Calling all Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists

Too bad hand waving is not an olympic sport, old sport.

How many signs do you see on any of the thousands of Pentagon photos posted around the internet that actually say, "Pentagon"?

These guys are obviously doing it wrong...

secretnuclearbunkerthum.jpg


:jaw-dropp:jaw-dropp:jaw-dropp
 
Well no they're not. I'm not the one endorsing the blowing of arms and legs off kids.

Again, that's not what I endorse. Complete vaporization or the two pronged "Operation Candy Lure" and then a follow up "Operation Catch Them Out In The Open" attack is much more efficient than simply blowing off arms and legs...
 
Last edited:
So tell me precisely what Moussoui had to do with the 911 attacks?

Did you know that Moussoui was born and brought up in France by the way.

He was spared the death penalty, where is he now?

A foreign national convicted of conspiring to kill American citizens or in other words A prisoner of war. So when an American conspires to kill someone from another nation. What does this make him?

I don't get what you're trying to say with this post? You have your answer to your question in the bbc link...also this is a very feeble attempt to try and side step the issues I've brought up.

I'll ask you in a more clear way: is evidence that has been presented in a court of law that has not had it's authenticity disputed, the type of evidence that you would accept?
 
Thank you for that guess, now show me where the tail ended up?

The tail was most likely shattered like everything else that hits a brick wall at a couple hundred miles per hour. They aren't made of steel, you know. And you still haven't even dared to speculate on what, if not anm aircraft of the appropriate size and sahape, could have made the marks seen on the facade of the P-gon.

There are eye witnesses who saw the palne come in over the freeway SoC and hit the light poles and the generator. The damage to the generator is consistant with being hit by an aircraft.. One cable spool is where it was and the rest are scattered in a manner consistant with the officially reported approach path of the 757.

You have zero physical evidence for your tin-foil-wrapped crap.

We have plenty for the official narrative, printed right into the facade of the P-gon.

Only one of our positions can be correct. Eyewitness accounts plus structural damage consistant with several of the eye witness account is usually rock-solid evidence for the stated narrative.

You have balloon juice, unless you can name some instrument that would do the damage observed.
 
Thank you for that guess, now show me where the tail ended up?


So what? What answer would change the conclusion; essentially all of Flight 77 and bodily remains of all the occupants were recovered from the fire at the Pentagon.

The black boxes from flight 77 were recovered. How and where is described in Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11. Since the boxes are always located in the tail, that book answers your question.

But again, what difference does it make?
 
Not many. So show me what yer got that proves concusively that those pictures came from the Pentagon.

You see it's like this. The people I'm accusing are the people who are showing you what you blindly accept as evidence. See the problem?

The fact they were from the US District Court establishes that they were accepted and validated as genuine. The fact that the Moussaoui defense attorneys did not challenge them shows that even oppositional lawyers accepted them as fact. The fact that they also are supported by and in turn support the witness statements and DNA recovery gives them further validation. Your objection is facile and empty. The proof lays in their validation by the court system, their acceptance by even opposing counsel as well as those directly impacted by the event (family members, Pentagon staff, etc.), and the fact that they're not only not contradicted by any existing lines of evidence, but in fact are supported by them.

You cannot simply say "Prove It", as those photos have already been proven to have been taken at the Pentagon. If you doubt them, it is up to you to provide evidence why they're fake. Simple naysaying is nothing more than arguing from incredulity, and as such carries zero weight.

You prove they're not from the Pentagon. We're not blindly accepting the photos, we're convinced by the validation done by the court system and the investigative bodies of the photographs. You are the one commiting a blind act, since you are the one suggesting doubt about validated evidence.
 
Last edited:
kittens.
[qimg]http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/funny-pictures-four-stages-of-sleeping-kittens.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3051/2642345830_775ab71b77.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://limeshot.com/images/lolcats/funny-pictures-kitten-looks-for-bugs-in-your-computer.jpg[/qimg]


Even kittens cannot save this thread. :(
 
Thanks for that image. Just as my cat is staring at me :covereyes

It's not a problem until he picks up a boxcutter.

... and I just realized that I did a funny: I wrote "until", not "unless", thus demonstrating I hold a belief that kitty going slash-happy is inevitable. Well, dem things iz evil, dem kats, I knows it... :D

Be afraid. Be very afraid. :mglook
 
What about kittens with boxcutters?

No kittens with boxcutters (or light sabers) but I do have zombie kittens

funny-pictures-zombie-kitten-cat.jpg



http://porchtalk.com/upload/files/1/zombie_cat.jpg

and you use a boxcutter to get to this kitten
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_f98opUNuVXc/Sq9bkLG3cGI/AAAAAAAAKCc/ZRVJ9viJNes/s400/Box+kitten.jpg

and we do have squirrels with lightsabers. (damn you toke.... )
http://www.dayofthejedi.com/articles/2008/05/images/motivators/b/323.jpg

Edited by LashL: 
Removed hotlinked images. See Rule 5. Also, please note that Rule 10 also applies to images.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey Tri, I know that you got a laugh from the Pacman pie chart from a few months back and that if you're posting this late you probably have the watch so I present to you this (somewhat vaguely related to this thread) image.

[qimg]http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/2161/39773073358fe61b9d5f2dd.jpg[/qimg]

Sam

Yes, I was up on watch! That pic is HILLARIOUS!!!
 
Can you explain to me what this evidence had to do with Moussoui? He didn't do the attacks.

Of course they accepted them, they had nothing to do with case anyway.

He signed everything with "20th Hijacker" and admitted to everything, stipulated that what the government had set forth was fact, and plead guilty, and ASKED for the death penalty.
 
SO now page 18....any updates guys (I refuse to read even a single page of CIT/PFT discussion), or just more of the same old, same old?

TAM:)
 
SO now page 18....any updates guys (I refuse to read even a single page of CIT/PFT discussion), or just more of the same old, same old?

TAM:)

It has been the same old same old since 2006.
 
SO now page 18....any updates guys (I refuse to read even a single page of CIT/PFT discussion), or just more of the same old, same old?

TAM:)

Yep, just more maggots feeding on corpses.
 
But you do start enquiries when one of the 911 commission team says the original is flawed and they also say that the Pentagon witheld information from the Commission.
Wow, the same evidence for your delusions as CIT; lies, hearsay and moronic opinions based on ignorance. And you repeat your lies with every post.
 
I hear by rule all "evidence" presented by roscoe invalid on the basis that none of it has a big fat sign in the middle of the pictures that say Pentagon on them, period. Case Closed.
 
I declare this thread to stupid to continue....don't make me come back here and mock you all I can be VERY condescending.
 

Back
Top Bottom