British Intelligence: Mossad carried out 9/11

Yes, Sennemut! You've figured it out.

The Mossad controlled pro-Zionist lobby in Washington had the story pulled from the Fox web after it aired in its entirety. .... To keep it secret, obviously - except for all the people who watched the multi-part story and all those who saw it referred to and watched it while it was still on their site.

And although they had the clout to stop Fox from posting it, they can't stop Timmy Truther from exposing the evil Zionist plots? C'mon, guys! We're talking about the Mossad, possibly the most evil internet villain this side of Larry Silverstein and Dick Cheney. They murdered some schlub in Hamburg and took down the Twin Towers, but they can't bag some pimply faced kid posting old news videos from his mom's basement?

Well Sennemut is speculating; fair enough. His speculation is logical....

You, on the other hand, cannot understand the difference between a major media outlet such as Fox, and a JREF internet forum. Which one has the power to shape public opinion?
 
Well Sennemut is speculating; fair enough. His speculation is logical....

You, on the other hand, cannot understand the difference between a major media outlet such as Fox, and a JREF internet forum. Which one has the power to shape public opinion?

And you appear not to know the difference between Fox News (who produced the original goal posts in question) and freaking google, yahoo, Bing and every other search engine in the world where a 26 second long search pulled up multiple copies of it.

ZOMG! Teh informashun is available only on teh Goggles, and not on FOX! IT IS A CONSPIRACY!one one!!!!

/his speculation is grossly idiotic.
 
Well Sennemut is speculating; fair enough. His speculation is logical....

You, on the other hand, cannot understand the difference between a major media outlet such as Fox, and a JREF internet forum. Which one has the power to shape public opinion?


What's the JREF got to do with this?
 
And you appear not to know the difference between Fox News (who produced the original goal posts in question) and freaking google, yahoo, Bing and every other search engine in the world where a 26 second long search pulled up multiple copies of it.

ZOMG! Teh informashun is available only on teh Goggles, and not on FOX! IT IS A CONSPIRACY!one one!!!!

/his speculation is grossly idiotic.

I guess you also do not understand the difference?

I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume that you cannot find this story on a FOX website....

Anyway, its his speculation, not mine; but who are you to call it "grossly idiotic"? How is it grossly idiotic?
 
I guess you also do not understand the difference?

I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume that you cannot find this story on a FOX website....

Anyway, its his speculation, not mine; but who are you to call it "grossly idiotic"? How is it grossly idiotic?

Your question assumes two things: 1. everything else that Fox has ever done is still on their website, which is absolutely false; 2. the story is not available anywhere else, when in fact that is not only false, but in fact is easily available, hell I found it in 26 seconds.

But the real point? This has absolutely nothing to do with the nonsense in the first first post. Hell it has nothing to do with anything ever, except for giving some anti-semitic mouth breathers another thing to blame On TEh Jooos!

Now, i was saying: Cossiga? lulz!
 
You, on the other hand, cannot understand the difference between a major media outlet such as Fox, and a JREF internet forum. Which one has the power to shape public opinion?

We know the difference, which begs the question why truthers are only heard from on internet forums like JREF and not on any major media outlets?
 
Some series that Fox did in 2002 regarding Israel spying in America.

Ah, I see. And how many other Fox news stories from 2002 are still available on their website?

Aside from the fact, of course, that it would be surprising to find convincing evidence that Israel was not involved in any intelligence operations involving the USA in 2002. Countries spy on each other all the time, even nominally friendly ones.

Dave
 
Ah, I see. And how many other Fox news stories from 2002 are still available on their website?

Aside from the fact, of course, that it would be surprising to find convincing evidence that Israel was not involved in any intelligence operations involving the USA in 2002. Countries spy on each other all the time, even nominally friendly ones.

Dave

I just used the wayback machine to pull up Fox's Home Page from October 1, 2002. It included a report: "Karzai's Brother on CIA Payroll."

