Do you know a concrete example?
Practically the entirety of lunar EVA stations in the J-missions. They all show the behavior of dust kicked by astronauts as they walk.
It is difficult to find Apollo film sequences where it is easy to count steps or jumps and estimate speed.
Why would you say that? All your references are to YouTube, so I daresay you haven't surveyed enough of the Apollo record, or know its customary sources, to make this determination. If you use the actual sources instead of convenience sources you find on the web, perhaps you'll have more luck.
It seems obvious that this Apollo 11 stuff has been filmed under terrestrial and not lunar gravity. The whole looks strange because it has been captured at a very low frame rate but is shown at "fast motion". The movements of the astronauts are quite unnatural (like in old films of Charlie Chaplin).
Nope. Ditto the rest of the paranoid fantasy that forms most of the rest of this post. You simply look at at a small sample of video and decide it has all been faked. For Apollo 12, for example, you say NASA hid their inability to simulate low gravity by simply not having the television camera work. You apparently don't realize there was 16mm film shot on the mission.
...far from what JayUtah in #33 considers a "decent velocity".
Straw man. I was discussing the fantastic velocities you suggest would have been possible. I was asking you to solve the dynamics problems that would arise from such velocity. You didn't do so, which suggests you realize it would be absurd to expect such reckless horizontal velocities. My point, which you missed entirely, is that the conservative speed you generally see in Apollo film is prudent for the conditions. No anomaly, no need to explain it.
You can't have your cake and eat it too. Either the astronauts, according to your argument, should have been going roughly as fast as I said -- with all the attendant dynamics problems that you lack the skill to understand or quantify -- or they should have been moving at the slower speeds we see, that you conjecturally attribute to fakery.
Yes, humans have a much faster step rate than you see in the Apollo videos when in normal Earth gravity and not wearing restrictive clothing. You neglect that diminished gravity and clothing that was intentionally restrictive would not allow such a step rate. What we see in the Apollo videos is exactly what we expect to see under the purported circumstances. You claim this is achieved by slowing down filmed action. This requires an actor to maintain high step rates and jump rates in restrictive costumes for considerable uninterrupted time. This was tested on the program I mentioned. It is not sustainable, and when slowed down it does not produce the same effect as we see in Apollo motion pictures.
If this is true then such an assisted jump makes look the other non-assisted jumps even more suspicious.
How so?
Besides, your claim was that no feats of diminished gravity appeared in the record. You are simply factually wrong. Instead of owning that error, which obviously derives from your inattentive and incomplete survey of the evidence, you simply ran off in a new direction and accused it of being "assisted." Coming on the heels of your prior failed claim that was also based on relative inexperience with the evidence, you should have been more careful about asserting what is or isn't so in this body of evidence.
Sorry, none of this is convincing. You obviously have seen only very little of the relevant film, so your attempts to characterize it all as fake fall comically flat. You have clearly done no computations or tests to validate your hypothesis. Your argument boils down simply to looking at a few minutes of video and declaring your opinion that it's fake. Arguments from incredulity are not convincing, especially to people around here, many of whom are quite familiar with the Apollo record.
