Calling all Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists

[Edx]

Try this on Dov Zakheim 23 people on AA77 were involved in remote control of aircraft technology either directly or indirectly.

So?

But I'm mostly ignoring your stupid anti-semitic video and its quote-mines of PNAC. I like how it also mentions that the money went missing, but ignores that they had reconciled most of it. If you think Zakheim was lying, then why would Rumsfeld admit it couldn't be tracked in the first place? Your conspirators sure are dumb when you want them to be.

Does the FBI look at the Black Box data?

Read the following again and again until it sinks in....

1. It says the NTSB dont investigate crimes.

2. It says the FBI becomes the lead federal investigative body, with the NTSB providing any requested support.

Clearly the FBI are authorised to do what you claim they can't do, therefore you were wrong!

 

[roscoe_the_first]

So your own eyewitnesses are liars then? Quite a jam you got yourselves into.

My own eyewitnesses? That's funny.

They aren't lying. They all, to a person, saw a track to the north of the CITCO garage if that's so then the NTSB black box data is wrong and the light poles could not have been knocked down. Hey perhaps you should look at the evidence.

 

[roscoe_the_first]

So?

But I'm mostly ignoring your stupid anti-semitic video and its quote-mines of PNAC. I like how it also mentions that the money went missing, but ignores that they had reconciled most of it. If you think Zakheim was lying, then why would Rumsfeld admit it couldn't be tracked in the first place? Your conspirators sure are dumb when you want them to be.

Perhaps because he knew that the following day it wouldn't matter.

BTW I'm not anti-semitic. I like Arabs.

It says the NTSB dont investigate crimes!

It says the FBI the lead federal investigative body, with the NTSB providing any requested support!

Clearly the FBI are authorised to do what you claim they can't do! You were wrong!

So when the FBI move/remove evidence what does this do to the NTSB investigation?

 

[dtugg]

My own eyewitnesses? That's funny.

They aren't lying. They all, to a person, saw a track to the north of the CITCO garage if that's so then the NTSB black box data is wrong and the light poles could not have been knocked down. Hey perhaps you should look at the evidence.

They say they saw plane hit the Pentagon. You say they are lying about that. It's hilarious that you CITiots discredit your own witnesses. It's even more hilarious that you don't see the problem with that.

 

[Edx]

Perhaps because he knew that the following day it wouldn't matter.

So blabbed about the whole conspiracy to the worlds media, of course how silly of me. These conspirators sure love doing that according to you guys.

BTW I'm not anti-semitic. I like Arabs.

But hate Jews, presumably.

So when the FBI move/remove evidence what does this do to the NTSB investigation?

It wasn't an NTSB investigation it was an FBI investigation. The NTSB provided SUPPORT when REQUESTED BY the FBI.

 

[dafydd]

Certainly old boy please look at the first posting of this thread.

Get hold of a good dictionary and look up the word evidence.

 

[Foolmewunz]

Perhaps because he knew that the following day it wouldn't matter.

BTW I'm not anti-semitic. I like Arabs.



So when the FBI move/remove evidence what does this do to the NTSB investigation?

Most of your ilk pretend they're liberals and are merely anti-zionist. It's refreshing to see an openly bigoted person admit it, sometimes. Run along, now.

 

[dafydd]

Very likely. You'd better buck up all of you. Your performance so far ain't so good.

Your performance is abysmal.

 

[NutCracker]

Hello mr moderator. Do you want me to go and tell the rest of the internet the editorial bias that exists on this forum?

Editorial bias? You have been allowed to post your nonsense for how many pages?

But go on, tell the rest of the internet, cough cough, how biased JREF is. Go on. Because no matter what, the inevitable outcome of this is that you are going to declare victory of some sort to the rest, cough, cough, of the internet.

Look body, you have no evidence in favour of your contentions. Any evidence that contradicts your, hmm, theories, you claim is faked. Again without providing any supporting evidence.

Your theories are wrong. They are true in your head but they are false in the real world.

The claim that you are a moron is fully supported by evidence: the nonsense that you have spouted here. It is thus scientifically correct.

 

[Dumb All Over]

roscoe the first, earlier in the thread you said you would conduct your own independent inquiry and report the results here upon its completion. How's that independent inquiry going so far? Anything to report yet, old chum?

 

[NutCracker]

I love how he thinks "the rest of the Internet" cares what some moron troll thinks.

