• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bullycide

Dear Scum,

We permanently disagree. If I live under the gun of an oppressor, and I initiate an attack against him, even if he isn't immediately pointing the gun at me, that's self-defense. Your sophistry can go hang.

Yours,

Cpl Ferro

Striving for clarity in an argument, and asking others to illustrate why they believe what they believe... is now sophistry.

You have illustrated, however, that you have no interest in a rational discussion. Thanks for pointing that out.
 
I would like to challenge this statement. When I was bullied I was so isolated I really thought something was wrong with me. Years later I saw movies such as "Never Been Kissed" and others and it struck me as odd. In those movies the odd balls became the champion. At the end of the movie they pointed out the successful potential of those students. Temple Grandin has pointed out, for example, that without Aspergers we'd not have the likes of Bill Gates, Einstein and others.

The tools I am thinking about would need to be specific. I think a "nerd" group of kids can gain a sense of dominance or control by understanding that they are more intelligent than their peers, and this is what makes them the "odd bird."

Likewise homosexuals often have support in understanding that their community is narrow minded and religious. Society has tried to match that understanding in the media. For example the show "United States of Tara"

There are many resources for kids who understand why they are being targeted. It doesn't make it go away to understand it, but in feeling a sense of bigger picture it helps create a solidarity outside the paradigm of school life.

To me, this is the most prudent approach because it catches the attention of the student who is actively involved in being victimized by bullies. Others are not going to care. Seriously they are not. Think back to your life in highschool. Who did you even notice?

So get all the targeted children together, make them watch Revenge of the Nerds and then send them on their way. Or maybe they can watch Breakfast Club and decide to start their own gang of outcasts!

I do not see the value in this. Those who are being bullied understand that they don't fit in. They are reminded of this on a daily, often hourly, basis. In order for it to be considered even part of the solution, there would need to be an ongoing group of shared interests not related to being bullied. There may be enough LGBT students to form a society, which would give that specific group so protection. But what about students like WTBS's friend? What about students who can not participate in extracurricular activities?

This does not in any way address the actions of those who are bullying them.
 
First of all TT, I still don't like what you're saying at all. It smacks heavily ofblaming the victim and belittling the experiences of many bullied people just because you were able to deal with it. I don't know if you mean to, and I assume you don't, but you come across as unpleasantly smug and self satisfied, sneering at those who were too weak to deal with bullying in the same way you did. You need to work on how you make your points, because well, when pretty much everyone misunderstands what you're trying to say, it's probably your poor communication. That being said, I apologise for misinterpreting what you meant and I apologise for the insults, they were over the top even if I WAS right about what you meant.

Now, on to the meat of your post.


I think it's cute that the people raging about victims of bullying are the ones using insults and name calling to try to get their point across. :D

Emotional reactions. Having been force fed the "Sticks and Stones" crap from a very early age, many people who are less adept at dealing with bullying tend to lash out at people who are seen to be belittling them, and seriously, that's exactly how you come across.

Anyway perhaps I'm looking at this at too narrow of a lens.

Yes. That of your own personal experience, which you seem to be completely unable to get past. I understand that you asked me for more information, and I'd be glad to give it if you genuinely want to understand, but it really really doesn't seem like an honest request. If I'm being brutal, you're coming across like a blunt bully yourself.

I am addressing ONLY the OP topic of suicide because of the result of bullying. In other words the kid couldn't take it and killed themselves.

That is
a. Insulting as hell and
b. oversimplification



I'm not talking about physical attacks because there are repercussions for physical assault. That's a no brainer and easier to solve. You touch another student in school and instant pronto suspension. That is easy to solve. Maybe the schools don't do it but as a solution we've seen zero tolerance policies creeping up around the country.
All reasonable.


However you can bully a person without laying a hand on them. This is where it gets harder to correct. And frankly it does seem to me to be much more damaging psychologically to the victim than physical assault.
Really? What led you to that conclusion? :rolleyes:

The one and only time I was physically hurt by people on purpose, it was far less of an issue than the emotional and mental abuse.

To me, (perhaps I'm wrong) this is what drives students to commit suicide.

If I understand you correctly, I'd say that it's usually the case, yes.

I am wondering if it is possible to create awareness campaigns that DO teach the student not to internalize it and take it personally. In doing so it would help avoid suicide. That is my goal with this approach.

There's a major problem with this though, which you seem to be completely oblivious to and why you come across as being an ignorant fool who belittles people.

It won't always work. In fact, I'd guess that the majority of bullied children who take it to heart to the point of becoming depressed and contemplating or even attempting suicide won't be helped with a good talking to.

Counselling will help in some cases, especially if provided by a trained expert, but speaking as someone who represents my point, while it made me feel a little better to talk to someone, it doesn't stop you taking the crap personally. It basically serves as a vent and a soother. Having someone to discuss it with and having someone who will try to cheer you and build your confidence will take the edge of your feelings at the time, but it isn't something that will stop the words getting to you. No matter how much people tell me how intelligent I am and how none of it was because I was defective and I shouldn't take it to heart I did anyway.

My mind internalised these rantings, some of which in my more lucid moments I could tell were nonsense, and that made it even easier for them to convince me I was just as worthless and pathetic as they made me out to be. Counselling helps deal with the current mood of the victim, but it won't stop the bullies hurting them. That's why your idea doesn't work.

It's why I liked the "It get's better" campaign.

Another problem is of course that for some people, it never gets better. Bullying isn't just something that happens at school you know.

It helped students to realize that there is a bigger picture, future and hope. It identifies them as one of the larger group of victims of being bullied rather than the sole "odd ball" in their class. It gives them hope.

Some of them. Some of them won't be reached no matter how upbeat you are.

If you'd stop being outraged long enough to consider what I'm saying, I think you'd see what I mean.
As a counterpoint, if you would stop assuming that your situation is the only one or even the norm, you might understand why your idea is really stupid.

Many kids and probably most of them who will contemplate suicide due to bullying are already damaged or mentally fragile. Telling them that it gets better and to buck up will not help matters. You may even make it worse.

In fact, I know that for some you will make it worse. If you had tried those platitudes with me, and some people did similar things, telling me that the bullying didn't really matter and that it was the fault of the bullies, you would have effectively driven me into a far more fragile and deluded state. Oh, and what a surprise, it did. Insisting that hey, you can think your way out of this and you don't NEED to personalise this stuff made me even MORE convinced I was actually a weak and pathetic creature barely worthy of the bullies contempt.

Did you think about this sort of thing at all TT? Be honest with me, did you just assume everyone is essentially like you and that they can just work through it because we can tell them it gets better?

We cannot stop bullying. It will always happen. We can stream it down as much as possible but if a teen is feeling ostracized and oppressed, giving them hope might save their life.

Except as I have mentioned above, your attempts to give them hope might do absolutely sod all, and may even make them MORE depressed. Stop assuming you are the norm.


I never took it personally. Ever.
Bully for you.

I realized it was their problem not mine. I was bullied relentlessly every single day in junior high school. Beaten up on the way home, mocked and made fun of in the hallways. When I got to high school we merged with a different area of students so I had the chance to make new friends. But it never occurred to me to commit suicide because all of the girls in my gym class made fun of me day after day after day. I just thought they were beyotches. I didn't think it was my problem. I just knew I was different. It can be done, big giant message board letters aside. :)
Aaaaand this pretty much confirms what I've been thinking. You genuinely think that pretty much everyone works in the same way as you. You have no intention of learning about why your "solution" is a massive waste of time because you have absolutely no interest in learning about the feelings and experiences of the mentally unstable. You just assume that everyone can be given a nice chat and when they're told that it isn't their fault and not to take it personally, everyone will deal with it just like you did and bullying will be much lessened as a problem.

No. You are seemingly unable to process the fact that some people aren't like you. You don't seem to care that your approach may further damage some children, because you are firmly convinced that if everyone can just be told to stop taking it so seriously and internalising the bullies words then they will come out of it as perfectly well rounded individuals. I WAS told that I should ignore it over and over again and it never once helped, so I'm going to give you some advice.

Sit in a chair, shut up, and read what people who disagree with you are saying. You are not a guru with some inate knowledge on how to fix bullied kids so they don't kill themselves, you're an ignorant jackass with her own personal success story and such limited imagination she doesn't understand why it could possibly fail as a method to combat bullying.
 
Dear Sabrina,

You and I agree that any physical attack merits physical defense, up to and including whatever pain and tissue damage is necessary. I do not advocate revenge, but, as I wrote above, preemptive strikes are fair game, if that's what it takes to get a given bellicose individual to STAY THE HELL AWAY. I will not be moved on that regard.

Yours,

Cpl Ferro

And it is statements like that which would land any child of yours that is taught a "pre-emptive strike is okay" very quickly in jail for assault.
 
Sorry but I disagree - teaching a child that violence is the right answer is wrong. (That does not of course equate to saying that someone should not defend themselves from violence.)

Equivocation Fallacy? One person's self-defense is another's use of violence.
 
I agree with Darat; violence in response to violence is never the right answer. ...


I used to think like that when I was young. Someone tried to rob and kill me when I was about 20. I stopped him from killing me by threatening him with lethal, reciprocal violence.

So it came down to him or me. I voted me. He went to jail. I went home alive.
 
I used to think like that when I was young. Someone tried to rob and kill me when I was about 20. I stopped him from killing me by threatening him with lethal, reciprocal violence.

So it came down to him or me. I voted me. He went to jail. I went home alive.

So a mugging is the same as bullying?

What are you smoking, because I'd like to buy an ounce of it.
 
You know, it takes a special kind of person to muddy the difference between aggression and self defense, and then, without the slightest hesitation, go on to point out why bullying is wrong.
 
So a mugging is the same as bullying?

What are you smoking, because I'd like to buy an ounce of it.

It's interesting. I'm not responding to the other post but it is so long. But one of the other things I'd mentioned is that some people are anti social and this can also lead to them being bullied.

So far your comments have simplfied what I have suggested to a ridiculous degree, suggested I consider myself a guru, name called and insulted and also told me to shut up and that I was stupid, evil twisted etc. Now you are using that sarcasm on someone else.


Gee I wonder why people don't like you?:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
So get all the targeted children together, make them watch Revenge of the Nerds and then send them on their way. Or maybe they can watch Breakfast Club and decide to start their own gang of outcasts!

I do not see the value in this. Those who are being bullied understand that they don't fit in. They are reminded of this on a daily, often hourly, basis. In order for it to be considered even part of the solution, there would need to be an ongoing group of shared interests not related to being bullied. There may be enough LGBT students to form a society, which would give that specific group so protection. But what about students like WTBS's friend? What about students who can not participate in extracurricular activities?

This does not in any way address the actions of those who are bullying them.

Obviously you are not going to see the value of this since you don't understand what I am saying.

I'm not saying pat the kid on the back and saying "Hey dems da breaks, get over it." Rather a system that teaches kids about bullying from even younger ages in school. Explain the dynamics of bullying. Show clips of what bullying does etc. Educate all children on bullying and don't shy away from explaining group think and why people have been bullied.

I'm sorry that you think educating the kids would be akin to watching "Revenge of the Nerds" and sending them on their way. That's really over simplifying what I am saying.

I've noticed several of you have done that on here and it's because the only way you can put down the idea is to make it into an ineffective gesture.
 
This is an interesting dynamic. Because the way it comes across to me, EVEN THOUGH I KNOW YOU ARE NOT SAYING THIS, is that your mother was too helpless, ignorant, blind etc. to realize that she was marrying an abuser.

People are not completely different before they got married. It is an impossibility except in the rare cases of split personality or sociopath. Most women clearly have clues to see what's going to go down.

I have personally watched girlfriends of mine sing the praises of some misogynistic jerk. Starry eyed love and whatnot. Meanwhile my mind is doing the reality check

Ex.

Still lives with the parents
Hasn't had a steady job in years
Makes sexist comments ALL the time
Puts down things the woman is excited about
Rolls his eyes during conversation
Orders dinner for her
Very jealous
Is disrespectful about family members
Is rude to waiters and other service people
loses his temper easily
etc etc etc

I can't tell you the number of times I've watched a woman sashay into an abusive relationship only to claim to be "blindsided" later. Meanwhile the whole time I was telling her it was going to happen. After a while I begin to hold my tongue because they are not going to listen.

So were you fully aware that you were marrying and having children with an abuser?

I'm sorry that your mother went through this. I'm sorry so many women go through this. And yes of course they are victims. But I suppose I wonder why that pattern is so startling high. I just don't get it. AT ALL.

And again, why the appeal to emotion? What anecdotes have I used to justify your self help group sympathy rant? I've shared my experiences as evidence to explain my own personal perspective. You are throwing yours down as some sort of evidence. The evidence for me is that its the same pattern over and over again.

I don't get it; you supply an anecdote to support where you are coming from. I supply an anectdote to support why it's not always that simple but what you are doing is okay and what I am doing is appealing.

My question is why is it that people seem to freeze intellectually once emotions are involved???????????????????????????????? (Hope that's enough question marks for people to realize it is a question)

No, it's not the question, it's the condescention behind the question. It's judgemental and assuming that you, because you claim to be so logical, must be correct. That's not a question that deserves an answer in my opinion.

Also, saying I'm blaming the victim because I ask a legitimate question, is in my mind the kind of thinking that perpetuates victimhood.

But you are not just asking legitimate questions, you are following them up with condescending statements on why everyone who doesn't agree with you is so obviously irrational.

Why does it bother you so much to look at the reality of the situation? It seems like that the most important thing to you is to "protect the victim"

As weird as it sounds, yes, protecting people who are not always in a position to protect themselves is important.

My goal is to "Prevent the victim."

Cool slogan. I would even suggest preventing the victim would start with, I don't know, not tolerating bullying. Strange concept, I know.
 
It's interesting. I'm not responding to the other post but it is so long. But one of the other things I'd mentioned is that some people are anti social and this can also lead to them being bullied.

So far your comments have simplfied what I have suggested to a ridiculous degree, suggested I consider myself a guru, name called and insulted and also told me to shut up and that I was stupid, evil twisted etc. Now you are using that sarcasm on someone else.


Gee I wonder why people don't like you?:rolleyes:

So, you aren't responding to the post where I take you apart, and instead focus on a small throwaway post directed at someone else, then you accuse me of oversimplfying what you think without actually attempting to explain yourself despite the fact that there are multiple people having trouble with your atrocious communication skills, then you accuse me of being anti-social without any evidence (quite the opposite in fact, while I can be shy in some situations I've found I make friends easily) and then make a pronouncement that the bullying I suffered is probably because I'm horrible?

Wow. That's impressive. You not only continue to ignore the people who can take apart your happy little fantasy scenario about fixing the damage of bullying, but you then mock them, tell them that the bullying was their fault, and refuse to address the points they make while accusing them of not listening to you?

I'm stunned by the sheer level of intellectual dishonesty on display from you. Not only that but it's a display of cowardice, double standards and an overwhelming sense of smugness. You aren't here to actually discuss your ideas at all, because if you were, you could ignore the jibes made against you (hey, just like your theory tells bullied mentally ill kids to! Fancy that) and actually address the arguments I made.

Instead you choose to focus solely on the barbs made as a result of the emotional response triggered by your staggering inability to actually acknowledge that your idea, well intentioned as it is (and it is, and I fully understand why you think it would work, going on your experiences. Hell, I actually admire you for being able to so easily shrug off what sounds like a vicious campaign of bullying against you) is flawed when dealing with the very kids you want to help.


Want me to write a paragraph discussing your ideas without me insulting you or making any negative statements about you? Here you go:


[Nice Mode]

Your idea is an interesting but flawed one. Your premise, understandable as it is, would not work for many mentally fragile people, such as myself, because an indication that the anguish they are going through at the hands of vicious predators can be lightly shrugged off or even worked through if only they had a positive attitude would instead of helping actually come across as belittling their feelings. While it could well work for more stable individuals, and indeed should be used on them, in my opinion, your idea won't help many who contemplate suicide. It may in fact cause them to begin thinking that not only are the bullies accurate or at least cutting, that they are also pathetic for not being able to move past the bullying and dismiss it as the person giving the advice is telling them they can do.

Further, I feel that you haven't quite grasped that many of these children, if not caught early enough, will have had their can do attitude ground into the dirt. Some of them may be experiencing massive paranoia, afraid they cannot trust anyone at all. If this is the case, then your plan may doubly backfire, as the child may take the offer of help and advice as being a set-up. It may cause them to retreat further within themselves, particularly if they do try any techniques you use or any advice you give and it fails.

[/Nice Mode]

How about that? Will you please address my points now?
 
So were you fully aware that you were marrying and having children with an abuser?

No, but looking back the clues were all there. I got married when I was 20. He wasn't a very violent person but his personality was high strung and he was a control freak. I remember for example him buying me clothes and me not wanting to wear them and he freaked out. I didn't catch it.

