Bumper sticker. . .(shudder)

The Hunting of the Snark


He had forty-two boxes, all carefully packed,
With his name painted clearly on each:
But, since he omitted to mention the fact,
They were all left behind on the beach.

The loss of his clothes hardly mattered, because
He had seven coats on when he came,
With three pairs of boots---but the worst of it was,
He had wholly forgotten his name.

from http://www.theotherpages.org/poems/carrol03.html

In the midst of the word he was trying to say,
In the midst of his laughter and glee,
He had softly and suddenly vanished away---
For the Snark was a Boojum, you see.
 
Originally Posted by Huntster
I like to let law enforcement fight crime.
Isn't that just the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff mentality?

I'm not sure I understand what you mean. How did the ambulance get to the bottom of the cliff? Wouldn't it be on top with the bystanders?

Let's go with the safety-fence at the top and save evryone grief.

Safety fences are for people with brains, much like locks keep honest people out.

Nothing can save an idiot, and the greatest fool is he who tries to make things foolproof.
 
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. How did the ambulance get to the bottom of the cliff? Wouldn't it be on top with the bystanders?
Damn Alaskans who don't understand plain English!

Better we try to stop the BS before they do harm, rather than waiting for them to get the stage where we need to call the cops. What I was getting at is that if you look at fundies, they're not just the enemy of atheists, they're as much your enemy, too. If you gave every fundie a gun, how long after the last atheist had been killed do you think they'd come gunning for you because you don't agree that the Earth was built in 4004BC and are therefore a heretic?
Safety fences are for people with brains, much like locks keep honest people out.

Nothing can save an idiot, and the greatest fool is he who tries to make things foolproof.
Possibly right, maybe we should push them off the cliff instead!
 
I'm posting here regarding your posts, not Kathy's, because I have no problem with Kathy.
Of course you don't have a problem with them. You don't read them. I don't have a problem with the Japanese stock market pages.

There are extremists in all persuasions, including Christianity...

........and skepticism..........
If you bothered to read Kathy's posts, you'd see that she is one of the extremists. More than once here I've criticized my fellow skeptics for being too extreme. Of course, I read what they have to say first.

So they believe Catholics are evil?

Let them try to do something about it. Just like extremist Muslims, I'll happily kick their asses if they desperately want or need it. It doesn't matter if they believe in God or not if they're due the whuppin.
You won't know who to whup unless you pay attention to them, and that won't happen if you take this "anything you do is okay so long as you are a theist" attitude.

This is one of those beliefs of mine that you perceive as a self-contradiction, or that you keep trying to portray as a self-contradiction.
LOL. Yeah. I'm portraying your own words. Sometimes I wonder if you even pay attention to your own beliefs. You certainly don't seem to have a clear handle on them.

Skepticism is all about doubt, not belief.
Skepticism is about how you decide what to believe. I'm guessing there are some things you doubt, but that doesn't make you a skeptic.

Because the evidence sways them towards belief?
Exactly. That is how a skeptic decides what to believe. It is evidence, not faith. But what they decide on is still a belief.


Nope.

I simply don't read them.
Then you are in no position to be critical of what anyones says to Kathy. You admit you are totally ignorant of what they're talking about. This supports the contention that your defense of her is nothing but a knee-jerk reaction to defend Christians, whatever they say.

So you are in a bit of a spot here. You either:

1) Defend the rantings of a bigoted, extremist Christian,
or
2) Defend that which you have never read.

Ain't no way for you to come out lookin' good in this, Huntster. (Yeah, I know. You don't care.:rolleyes: )

I don't need to "fool" anybody if they insist on being a fool all by themselves.
My aren't you clever. A simple pun on the verb and noun forms of "fool" and you magically escape admitting that you are mis-portraying yourself as one who "doesn't care". Sorry Slick. We know that one.

I'm not on a tag team here. In fact, similar to Kathy, I sometimes get more than one response to a post.

The difference is that I'll happily slug it out with you fools rather than turn the other cheek.
Why? You don't care, remember? What is it about "slugging it out" makes you happy?

Why not? Go ahead.
You'l be just as wrong as usual. Why deviate from the expected?
That's your opinion.:p

I don't feel entangled at all. In fact, I feel just fine.
Yes, but you are trained to self-delusion.

I'm never sure of anything. I always look for entanglements. I've been caught before, so I try to remain ever vigilant. But then, I'm happier that way. It probably wouldn't be as pleasant for you. I accept that.
 
Huntster
Maybe there are conditions other than or in addition to that?:
Here is my servant whom I have chosen, the one I love, in whom I delight...
For many are invited, but few are chosen.
If the Lord had not cut short those days, no one would survive. But for the sake of the elect, whom he has chosen, he has shortened them.
only one thing is needed. Mary has chosen what is better, and it will not be taken away from her
And will not God bring about justice for his chosen ones, who cry out to him day and night?
"Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!"
If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you.
You’ve established yourself as a firm believer of predestination. Was there a point beyond that?

I'm seeking to get people to think about what is actually in the bible and why those things are and what the implications there are for those things.
Funny. That's what I'm trying to get across to you.
Yet you yourself have admitted that you don’t follow the bible and that large parts of it are not of god but of man. RandFan is, in one way, demonstrating that you still haven’t shared any reliable means to tell the difference. If a reliable one even exists.


Darth Rotor
1. The creator wants something
2. The creator is omnipotent
Nice strawman, go for it.
The creator wants, else it would not have created.
The creator is purported to be omnipotent (reference any priest)
If you’ve got a problem with either one of those, point it out. Otherwise your juvenile behavior pattern is in full effect.

Result
A. The world is not how the creator intended.
B. The creator get’s angry when things don’t go its way.
You've got a really big logical disconnect going there.
And you've got tunnel vision.
How do you justify that statement? If the world was how the creator wanted, then it wouldn’t be reported numerous times that the creator was angry, mad, jealous, etc.
Both results I posted are taken directly from the bible. Apparently, you haven’t bothered to read it.

C. The world was created with lots of challenges to apply our gifts to.

Oh, wait, that conflicts your digital, on-off, world framework strawman. Do you need a reboot?
What challenge? If the deity is omnipotent, as the majority of Christians believe, then there is no freewill and everything plays out according to a script.

I find it takes a narrow mind to dismiss someone's book that you haven't read based on less than a paragraph of discussion, a paragraph that isn't even a full book review.
You must like the taste of shoe leather, I read it years ago. I’ve also read quite a bit of other church inspired pap.


kurious_kathy
Jesus is who He said He is. And yes the prophesies have been fulfilled in Christ. It is well documented and Jesus did raise himself from the dead and showed himself to many witnesses. Let's see your Mohammad do that.
I’m not Muslim, so it’s not my Mohammad.
Isn’t it kind of odd that Jesus’ closet friends and followers didn’t even recognize him when he appeared.
The only place Jesus’ resurrection is reported is the bible, a rather nebulous and questionable source given the inaccuracies and the time span involved in the reporting.
No the prophecies have not been fulfilled. Or was there a thousands years of peace and someone forgot to report it?
If either lineage (they’re both different) reported in the bible for Jesus is correct then God directly excluded Jesus from the Davidic lineage.
Here’s a challenge, list the messianic prophecies and then put them in context. How many actually turn out to be messianic prophecies and how many are out of context bits that have been twisted.

Why is it to a Muslim they can try to bunk the Bible all they want, but when you question their Quran someone's gona get it?
Because Muslims, much like early Christians, are exceedingly dualistic in outlook. Some Christians learned to get along with others. Islam is still learning that lesson.

God is patient with everyone in hoping they'll repent. His Word tells us He doesn't want any to perish. We should not even believe that God enjoys punishing sin even though He does. The wages of sin is death. The gift of God is salvation for all who receive Jesus. We can't avoid a physical death, only a spiritual death. The promise of a redeemed body someday is enough for me.
More pap. Now how about answering the question.

“What is righteous about forcing someone to do something and then punishing them for doing it?”

I am continually trying to study more and advance in my knowledge of scripture even though it will take years to grow with and understand better. The bible is not to be read as just another peice of liturature.
Did your pastor teach you that Excuse?

I definitely believe all children have automatically been saved and are in heaven. And that includes the babies that were miscarried or aborted.
So you believe that all Christians should practice abortion. After all, that ensures the baby goes to heaven instead of being born and possibly winding up in hell.

More later.

Ossai
 
0100100001110101011011100111010001110011011101000110010101110010001000000110100101110011001000000110111001101111011101000110100001101001011011100110011100100000011000100111010101110100001000000110000100100000011011000110100101100001011100100010110000100000011000010110110001101100001000000110100001100101001000000110001101100001011011100010000001100100011011110010000001110111011010000110010101101110001000000110001101101111011011100110011001110010011011110110111001110100011001010110010000100000011101110110100101110100011010000010000001100001001000000111010001110010011101010111010001101000001000000110100101110011001000000111010001101111001000000110110001101001011001010010000001100001011000100110111101110101011101000010000001110111011010000110000101110100001000000111100101101111011101010010000001110111011100100110111101110100011001010010111000100000
 
Huntster
I'm saying that the Bible is a collection of books. There are quite a few. Some are historical accounts, some are poems, some are prophesies, etc.
And the difference between them is…
I ignore nothing in the Bible, and ignore a whole bunch of your BS.
A proven false statement. Or do you want to go back to the ‘god ordering the murder of children’ discussion?

Immoral people find justification for their immoral acts from thin air.

You're the one finding it in the Bible.
I don’t even need to reference the previous discussion, you’ve just provided a nice little example that you don’t follow the bible here.

I don't "find" morality in the Bible.
Then what use is the bible?
If you need a manual for morality, you're in poor shape.
Generally morality is taught at a young age. A manual isn’t required, but a teacher is.

RandFan
{sigh} I didn't say that you ignored parts of the bible. ??? Why do you do this? It's rude. I wasn't attacking you. I wasn't attacking god. I wasn't attacking the bible. I wasn't doing anything wrong. Why do you insist on personal attack and starting a heated debate?
It’s Huntster, once the discussion is outside his comfort zone he tends to attack in an attempt to actually avoid the topic of discussion.


The Atheist
Who cares what happened in the OT?
Quiet a few people actually. If I remember correctly, you’re not in the USA. You can’t go a week in this part of the country and not have some Quiet a few people actually. If I remember correctly, you’re not in the USA. There are numerous examples of the bible invading public life, everything from debates on gay marriage, abortion, gambling, the War in Iraq, courthouse displays of the 10Cs, politicians waving the faith flag to get votes, etc. Realize that Kurious Kathy is not a lone nut but a sampling of a large demographic.

I know that I've been guilty of it myself in the past, but is cherry-picking the obscenity and atrocity of the OT any different from a christian who answers criticism of atrocity in the OT with Stalin's atheism being the bigger atrocity?
No need to stick to the OT. The NT has it’s fair share of stupidities.

Ossai
 
Darth Rotor
How is Frankl's book "church inspired pap?"
How is it not? FYI I was using ‘church’ in a generic not a specific sense. You are the one claiming it has some deep inner meaning. However if you’re not going from a religious viewpoint then it loses it’s basic message.

Ossai
 
RandFan
It’s Huntster, once the discussion is outside his comfort zone he tends to attack in an attempt to actually avoid the topic of discussion.
Thanks, yeah I can't put up with it anymore. While I don't think he is an intentional troll he virtually is one to me. I've put him on ignore.
 
Darth Rotor
How is it not? FYI I was using ‘church’ in a generic not a specific sense. You are the one claiming it has some deep inner meaning. However if you’re not going from a religious viewpoint then it loses it’s basic message.

Ossai
OK, little c, not big C, got it.

I don't find that loses much of anything without religious context, unless you bring that baggage with you. I read it as an agnostic, and found value in it for practical philosophy, and still find it a good read now.

In Frankl's words: you are free to choose your own attitude. Your choice is noted.

DR
 
Both results I posted are taken directly from the bible. Apparently, you haven’t bothered to read it.
Thank you, tunnel vision. I have indeed read it cover to cover, as well as in support of the weekly bible study, and sometimes just to brush up. What does that have to do with the price of tea in Jerusalem?
What challenge? If the deity is omnipotent
Then said deity can set it all up in any bloody way He feels like, without restrictions based on your demand of how it "has to be." Back to a previous chat with another poster, if chaos is a deliberate design feature, that does not preclude omni much of anything.

Have you ever set up a training evolution?

DR
 
....Better we try to stop the BS before they do harm, rather than waiting for them to get the stage where we need to call the cops....

"Shoot them before they shoot us"?