Truthers outnumber the official story worshippers, the Truth has found its way to every courtroom in the world. Wasn't it? 99% of all sites (that he visits, gnagna) are devoted to the Truth, something like that.

 

[roscoe_the_first]

They say they saw plane hit the Pentagon. You say they are lying about that. It's hilarious that you CITiots discredit your own witnesses. It's even more hilarious that you don't see the problem with that.

They're not lying they genuinely think they saw the plane hit the building. Trouble is some of them couldn't have done because their vision towards the Pentagon was obstructed.

Lagasse for example couldn't see the Pentagon because of trees in the way.

But they are not lying when it comes to all of then seeing the plane approach from over the Navy Annex and to the north of the CITCO garage. If this is so then the plane could not have hit the five light poles and the Black box data is incorrect.

 

[roscoe_the_first]

roscoe the first, earlier in the thread you said you would conduct your own independent inquiry and report the results here upon its completion. How's that independent inquiry going so far? Anything to report yet, old chum?

now who's being delusional?

 

[roscoe_the_first]

Editorial bias? You have been allowed to post your nonsense for how many pages?

But go on, tell the rest of the internet, cough cough, how biased JREF is. Go on. Because no matter what, the inevitable outcome of this is that you are going to declare victory of some sort to the rest, cough, cough, of the internet.

Look body, you have no evidence in favour of your contentions. Any evidence that contradicts your, hmm, theories, you claim is faked. Again without providing any supporting evidence.


Your theories are wrong. They are true in your head but they are false in the real world.

The claim that you are a moron is fully supported by evidence: the nonsense that you have spouted here. It is thus scientifically correct.

I got banned for 12 hours yesterday. It was OK for everyone else to break every house rule but not me. I did of course report this quite obvious and blatant bias over the internet.

I don't have any theories. I deliberately stop myself from having any. What I want is a full independent and international enquiry and an immediate moretoreum on all military operations.

I am not nor have I ever been a BOXCUTTER CONSPIRACY THEORIST.

 

[Bell]

I got banned for 12 hours yesterday. It was OK for everyone else to break every house rule but not me. I did of course report this quite obvious and blatant bias over the internet.

And how did your mother react?

 

[roscoe_the_first]

Truthers outnumber the official story worshippers, the Truth has found its way to every courtroom in the world. Wasn't it? 99% of all sites (that he visits, gnagna) are devoted to the Truth, something like that.

45% in a Zogby poll believe that there should another enquiry into 911. This makes us the majority as 15% don't know. That was in 2006 there's probably more now but they daren't show the numbers.

 

[progge]

Light pole 1 is adjacant to Lloyd England's taxi and his taxi was on the bridge over Columbia Pike in the center of the coverleaf. That's right in line with the damage and the Capitol Building.

What do you want to tell me? The first light pole is far away from the group of trees and poles visible in your picture.

Source of the picture

Your group of trees and poles is in the "light poles - normal, clipped" box in the picture above.

 

[roscoe_the_first]

And how did your mother react?

That's one for the alternate debate currently being conducted on another thread. You people are currently being psychologically analysed. This in fact is an experiment I'll leave shortly to look at the data we've gathered. I came here because we knew I'd get dumb mindless opposition. we will formulate a plan from the data gathered.

 

[roscoe_the_first]

What do you want to tell me? The first light pole is far away from the group of trees and poles visible in your picture.

[qimg]http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/1318/pentagonflightpath.jpg[/qimg]
Source of the picture

Your group of trees and poles is in the "light poles - normal, clipped" box in the picture above.

It was someone else who said the poles were behind the trees not me. Lloyd England's taxi was almost on the bridge. If this plane continued on its route it would fly over the Capitol Building.


Trouble is the plane did not take this route it took a northern route and would have totally missed the light poles.

 

[progge]

It was someone else who said the poles were behind the trees not me.

The flight path of AA 77 crossed none of the poles in your picture, neither SoC nor NoC.

ETA: Noticed your edit. You´re changing the subjekt. I know that the damaged light poles are incompatible with a flight path NoC. But this was not the claim I responded to. I responded to this claim:

[qimg]http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/rosebud/pictures/pl2.jpg[/qimg]

Incidently if you look at the top of this photograph you can see the Capitol Building (top slightly left of center). This is looking down the alleged path as promoted by the Official report. No poles are down. They clearly must have been taken down after the fact.

You were wrong about this, and I think you know it.