• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cannabis commercialization question

A few posts have been removed. Please keep the discussion civil, on topic, and do not stray into discussion of potentially illegal actions on the part of yourselves or other members. The subject matter is the commercialization of cannabis from a presumption of legality point of view and it needs to stay that way. Thanks in advance.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
 
LashL said:
A few posts have been removed. Please keep the discussion civil, on topic, and do not stray into discussion of potentially illegal actions on the part of yourselves or other members. The subject matter is the commercialization of cannabis from a presumption of legality point of view and it needs to stay that way. Thanks in advance.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
Click to expand...
The essence of this discussion is whether people will grow their own, or buy it commercially. Because that will have tremedeous impact on the economy of a legalization. Surely it will be a combination of both, but we can't really discuss which of the two will be more dominating, and henceforth the economy of the phenomenon, without discussing the quality of the various products.
I will refer the quality discussion to the annual cannabis cup in Amsterdam, as this is the best measure we have so far since it's virtually the only place where it's legal in smaller amounts. The rest must be a case for the future.

To those of you who wonder why I don't answer/counter when talked to in this thread, then all I can say is that my posts constantly get moved or deleted for various reasons. The evidence is there, but it's illegal to re(e)fer to it. Carry on.
 
The city of Oakland CA is showing how government is determined to kill the goose and extract all of her golden eggs:
Oakland's City Council late Tuesday adopted regulations permitting industrial-scale marijuana farms, a plan that some small farmers argued would squeeze them out of the industry they helped to build.

...The regulations will require applicants to have a minimum of $3 million worth of insurance, hire security and pay a $211,000 annual permit fee.
Click to expand...
A $211,000 annual permit fee?

Further evidence of my contention that government regulation and taxation will be so onerous that people will just grow their own.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom