Can PsyOps Win the Jihad?

[Darat]

we should be very very carefull here...If Muslims get wind of this they may retaliate by showing our troops Crucifixes and wearing Garlic cloves....

Hang on, or is that for vampires?

Well no - since the majority of "us" are Christians (for example the majority of USA armed forces are Christian) all that will be necessary is for the Muslim terrorists to remind the forces arraigned against them that Jesus said "turn the other cheek" (the Christians who joined up must have forgotten that bit of Jesus teachings). Obviously then all the Christians will drop their weapons and accept what ever the Muslim terrorists wish to do to them.

Obviously as well if there are any Jews among the forces against them they can use the "pork weapons of mass damnation" back at the Jewish forces.

 

[SteveGrenard]

I don't know if anyone agrees with me but I would like to hear from others on Claus' post below. As the target of his slander and rebukes, I feel he has now reached a new low. I have reported the post to the moderators and have asked for disicplinary action and a retraction and apology.

In this post Mr. Larsen responds to my statements that I do not engage in terrorist activities such as flying planes into buildings by saying I am fantasizing. He has accused me, de facto, of terrorist actions and this is a very serious accusation.

Originally Posted by SteveGrenard :

I am not launching rockets into the houses of innocent civilians, nor am I flying planes into office buildings, nor am I waging jihad to impose my religion, killing millions worldwide (e.g. Sudan) in the process. And most importantly I am proposing that a non-lethal remedy be found to combat a heinous, barbaric enemy who is willing to die for their religious beliefs, an enemy that is sick and very disturbed if not misguided.

CF Larsen wrote:

Steve, you obviously haven't thought this through. But do keep fantasizing: The more elaborate your scenario has to be, the funnier it gets.

 

[Darat]

Claus is referring to your fantasies of using pork weapons of mass damnation against Muslim terrorists.

 

[Jon_in_london]

Can PsyOps Win the Jihad?

No.

Because US and Israeli military doctrine is stoopid.

 

[Darat]

Several posts removed, please keep to subjects appropriate for this section of the forum and to your Membership Agreement.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat

 

[SteveGrenard]

Darat:

Obviously as well if there are any Jews among the forces against them they can use the "pork weapons of mass damnation" back at the Jewish forces.

Incorrect. Orthodox Jews cannot eat pork but there is no prohibition of looking at it, touching it, wearing it, throwing it around (footballs of pig skin) or even being doused in it. Moslems cannot only not eat it except by accident or if they are starving, but they cannot look, touch, wear or deal with it in anyother way as well. The Jews have the edge as they can touch and use pork products but their extremist fanatic islamic enemies cannot.

In addition there are many sects within Judaism, and conservative and reformed Jews may eat pork and tend not keep kosher households.

 

[Darat]

Darat:

Incorrect.

No correct.

...snip...
Moslems cannot only not eat it except by accident or if they are starving,

Like Jews.

but they cannot look, touch, wear or deal with it in anyother way as well.

Yes they can - I have already provided links demonstrating this is not correct.

The Jews have the edge as they can touch and use pork products but their extremist fanatic islamic enemies cannot.

You have not yet shown that the "extremist fanatic Islamic enemies cannot". Also if you mean "extremist fanatic Islamic enemies" are people like the ones who carried out the attacks on 9/11 then that demonstrates your basic assumptions about their religious adherence are incorrect.

In addition there are many sects within Judaism, and conservative and reformed Jews may eat pork and tend not keep kosher households.

As there are Muslims sects.

 

[HarryKeogh]

As there are Muslims sects.

but are there Muslim sects that freely eat pork like some Jewish sects?

 

[Darat]

but are there Muslim sects that freely eat pork like some Jewish sects?

I believe there are some - such as groups of Bosnians who identify themselves as Muslims.

 

[SteveGrenard]

All related to EATING pork, not touching it such as having a pigskin wallet in one's pocket.

Why would devout Albanian-Kosovar-Bosnian moslems not observe halal?

The prohibition against eating and touching is in deuterotomy. Reformed jews dont buy this anymore. If you or Larsen are saying they are supposed to, then I suppose a lot of reformed jews will be going to hell I guess.

Please tell me darat that orthodox jewish children are prohibited from watching porky pig cartoons or sesame street when miss piggy is one. Or save their shekels in a piggy bank. Or toss around a football. On the other hand the whacko devout moslem extremists who number in the many many millions start riots over cartoons. They demand pig statues be removed from their public view. They are insulted by graven images of pigs for gosh sakes. Tell me jews are also.

By the way, what are your plans darat when the jihad bus reaches your street?



-----------------all below are quotes with relevant URLs beneath:

Orthodox Judaism and Conservative Judaism hold that Jews SHOULD follow the laws of kashrut. Some of Reform Judaism and Reconstructionist Judaism think that these laws are no longer binding to them. Some parts of the Reform community have begun to move towards a more traditional position.[citation needed] This tradition-leaning faction agrees with mainstream Reform that the rules concerning kashrut are no longer binding to them, but holds that keeping kosher is an important way for people to bring holiness into their lives. Thus Jews are encouraged to consider adopting some or all of the rules of kashrut on a voluntary basis. The Reconstructionist movement advocates that its members accept some of the rules of kashrut, but does so in a non-binding fashion; their stance on kashrut is the same as the tradition-leaning wing of Reform.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashrut


Liberal Jewish movement. Reform communities vary, but tend to question the authority of the Talmud (Jewish laws). Reform Jews deny that the Jews are a chosen people, and some reject belief in the Messiah, and heaven and hell. There is less adherence to avoiding the melachot (work forbidden on the Sabbath), and kosher (dietary) rules are often relaxed, but may be observed on synagogue premises. Women and men sit together in the service, which may not be conducted completely in Hebrew; and women take a full part in the services, including becoming rabbis. Synagogues may be called temples.

http://www.tiscali.co.uk/reference/encyclopaedia/hutchinson/m0098285.html


Some Jews today consider Jewish dietary laws to be ancient health regulations that are no longer necessary as a result of modern methods of food preparation. Others are not knowledgeable about kosher laws. And others yet, who may view Jewish dietary laws as important and who may have knowledge of them, may chose not to observe them because of the added expense and inconvenience their observance can entail.

http://kosherfood.about.com/od/kosherfaq/f/jewskeepkosh.htm