------
If we "simply don't know", then how do you conclude it's an exaggeration? might it not be an understatement?
I have seen (and recorded) a documentary made by English scientist.
You can find a lot of evidence that shows that CO2 have no or mush less effect.
I will not go in details,
it’s not my point either , it’s easy to find all these argument at the internet. But it is not science that now a days takes over, - but emotions.
What had happen the last 5 years is mass hysteria.
What had happen the last 100 years is that the ice is melting, right, - but for 1000 years ago it were 1 degree warmer by Greenland.
But as I wrote there are "many opposite argument” on both side, it really leads nowhere.
Notice all of the peaks in the temperature that are not in the magnetic field strength? They show that there are other things causing the temperature to change.
Right
And these “other things” are the moving MNP, sometime in an area with bad magnetic conductivity and some times in an area with bad magnetic conductivity.
Read the writings on the wall >>
http://www.science27.com/Earth/b.jpg
As you easy can see, - when MNP moves (a lot) and into areas with
poor magnetic conductivity, - the strength of the Earths Magnetic fields is weakening.
This is the one factor responsible for the strength of the Magnetic Field.
The other reason is the strength of the solar wind.
The first influence we
must learn to control, -
if possible.
A new Ice age could start any time.
We should prepare us self to trap MNP in the Arctic Ocean, in the big positive magnetic anomaly. ( or at the Northern Greenland).
At least build power stations (maybe on the inland ice) and starts to experiment, if we can affects the motion of MNP.
If we can we can keep MNP quite we can certainly control the Earths temperature..
Read the full background for claiming this
here
I vote for moving the Earth further out from the Sun
I know what I claims is a “funny idea” .
But it is not funny the day million of people must move south, and leave there countries to the ice.
I mean we are willing to spend 50 billion USD to search a (fantasy) higgs (that not exist) – How must are we willing to spend to at least trying to see, is it possible that we can protect us from the next ice age, (that only a idiot believe never will come again) ?
That day could come sooner as you believe.
A BIG ice age could be here with full power in less as 100 years.
A small ice age could be here in few years.
I don’t believe it require must energy to affect / trap the motion of MNP.
What does the magnetic field have to do with global warming?
The Earths magnetic field and its temperature are coincident.
The cause of that is that the solar activity is responsible for the magnetic field on the Earth.
To understand the background for the thread, you must read
this and
this
My friend in Melbourne was experiencing the highest temperatures in a century there a couple of weeks ago. Meanwhile, I was freezing in the snow in the UK. That means global warming's a hoax, right
There are strong arguments on both side.
But we don’t know the cause of temperature changing’s.
We even don’t know what causing something so dramatically as ice ages.
We have A LOT more to learn.
We are forces to seriously to listen to all theories, also Henrik Svensmark.
Time will prove if the solar activity is very important and main responsible.
The next 10 years we could learn that lesson.
It takes time to cool down the earth. The ocean is a huge heat accumulator. Exactly in these years a new ice age could very well be starting.
The next 10 to 20 year will properly learn us a lot more of the secrets of the Sun.
I hope we in the coming years will se how the solar activity is connected with the temperature on Earth.
But to understand this mechanism
completely we also
must understand why there is coincidence between the Earths magnetic field and the temperatures here on the planet..
------
Edited by Locknar:
Breach of Rule 4 removed; please do not hotlink to copyrighted material.