I just spent ten minutes searching for that report on foxnews.com!

ZOMG! It is not there! Karzai's Brother is in on the inside jobby job and he used his power to have that report removed!

There was also a story about 12 naked ladies appearing in a calendar. NOT THERE! Inside jobby job.
 
I just used the wayback machine to pull up Fox's Home Page from October 1, 2002.
And of course it can pull up the Israeli story, too (2001 rather than 2002, but I assume that's the one being referred to here). Wow, what a wide ranging coverup this really isn't.
 
And of course it can pull up the Israeli story, too (2001 rather than 2002, but I assume that's the one being referred to here). Wow, what a wide ranging coverup this really isn't.

And they will respond "that is not foxnews.com...so, inside jobbity job."

This is what truthers really believe.
 
We know the difference, which begs the question why truthers are only heard from on internet forums like JREF and not on any major media outlets?

I guess besides the fact that this is wrong, you also do not understand the grand difference between a news corporation and an anonymous internet forum.

Anyway....it was his speculation, not mine; as to the FOX pulls the story CT...

Maybe Sennemut could clarify why, as many of you have pointed out, he believes this 'missing' story is worthy of CT speculation when many other stories originally from FOX cannot now be found.....ie. whats so special about this one?
 
Maybe Sennemut could clarify why, as many of you have pointed out, he believes this 'missing' story is worthy of CT speculation when many other stories originally from FOX cannot now be found.....ie. whats so special about this one?

Because he is so far down the rabbit hole that only the missing woo registers above the missing 12 naked ladies. Scraping the barrel is all thats left.
 
Well Sennemut is speculating; fair enough. His speculation is logical....

You, on the other hand, cannot understand the difference between a major media outlet such as Fox, and a JREF internet forum. Which one has the power to shape public opinion?

You realize we're not talking about the JREFF, don't you. These forums don't actually have their own video archives. Seenemut has got his/her shorts in a knot because evil Fox doesn't maintain his favorite stories FOREVER on their active web pages. As anyone can find with a few clicks they don't maintain an archive of many many older stories. Is the fact that the Cat Stuck in Tree for Four Days in Peoria story is not available proof of a grand conspiracy? Or just proof that they have a limited amount of bandwidth and choose to use it on money-making ventures?

It takes a conspiradroid mindset to make these things into boogie men.
 
did ya find it on the fox news website? news disappears sometimes. luckily people did make copies which you can find on other websites...but you will not find it on fox news anymore!
What is this obsession of yours with Fox news?
Oh, and do you have any evidence that it was removed after pressure?
 
What is this obsession of yours with Fox news?
Oh, and do you have any evidence that it was removed after pressure?

http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2002/05/07/students/print.html

"Some of the same pressures that keep government officials from criticizing Israel may also explain why the media has failed to pursue the art student enigma. Media outlets that run stories even mildly critical of Israel often find themselves targeted by organized campaigns, including form-letter e-mails, the cancellation of subscriptions, and denunciations of the organization and its reporters and editors as anti-Semites. Cameron, for example, was excoriated by various pro-Israel lobbying groups for his exposé. Representatives of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), and the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) argued that the Fox report cited only unnamed sources, provided no direct evidence, and moreover had been publicly denied by spokesmen for the FBI and others (the last, of course, is not really an argument)."

"In a December interview with Salon, CAMERA's associate director, Alex Safian, said that several "Jewish/Israeli groups" were having "conversations" with representatives of Fox News regarding Cameron's piece. Safian said he questioned Cameron's motives in running the story. "I think Fox has always been fair to Israel in its reporting," said Safian. "I think it's just Cameron who has something, personally, about Israel. He was brought up in the Middle East. Maybe that has something to do with it. Maybe he's very sympathetic to the Arab side. One could ask." The implicit suggestion was that Cameron is a bigot; in conversation, Safian would later make the same allegation about the entire editorial helm at Le Monde, which he called an anti-Semitic newspaper."
.......

