Browne useless again: Tori Stafford

Questioninggeller said:
Browne's office took the time to return the phone call and Browne has time to give readings on her current tour. While Browne can't answer millions of calls note her business manager Linda Rossi says 50% of her business has dried up, surely Browne can do a 20 minute reading when life or death is involved.
Click to expand...

Why should she? As I said, painful as this is/was to the family, it is a dime a dozen for her.
 
Three reasons: her own promises, morality and money.

1) Browne's own words are that she will "help" police and families involving crimes for free. She has been involved with families several times, not even including the Montel Williams Show. This was a high profile case about a missing child.

2) If her office can take the time to return a call then they can add an extra 30 seconds to the call, saying "Tori is being held at XYZ" then hang up. If you really are psychic and can do that then you have a moral obligation to help.

3) Here's another reason, even if Browne has no morals for helping anyone but herself. There was a $50,000 reward to find Tori. Why didn't Browne find her and take the reward money (then buy a new car or to donate it to a needy organization)? She charges $850 per call and this one could have earned her $50,000.

The likely reason Browne didn't get involved was she doesn't need anymore bad PR with her giving wrong information to parents of a missing child. Simply put, she's not psychic.


As for your claim that such a call is a dime a dozen, I don't believe that. Do you have evidence or is that just your conjecture?
 
Last edited:
Wow! Sylvia failed to come through again! Shocking!

Everytime I feel myself slipping into Sylvia and her likes evil web a new Sylvias wrong again thread pops up.

Thanks!
 
Questioninggeller said:
Three reasons: her own promises, morality and money.

1) Browne's own words are that she will "help" police and families involving crimes for free. She has been involved with families several times, not even including the Montel Williams Show. This was a high profile case about a missing child.

2) If her office can take the time to return a call then they can add an extra 30 seconds to the call, saying "Tori is being held at XYZ" then hang up. If you really are psychic and can do that then you have a moral obligation to help.

3) Here's another reason, even if Browne has no morals for helping anyone but herself. There was a $50,000 reward to find Tori. Why didn't Browne find her and take the reward money (then buy a new car or to donate it to a needy organization)? She charges $850 per call and this one could have earned her $50,000.

The likely reason Browne didn't get involved was she doesn't need anymore bad PR with her giving wrong information to parents of a missing child. Simply put, she's not psychic.


As for your claim that such a call is a dime a dozen, I don't believe that. Do you have evidence or is that just your conjecture?
Click to expand...

Again, common sense. Kids go missing all the time.
 
psychicwonderer628 said:
Again, common sense. Kids go missing all the time.
Click to expand...

You are saying that Browne's office receives then returns phone calls about missing girls with a rewards of $50,000 dozens of times a day? Do you have evidence of this?

Do you have evidence that anyone besides Stafford called Browne's office about a missing person since the Hornbeck failure? Give just one name about a missing persons case since Hornbeck (other than the one we are discussing).

Making a claim of "common sense" is not the same as supporting it with evidence. Time on the JREF boards will show that "common" and "sense" are in the eye of the beholder. So just give evidence.

After all, I can say it's "common sense" that few people believe Browne anymore and therefore only a few people call her office now.

You haven't actually responded to reasons in my post. Browne had three reasons to give a reading:
1) She promises to help families of missing children.
2) Her office returned Stafford's call and could have taken 30 seconds to tell where the girl was while on the line.
3) Browne could have made $50,000 for herself or a charity by saying where the girl was.

4) Here's another reason: Solving a high profile case, like the Stafford adbuction, would help counter criticism that Browne's a fraud (such as, Hornbeck and many others she got wrong). Why doesn't she offer ONE case that she has solved?
 
Last edited:
Questioninggeller said:
the Hornbeck failure
Click to expand...

I quoted this as psychicwonderer628 may not even be aware of the story.
Please read the story mentioned and understand not only how horrible was Sylvia to do it to those parents, but also to understand the fact that our own RSL exposed the story big time in the media.

Isn't it more likely to assume that Sylvia is keeping her nose out of missing children out of fear of being exposed again?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom