If we take into account the Lunar Landing Module LM was a prototype which never had been properly tested...
Except that it wasn't a prototype, it was the fifth flight-qualified article. And it was properly tested.
And yes, as a fully-qualified aerospace engineer I can teach at least an hour-long lecture off the top of my head on the testing regime of the lunar module. But unfortunately
you made the claim that it
wasn't properly tested. That means the onus is on you. The test regime that the LM was subjected to is a matter of documentation. It's up to you to show why that was insufficient or inappropriate. Your claim = your burden of proof.
By the way, isn't the blue, maybe ocean-reflected color on the sun-side of the Command Module strong evidence that the photo is a photomontage?
I don't see anything in the light reflected from the command module that I don't expect to see. But then again I know what substances the coating of the CM were made from, and their optical properties.
You seem to be claiming it's reflecting an ocean. Your claim = your burden of proof.
My use of above and below (beneath) was both with respect to the CSM (Command and Service Module) and with respect to the moon.
Except your use of "above" and "beneath" in your original most was all over the map, covering both transposition and docking and the lunar orbit checkout, both the static arrangement of the spacecraft components in the launch vehicle and the dynamic relative positions of the spacecraft in lunar orbit. You just threw a bunch of mud against the wall and hoped some of it stuck.
If what you write is intended as more than pure disinformation then please provide some evidence. By the way, we are dealing with a photo having been taken shortly after undocking...
...after which the two spacecraft were pursuing different orbits, one of which took the LM higher than the CM for a portion of the orbit. You don't understand how orbits work.
In any case, future will show who is lying by naïveté, by implication or even by intention.
No, the present shows it adequately. You have absolutely no clue how these spacecraft were designed, built, tested, and flown. All your threads demonstrate this. And you think everyone else is as ignorant as you, such that you can just spout nonsense and no one will catch you.
You've provided absolutely zero evidence to support the claims you're making here, and a lot of people are still trying to figure out what your claims are. You seem to think the arrangement of the spacecraft and the Moon as depicted in the photo is self-evidently wrong. Please fill in the gaps in your argument so that it's clear what you're actually claiming is wrong. We can't read your mind.
