British Chiropractic Association v Simon Singh

It's a reprint of a message printed originally in Sense About Science just over a week ago.
 
4381185527_ff8c28c45a.jpg


I must say he has an individual style. :)
 
Updates from JackofKent (via Twitter)
Jack of Kent said:
BCA given deliciously hard time in Court of Appeal.
Lord Chief Justice "baffled" why case has got this far, "surprised" BCA not take Right of Reply
Judgment reserved. More later.
Lord Chief Justice asked why if BCA's evidence existed, why didn't they just publish it?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
BillyJoe said:
[qimg]http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4049/4381185527_ff8c28c45a.jpg[/qimg]

I must say he has an individual style. :)
Click to expand...
"Unique?" Please define the word. ****-o-dear, it isn't because he is DARK, is it? 'Cuz I know I've tried that hairdo. :rolleyes:
 
I do wonder- If a judge is driving on ice and goes into a skid, does he turn into the skid, or adjourn for a month to consider meteorological reports ?
What in hell can they think of by Easter that they didn't think of yesterday?
__________________________________________________________________

Farsight- your last post is more substantive than the earlier ones. If you want to start a thread on the issues you raise- eg the iniquities of the peer-review system, by all means go for it.
 
I almost agree with Soapy Sam. Do they need to consult anybody or anything? If so that should be part of the hearing. Give them twice as long as the hearing at the most to think about it and write up a report which should be mostly a cut and paste job anyway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom