Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2005
- Messages
- 96,955
This is relevant why?Do you think it would be acceptable for Hillary to refer to Obama as the "HNIC" ?
This is relevant why?Do you think it would be acceptable for Hillary to refer to Obama as the "HNIC" ?
This is relevant why?
No it would not.Because it would demonstrate that you have different rules for one particular candidate, and accept and excuse actions only for that one person. ...
This is relevant why?
No,it is not.Because it is a joke in the same vein as "you know those people are always late"...
Because it is a joke in the same vein as "you know those people are always late"
Had this been not immediately after the other incidents, had they not had the only black guy there in costume (seriously, why was Odom in costume? So they wouldn't confuse him for Samuel L Jackson?) this might have gone over better.
But this is just further proof of how astoundingly tone deaf and unprepared Hillary, her campaign and her supporters are. People aren't outraged, mainly because this stuff has been going on for too long to shock anyone, especially the folks whose expense this is done at.
Are there ever real consequences?
And you are assuming the mainstream media is all that interested in long term fallout rather than moving on to tomorrow's popular soundbite.
But when November rolls around and Hillary doesn't get as many black voters as she expects, maybe we can revisit this conversation.
Ask Howard Dean, or Michael Dukakis...
No, just soundbites. This wasn't about the msm.
Sure.
Tell me how many she is expecting now, if it's realistic, and how we tell if her "tonedeafness" is actually related to that final number.
About what? Running out of money and getting trounced? Or are we still under the "yell" and "tank picture" myths?
No, its about Hillary not caring.
You think it helps?
Do you think it would be acceptable for Hillary to refer to Obama as the "HNIC" ?
NPR identified them as BLM protesters, and they talked with at least one of the protesters afterward:
http://www.npr.org/2016/04/07/47342...ed-exchange-with-black-lives-matter-protester
Clinton was making the point that there were African American groups at the time who favored the bill. It was not simply a matter of the white politicians doing this unilaterally. IT turns out that a majority of the congressional black caucus voted for it too:
http://reason.com/blog/2015/04/30/former-cbc-chair-who-voted-for-1994-crim
Do you think that's the sort of thing she would say?
In that moment he revealed himself and his true thoughts on black people. He likely had lots to do with his wife calling us “super predators” and that “we need to be brought to heel” like we were animals.
We confronted Bill Clinton about race: “In that moment he revealed himself and his true thoughts on black people”
Revealed is not a word I would have chosen given that his wife bragged about getting support from "hard-working Americans, white Americans" in 2008
You mean an ethnic joke?
Remind me why i should give a **** what a random BLM activist thinks ?
"Random"?
They were the ones that were actually there, as detailed in the article.
Although I am not surprised you don't give a **** about what they say, Hillary and Bill don't either.