Peptoabysmal talks about California's problems as a "prime example of a full-on liberal Democratic government allowed to run to it's pitiful conclusion.
RandFan says "Governemt in America works best when there is more than a modicum of opposition to the party in power. California is a prime example of that."
While I think both of these views are right, neither one touches on what I think is the most important problem. That is the almost unparalleled incompetence of our chief executive.
Corplinx said:
Does anyone blame the California assembly for the state problems? It seems to me that Gray Davis is just a small part of any problem since he is just the governor.
The problem with what Corplinx said is that he sees something in government that will almost always be broken as a source of the problem. Legistatures, by their very nature are corrupt bodies. They make deals to generate local benefits at the expense of the population as a whole, they are controled by special interests and their size distributes accountability to the point that there is no accountability. The only thing that separates us from disaster from an unconstrained legislature is the chief executive.
In California we are seeing the kind of problems that occur when the chief executive is a weak, conniving individual driven more by politics than any desire or ability to run the government.
I'm a person that generally votes Republican, that was initally opposed to the recall effort. It was my philosophical point of view that recalls are only to be used in the case of extreme corruption or extreme incompetence. I didn't initially think that Davis was guilty of either.
I changed my mind, when I began the to realize the near totality of his failures, that include the inept handling of the power crisis, a disastrous runup in state spending and a complete failure to deal with the worker's comp crisis that threatens to put California in to a major economic crisis. If this stuff isn't an example of extreme incompetence, I don't know what is.