"Oddly, four days after the Cameron investigation ran, all traces of his report -- transcripts, Web links, headlines -- disappeared from the Foxnews.com archives. (Normally, Fox leaves a story up for two to three weeks before consigning it to the pay archive.) When Le Monde contacted Fox in March for a copy of the original tapes, Fox News spokesmen said the request posed a problem but would not elaborate. (Fox News now says Le Monde never called.) Asked why the Cameron piece disappeared, spokesman Robert Zimmerman said it was "up there on our Web site for about two or three weeks and then it was taken down because we had to replace it with more breaking news. As you know, in a Web site you've got x amount of bandwidth -- you know, x amount of stuff you can put stuff up on [sic]. So it was replaced. Normal course of business, my friend." (In fact, a text-based story on a Web site takes up a negligible amount of bandwidth.)

When informed that Cameron's story was gone from the archives, not simply from the headline pages (when you entered the old URL, a Fox screen appeared with the message "This story no longer exists"), Zimmerman replied, "I don't know where it is."
 
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2002/05/07/students/print.html

"Some of the same pressures that keep government officials from criticizing Israel may also explain why the media has failed to pursue the art student enigma. Media outlets that run stories even mildly critical of Israel often find themselves targeted by organized campaigns, including form-letter e-mails, the cancellation of subscriptions, and denunciations of the organization and its reporters and editors as anti-Semites. Cameron, for example, was excoriated by various pro-Israel lobbying groups for his exposé. Representatives of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), and the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) argued that the Fox report cited only unnamed sources, provided no direct evidence, and moreover had been publicly denied by spokesmen for the FBI and others (the last, of course, is not really an argument)."

"In a December interview with Salon, CAMERA's associate director, Alex Safian, said that several "Jewish/Israeli groups" were having "conversations" with representatives of Fox News regarding Cameron's piece. Safian said he questioned Cameron's motives in running the story. "I think Fox has always been fair to Israel in its reporting," said Safian. "I think it's just Cameron who has something, personally, about Israel. He was brought up in the Middle East. Maybe that has something to do with it. Maybe he's very sympathetic to the Arab side. One could ask." The implicit suggestion was that Cameron is a bigot; in conversation, Safian would later make the same allegation about the entire editorial helm at Le Monde, which he called an anti-Semitic newspaper."
.......

"Oddly, four days after the Cameron investigation ran, all traces of his report -- transcripts, Web links, headlines -- disappeared from the Foxnews.com archives. (Normally, Fox leaves a story up for two to three weeks before consigning it to the pay archive.) When Le Monde contacted Fox in March for a copy of the original tapes, Fox News spokesmen said the request posed a problem but would not elaborate. (Fox News now says Le Monde never called.) Asked why the Cameron piece disappeared, spokesman Robert Zimmerman said it was "up there on our Web site for about two or three weeks and then it was taken down because we had to replace it with more breaking news. As you know, in a Web site you've got x amount of bandwidth -- you know, x amount of stuff you can put stuff up on [sic]. So it was replaced. Normal course of business, my friend." (In fact, a text-based story on a Web site takes up a negligible amount of bandwidth.)

When informed that Cameron's story was gone from the archives, not simply from the headline pages (when you entered the old URL, a Fox screen appeared with the message "This story no longer exists"), Zimmerman replied, "I don't know where it is."

You still having trouble finding the link to that series sport?

Oh oh! I know where it is!! Do you need a freaking link? Do you, Himmler? I have it, if you need it. You need it? You a big Fox News Fan, short bus?

Do you? You find the link to those other stories that are not on their website anymore?

ZOMG! FOX News, who produced the god damn series and broadcast it on their cable news site: IS IN ON IT! GENIUS! Hiding it in plain site, huh?

COSSIGA!??? LULZ!!!
 

Back
Top Bottom