating totally from ignorance here.
[For reasons unknown to me, the quote function doesn't work, so I had to copy and paste the relevant portion of your posting.]
Yes, that's what I am asking. If your interest in the case is because you are a concerned citizen, rather than someone with legal standing, that might explain the reason you're getting resistance from the court and Buell's attorney.
Similarly, if you're not an accredited reporter, they might push back.
I'm not a lawyer, and don't play one on TV or in movies, so I might be speculating totally from ignorance here.
[1]"...also a writer and correspondent for Investigation Discovery’s CrimeFeed website."