Donn
Philosopher
All rather OT. Lord Xenu will be most pleased.
Jesus never existed, I traveled back in time and prevented the birth.
I had to destroy all evidence of the time machine.
Yestermorrow.
Leumas -- you might consider changing your approach a little bit. I agree with some of what you are saying, but there is no need to be so caustic about it. The highlighting and formatting does not help either.
And you can add me to the list of someone who has no idea what a "Christian atheist" is.
Odd way of stopping.
....
Do I find Christianity important? Yes, but only because it is a part of our culture. I don't find any form of religion important as a religion in itself both in the negative and positive sense. To fight a religion simply because it is a religion is to attach to much importance to the concept of religion. Further I don't believe that you can be certain that only be fighting to remove religion "as something bad", that you can be certain that it is replaced with something better.
In other words, yes, you can fight the bad guys, but what do you want to replace it with? I.e. what is your positive version of a better world, Leumas?
With regards
Interesting take, Leumas. You are saying that if someone is stupid, credulous, ignorant, or unenlightened, then the only acceptable manner in which to deal with him is to belittle, berate, and insult his mental status.
Because this will apparently fix it.
Interesting take, Leumas. You are saying that if someone is stupid, credulous, ignorant, or unenlightened, then the only acceptable manner in which to deal with him is to belittle, berate, and insult his mental status.
Because this will apparently fix it.
It's an atheist that still has his mother's words in his heart, "Denying Christ is the worst thing you can do".
This must come in handy when Jesus applies for loans.
An itinerant preacher with no steady income? Loan deni... oh, wait! The applicant is Jesus! I can't deny him, so loan approved.
Interesting take, Leumas. You are saying that if someone is stupid, credulous, ignorant, or unenlightened, then the only acceptable manner in which to deal with him is to belittle, berate, and insult his mental status.
Because this will apparently fix it.
<snip what was a strawman sign but that was childishly sabotaged to reflect some juvenile antics.>
In the spirit of speculation that seems to drive some Christian Atheists to assert that Jesus must surely have had a natural explanation behind all his magic....
![]()
How devilishly juvenile!
I see what happened here... I borrowed the link to a strawman sign that Smartcookie was using in this post, to use in my above post.
He apparently has control over that image and thus goes and changes it in a juvenile attempt at sabotaging my post.
Serves me right for borrowing what I did not know was his image.
But what he has failed to notice is that he has also sabotaged his own post which now looks like below.
And if he tries to change it again this post will reflect that.
In using that image you violated Rule 5
Perhaps next time you'll ask me before you have the cheek to use images from MY dropbox account!!
You are right.... I apologize for borrowing your image.... I did not even see it was YOUR image.... I thought it was a stock image like many available on the internet.... I did not even look at the url.
Also thanks for teaching me something I have not thought about.... I have been storing my images for usage on this forum on the ISF images area... I did not think about using images from my own cloud.... thanks for the lesson.
You're welcome.
Dropbox is excellent for this task, you just drag the image into your public folder and link it.
My response is your very own post but reworded from the other side of the rabbit's hole.
Do I findChristianityignorance important? Yes, but only because it is a part of our culture. I don't find any form ofreligionstupidity important as areligioncredulousness in itself both in the negative and positive sense. To fighta religionnonsense simply because it isa religionbenightedness is to attach too much importance to the concept ofreligionenlightenment. Further I don't believe that you can be certain that only by fighting to removereligionabsurdity "as something bad", that you can be certain that it is replaced with something better.
In other words, yes, you can fightthe bad guysgullibility, hucksterism, stupidity, benightedness, superstition, irrationality, fear, coercion, shysterism, bigotry, xenophobia, prejudice, wishful thinking, irrationality, illogic, but what do you want to replace it with? I.e. what is your positive version of a better world,LeumasTommy Jeppesen?
Equally With regards
This is the absolute most meaningless conversation ever.
How are we supposed to have a conversation on any intellectual level with one side going "Yeah but you can't prove that an invisible giant sky wizard didn't change the entire rules of reality at some point in the past to make an impossible thing happen."
That's a somehow even more anti-intellectual version of "I'm just gonna make stuff up at random."