What I was getting at is that if you look at fundies, they're not just the enemy of atheists, they're as much your enemy, too. If you gave every fundie a gun, how long after the last atheist had been killed do you think they'd come gunning for you because you don't agree that the Earth was built in 4004BC and are therefore a heretic?

A long, long time.

Like we say around here; "as long as they're screwing with somebody else, they're leaving me alone."

It's like the Islamic terrorists. They aren't flying airplanes into buildings in Palmer, Alaska.

If y'all are the ones pissing them off, they're your problem, not mine.

Originally Posted by Huntster
Safety fences are for people with brains, much like locks keep honest people out.

Nothing can save an idiot, and the greatest fool is he who tries to make things foolproof.

Possibly right, maybe we should push them off the cliff instead!

You got a mouse in your pocket?

Push away. Just don't look to me for backup.
 
Originally Posted by Huntster
I'm posting here regarding your posts, not Kathy's, because I have no problem with Kathy.

Of course you don't have a problem with them. You don't read them. I don't have a problem with the Japanese stock market pages.

Fair enough.

Originally Posted by Huntster
There are extremists in all persuasions, including Christianity...

........and skepticism..........

If you bothered to read Kathy's posts, you'd see that she is one of the extremists. More than once here I've criticized my fellow skeptics for being too extreme. Of course, I read what they have to say first.

I haven't read her posts, so I have not criticized her for being too extreme.

I figure she has enough folks doing that.

Keep on those extreme skeptics, though. Not enough folks around here keeping them in line...........

Originally Posted by Huntster
So they believe Catholics are evil?

Let them try to do something about it. Just like extremist Muslims, I'll happily kick their asses if they desperately want or need it. It doesn't matter if they believe in God or not if they're due the whuppin.

You won't know who to whup unless you pay attention to them, and that won't happen if you take this "anything you do is okay so long as you are a theist" attitude.

It's not so much "anything you do is okay so long as you are a theist attitude" as much "anything you do is okay so long as you don't screw with me "attitude.

Kathy doesn't address challenges or retorts to me on this forum. I've got enough to address with the Huntster-haters here.

You address who you wish. I'll do likewise, thanks...........

Originally Posted by Huntster
This is one of those beliefs of mine that you perceive as a self-contradiction, or that you keep trying to portray as a self-contradiction.

LOL. Yeah. I'm portraying your own words. Sometimes I wonder if you even pay attention to your own beliefs. You certainly don't seem to have a clear handle on them.

I'm feeling fine here.

Originally Posted by Huntster
Skepticism is all about doubt, not belief.

Skepticism is about how you decide what to believe.

No, it's not:

Skepticism:
–noun
1. skeptical attitude or temper; doubt.
2. doubt or unbelief with regard to a religion, esp. Christianity.
3. (initial capital letter) the doctrines or opinions of philosophical Skeptics; universal doubt.

I'm guessing there are some things you doubt, but that doesn't make you a skeptic.

Yes, there are plenty of things I doubt, and yes, that makes me a skeptic regarding those doubts.

So you are in a bit of a spot here. You either:

1) Defend the rantings of a bigoted, extremist Christian,
or
2) Defend that which you have never read.

I've done neither. I've defended nothing. I've criticized your silly attacks on her.

Ain't no way for you to come out lookin' good in this, Huntster. (Yeah, I know. You don't care. )

A guy who looks like me doesn't much worry about "lookin' good."

Originally Posted by Huntster
I don't need to "fool" anybody if they insist on being a fool all by themselves.

My aren't you clever.

Sometimes.

A simple pun on the verb and noun forms of "fool" and you magically escape admitting that you are mis-portraying yourself as one who "doesn't care".

Magic?

I don't believe in magic. Call me a skeptic.

Originally Posted by Huntster
I'm not on a tag team here. In fact, similar to Kathy, I sometimes get more than one response to a post.

The difference is that I'll happily slug it out with you fools rather than turn the other cheek.

Why? You don't care, remember? What is it about "slugging it out" makes you happy?

I like arguing with fools. It makes me feel competent.

However, like a wise man once told me, don't waste time wrassling with pigs in the sty. You'll both get muddy and s****y, but the hogs will like it!

I guess I'm the pig. I'm having fun!

Originally Posted by Huntster
Why not? Go ahead.
You'l be just as wrong as usual. Why deviate from the expected?

That's your opinion.

Yup. Sure is.
 
Last edited:
Darth Rotor
Thank you, tunnel vision. I have indeed read it cover to cover, as well as in support of the weekly bible study, and sometimes just to brush up. What does that have to do with the price of tea in Jerusalem?
You’ve still got the logic disconnect to deal with. The premise and results are directly pulled from the bible or what is commonly believed by the majority of Christians. The results don’t logically follow the premise.

Back to a previous chat with another poster, if chaos is a deliberate design feature, that does not preclude omni much of anything.
If god is omnipotent, then what chaos exists? There may be the illusion of chaos, but true chaos, as in god didn’t know it was going to happen, can’t exist. Unless you want to change the basic definition of omnipotence.

Ossai
 
Back to a previous chat with another poster, if chaos is a deliberate design feature, that does not preclude omni much of anything.
I think I'm the other poster, but even if not, I'll pop back in.

If chaos is deliberate, it does not preclude omnipotence or omniscience, but it certainly precludes omnibenevolence.

An omnipotent god can set up the system in any way he chooses. But if he has an option of a perfect universe in which everyone is perfectly happy and perfectly loving (and even perfectly worshipful, if he likes) yet chooses instead to create something less, then there is no basis for the claim of an all loving god.
 
Originally Posted by Ossai
RandFan
It’s Huntster, once the discussion is outside his comfort zone he tends to attack in an attempt to actually avoid the topic of discussion.

Thanks, yeah I can't put up with it anymore. While I don't think he is an intentional troll he virtually is one to me. I've put him on ignore.

Really?
 
Quote:
I'm saying that the Bible is a collection of books. There are quite a few. Some are historical accounts, some are poems, some are prophesies, etc.

And the difference between them is…

Begin your journey here.

Quote:
I ignore nothing in the Bible, and ignore a whole bunch of your BS.

A proven false statement. Or do you want to go back to the ‘god ordering the murder of children’ discussion?

Since you are the remedial kind of guy, I suspect you will want to return to that lesson forever.

No use. You'll never figure it out because you don't want to figure it out.

Quote:
Immoral people find justification for their immoral acts from thin air.

You're the one finding it in the Bible.

Which immoral act of mine do you refer to?

I don’t even need to reference the previous discussion, you’ve just provided a nice little example that you don’t follow the bible here.

"Follow the bible?"

My Bible is static. It's still laying where I left it.

Does yours travel on it's own?

Quote:
I don't "find" morality in the Bible.

Then what use is the bible?

Since I don't "find" morality in the factory repair manual for my Audi, what good is that?

None.....until I need to fix the car...........

Quote:
If you need a manual for morality, you're in poor shape.

Generally morality is taught at a young age. A manual isn’t required, but a teacher is.

If a manual isn't required, why are you and RandFan so insistent that the Bible must be a manual?

Why are you so put out when I agree that it is not a manual on morality?

Why do you repeatedly drag this tired game back up?
 
If I may, Huntster, if the bible is not a manual then what is it?

Further, what is its role in your belief?
 
If I may, Huntster, if the bible is not a manual then what is it?

Let me try this approach:

Manual:

noun
5. a small book, esp. one giving information or instructions: a manual of mathematical tables.
6. a nonelectric or nonelectronic typewriter; a typewriter whose keys and carriage may be powered solely by the typist's hands.
7. Military. the prescribed drill in handling a rifle: the manual of arms.
8. Music. a keyboard, esp. one of several belonging to a pipe organ.
9. Automotive. manual transmission.

The Bible is not a "manual."

It is a collection of books of many types, written by many different individuals, over many different eras, under many different circumstances. For pete's sake, some of these books are obvious prayers or songs.

Would you call the lyrics of John Lennon a "manual of morality"?

(Knowing some here might do just that, ask them why they need a manual of morality written by a rock and roll musician).

Further, what is its role in your belief?

It is the tribal and religious history of the Israelite/Hebrew/Jewish people, and their struggle to understand their foundation with regard to the God of Abraham.

It is a collection of books written by wise men like Solomon, "Qoheleth", Sirach, and others.

It is a collection of some absolutely beautiful poems and songs.

And it is a collection of testimonials regarding Jesus of Nazareth, whom the writers and others have determined was the Messiah prophesized in the Old Testament.

It is also a history of the struggles of the first Christians, and some of the letters written between them.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom