Captain.Sassy
Master Poster
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2009
- Messages
- 2,236
Oops! Don't thank me yet. I posted the provision that was actually struck down!
I meant to post this:
213.(1)(c) has been struck, therefore johns cannot be charged under that provision. But they could be charged under (a) or (b) if the circumstances were correct.
OIC
Well, that actually leaves a lot of room for johns to solicit sex. I guess so long as you're not blocking traffic, you're ok.