I don't get it; you supply an anecdote to support where you are coming from. I supply an anectdote to support why it's not always that simple but what you are doing is okay and what I am doing is appealing.

Because I am not throwing my anecdote at you to berate you for not agreeing with me as you did with your comment.


No, it's not the question, it's the condescention behind the question. It's judgemental and assuming that you, because you claim to be so logical, must be correct. That's not a question that deserves an answer in my opinion.


Yes it is a question. Your post again is higly emotional and angry and there's a perceived "condescenton" that is not intended. Most of your responses to me have been highly emotional. When I don't respond in kind you accuse me of being condescending. This is not true. I'm sorry it comes across that way. It simply isn't how I feel. It is a question, you deciding because it's nto emotional it doesn't deserve an answer is strange to me.


But you are not just asking legitimate questions, you are following them up with condescending statements on why everyone who doesn't agree with you is so obviously irrational.


Where have I said that? What I am asking is, IS IT POSSIBLE? I'm curious because as you have noted I am not as emotional in my responses as some people. For me I can sort of look at a situation very objectively, disassociatively etc and make a good judgement. But I learned over the years to do this. For a long time I would respond emotionally. What I'm wondering is if people think it is impossible for people to learn to separate their emotional reaction from the reality. So as not to internalize it and not create drama. (I'm not being condescending when I say create drama so I hope you don't take it that way.


As weird as it sounds, yes, protecting people who are not always in a position to protect themselves is important.

Of course it is, but if you only expend energy there, then all you are going to do is keep doing the same thing over and over again. My goal would be preventative as well as reactive.

Cool slogan. I would even suggest preventing the victim would start with, I don't know, not tolerating bullying. Strange concept, I know.


Of course. However how do you propose to do that? We're discussing ways to help with the issue of suicide resulting from bullying. So if that's the case the bullying has already occurred. We've already discussed zero tolerance for physical bullying.

I'm asking about strategies to deal with psychological bullying. Saying that we're going to prevent bullying WORDS in the world is very very unrealistic in my mind. How in the world can you enforce this?

I'm more for educating students, using prevention and zero tolerance where possible can examining why some students take it to heart so so much and if they can be taught ways to cope with it better.

I'm sorry this seems condenscending and stupid to you. To me it seems quite realistic.:cool:
 
[Nice Mode]

Your idea is an interesting but flawed one. Your premise, understandable as it is, would not work for many mentally fragile people, such as myself, because an indication that the anguish they are going through at the hands of vicious predators can be lightly shrugged off or even worked through if only they had a positive attitude would instead of helping actually come across as belittling their feelings. While it could well work for more stable individuals, and indeed should be used on them, in my opinion, your idea won't help many who contemplate suicide. It may in fact cause them to begin thinking that not only are the bullies accurate or at least cutting, that they are also pathetic for not being able to move past the bullying and dismiss it as the person giving the advice is telling them they can do.

Further, I feel that you haven't quite grasped that many of these children, if not caught early enough, will have had their can do attitude ground into the dirt. Some of them may be experiencing massive paranoia, afraid they cannot trust anyone at all. If this is the case, then your plan may doubly backfire, as the child may take the offer of help and advice as being a set-up. It may cause them to retreat further within themselves, particularly if they do try any techniques you use or any advice you give and it fails.

[/Nice Mode]

How about that? Will you please address my points now?


Well obviously my plan is not going to address every single aspect of bullying. None of the solutions on here have addressed every single aspect of bullying. Each situation is highly unsual. A skinny geek getting picked on by the football team experiences something very different than the homosexual in a bible thumper town. Etc.

As I noted earlier there would be different sorts of approaches mentioned.

I do agree with your point though that people who are at risk for suicide would probably not respond well to this type of approach because they are already suffering from psychological issues. In that case I would suggest you go back to the parents. Massive intervention is needed at this point. In addition the schools should be on high alert for this student and any bullying. One way we could perhaps deal with that is have a student petition for emotional distress.

A parent, friend or the student themselves could document three cases of bullying, and submit this to the school board. If the school doesn't immediatley shut down the bullying, the school can be held liable for any consequences that arise because of it. Example, counseling and liability lawsuits if the student is physically assaulted again. Money tends to be a fire under their butt type of issue.
 

Back
Top Bottom