Calling all Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists

Hans said:
I declare this thread to stupid to continue....don't make me come back here and mock you all I can be VERY condescending.
Click to expand...

Reported. Your post doesn't have a sign on it saying, "Pentagon", so it can't be a real post.


Things must be real busy over at that other forum where he's showing the whole world both their members what a bunch of meanies we are.

Or maybe Craig, Aldo, and Cap'n Robbie have an error limit for their spawn? Once you make twenty errors in a single thread, they do a Doctor Evil and dump you off your chair into a fiery furnace? Have they had to reel him in?
 
As a veteran I'm not likely to forget those and their families that have given us their all and paid the ultimate price.
 
Hey, he sure showed us!

This is about the average staying power of most of the PFFFFT and CIT stooges. I think they have like a Dune training center where they toss their most pig-headed and stubborn members and see if they can survive two or three weeks on Arrakis, and then send them over here.
They can keep it up for a few days and a few dozen or hundred posts, but eventually get so whupped that they crawl off into the corner, and like a mean old alley cat that wandered into a wolverine den, lick their wounds and stare at their masters planning their revenge.
Problem is, with this method of training and their nearly zero interest in their forums, they can't train up new gladiators more than every six months or so.

He'll be back. But not until the scars have healed over, and they've pumped him up with more "Attaboy, Bro!" courage.
 
You've gotta see his comments in the "Shut down the 911 Conspiracy Section?" thread. Before he realized he'd had his butt whupped completely, he posted that if we shut down the sub-forum it'd show the internet what a bunch of cowards we are.

Another Robcraigaldo stooge hoisted on his own petard. In his own thread, too!
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Not arguing there wasn't a plane.
Edited by Tricky: 
Edited for civility.
It just wasn't where your government says it was.

They're lying SOBs And it's just been proven. What plane parts? No come on lets see your evidence on here so I can blow it away?
Edited by Tricky: 
Edited for civility.
Click to expand...

Troller ignored.
Always coming to JREF instead of taking such " evidence " to the proper authorities..
Reminds me of the other " suck " puppets.
 
You leave a forum alone for a few weeks and THIS is what happens?! I can't believe I missed it.

There's absolutely no WAY this guy is British; "Old Boy", "Old Chum", "Guv" - What?! All we needed was a few 'Lawks!', and some 'Gor Blimey!'s, followed by a chorus of 'Knees Ap Mavver Brown!', and we would have had a textbook case of 'This is How All Brit Stereotypes Speak', by A Foreigner. I have never even heard a Cockney speak like that, never mind ANYONE British.

So there's your first lie Roscoe me old chummy cock-sparrer, feller-me-lad!

Secondly; if you're really British, then why are you saying 'we' and waving around the US constitution (or whatever that photo was)? You didn't answer that one.

If you're so convinced by the 'False Memory' theory and use it to write off the witness testimony of those that saw a 'plane hit the Pentagon, then could the same not apply to the witnesses you cite? Given that the witnesses that describe or suggest a plane hit The Pentagon are backed up by physical evidence, isn't it more likely that the witnesses you cite invented a false memory of a 'plane flying over The Pentagon rather than deal with the horrific fact of a passenger plane crashing into a Government building? That is just as plausible, except for the small matter of the contradictory hard evidence.

And speaking of the hard evidence, this is the road you're going down:

It’s about time the truth came out. The ‘Official Story’ is a lie. CIT and the ‘No Planers’ have been right all along. I have an American friend who is ex-CIA and is no longer in America for personal safety reasons. He has provided me with documents (which I no longer have) which explain the whole ‘attack’ on the Pentagon on Sep 11 2001. This is what happened, based on the documents he provided:

There was a passenger plane – that much is true, but the passenger manifests and the hi-jacking were all faked. A highly-skilled CIA pilot flew the (highly modified) plane towards DC and the Pentagon. Prior to Sep 11, under the cover of ‘renovation and repair work’, CIA operative installed boxes containing plane debris, body parts, chaff, and a homing beacon, against the walls at the proposed point of ‘impact’. Shaped charges were also fitted into the walls. On Sep 11, the CIA pilot flew the passenger plane along the trajectory which the homing beacon was sending, just prior to ‘impact’ he remotely triggered the shaped charges hidden in the Pentagon and executed a steep climb. The charges blew the walls out and in as planned, fake debris and body parts were scattered about and the chaff (written off as debris from the explosion) obfuscated the radar signal, giving the pilot time to pull up and away and become ‘lost’ in the confusion of the day. He later landed the plane at an undisclosed location.

Nobody saw the plane pull away as all eyes were on the explosion, and as people were expecting to see a plane impact the Pentagon, that is exactly what they saw. Exactly as planned by the perpetrators.

It looks like you were all wrong.
Click to expand...

That's a piss-take that I wrote in response to a no-planer's claims. Hand wave away all the hard evidence of a plane crash and all the eye-witness testimony, believe CIT and the above quote (or a variation of) is pretty much the only option left open to you.

If you think that sounds plausible then there is no helping you.
 
SatansMaleVoiceChoir said:
If you're so convinced by the 'False Memory' theory and use it to write off the witness testimony of those that saw a 'plane hit the Pentagon, then could the same not apply to the witnesses you cite? Given that the witnesses that describe or suggest a plane hit The Pentagon are backed up by physical evidence, isn't it more likely that the witnesses you cite invented a false memory of a 'plane flying over The Pentagon rather than deal with the horrific fact of a passenger plane crashing into a Government building? That is just as plausible, except for the small matter of the contradictory hard evidence.
Click to expand...

Small correction, none of them say the plane flew over. Its NOC which would be the false memory.

Btw your piss take is more or less exactly what CIT believe as far as I can see! haha
 
Last edited:
roscoe_the_first said:
Whilst you're all making jokes This is happening.

This thread is over. I'm tired of casting pearls before swine. Goodbye
Click to expand...

We tired of it back in 2006; what took you so damn long?

Ps. Here are some pearls you didn't seem to appreciate:
 
I'm still shocked at the arrogance and ignorance of roscoe_the_first calling what he has cast before us "pearls"
 
Last edited:
Edx said:
Small correction, none of them say the plane flew over. Its NOC which would be the false memory.
Click to expand...

Sorry, and thanks for the correction. You get my point though.

Edx said:
Btw your piss take is more or less exactly what CIT believe as far as I can see! haha
Click to expand...

It's either a last-minute pull up and trigger the explosives, or fire a missile into the Pentagon. Either way it's complete dog-toffee.
 
SatansMaleVoiceChoir said:
Sorry, and thanks for the correction. You get my point though.
Click to expand...

Oh sure, I only mention it because the idea that they found witness' that think they saw a plane fly over gives them way too much credit :D


It's either a last-minute pull up and trigger the explosives, or fire a missile into the Pentagon. Either way it's complete dog-toffee.
Click to expand...

I think they are definitely off the missile train, they like the fly over much more. I do chuckle everytime I imagine that happening.
 
Edx said:
Oh sure, I only mention it because the idea that they found witness' that think they saw a plane fly over gives them way too much credit :D




I think they are definitely off the missile train, they like the fly over much more. I do chuckle everytime I imagine that happening.
Click to expand...

It amazes me that these people expend so much effort on trying to twist the rules of mathematics to fit their impossible flightpath notions, or handwave away masses of evidence by simply saying the Government planted/fabricated it, yet they seem to ignore the massive questions which their beliefs raise:

If a plane didn't hit the Pentagon, and there are many, many witnesses who at least SAW a 'plane in the vicinity at the time of the 'event', then:

What DID hit the Pentagon?
Where are all the passengers?
Where is the 'plane?
Who or what are the bodies at the crash site?
How did all the bodies and 'plane debris 'suddenly' appear without anyone in/around the Pentagon noticing?

You cannot put forward CITs 'theory' as 'truth' and not address those questions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom