• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator

Status
Not open for further replies.
Years? Your OP states that it will hit the market within a year. Time is of the essence!

They will hit the market in a year, but it will take a few years to ramp up production.

They will take over the energy market much like cell phones took over the phone market. It will happen quickly, but not overnight.
 
Investment capital is limited. Obviously Mills made the right choice when he decided to focus on SunCell development rather than taking the CHIT cell to market.



Yes, because obviously dominating the energy industry for the last 8 years would have been completely worthless.

Because obviously he couldn't have just sold the rights to the earlier device to one of his many supporters or investors, and let them take the commercial risks over the last 8 years.

And this of course perfectly explains the (at least) 3 other times he's made these sorts of announcements, including at least one in the period in which he's so cleverly working on this device which is only just now ready for deployment (this year for sure!).

Yes, believing all of that is far more sensible than assuming he's been full of **** this whole time.
 
<snip>
Nonetheless I am not asking for any investment in Galactic Core at this time. But I do have money-printing machine that members here can purchase of $99.98 (buy before midnight tonight and I will include a second one free, plus shipping and handling). They produce absolutely authentic USA currency from plain paper with no limits. I wish I did not have to, but I must sell these money printers: I need the quick cash.
<snip>

If you need quick cash, why not just print it with the money printers? :D
 
He's been making the exact same "This year for sure!" claims every few years for literally decades now. At what point do you start assuming he's more likely wrong than more likely right?

OK, let's try to be fair here. Mills is an MD. Naturally, he's used to getting paid huge piles of money for delivering absolutely no results whatsoever.

The important thing is his bedside manner. Does he make me feel all warm and fuzzy? Sure he does. I want to believe in low/no cost energy for all. I want to solve the world's problems too.

As a doctor, he knows we are all mortal. Extend the deadline and watch early adopters die off from old age. All of us mortal, most of us stupid. It's only natural that a highly trained, very intelligent person should freely prey on us schmucks. I for one will gladly expose my throat to the sweet-talking wolf. If not Dr. Mills, then some other.
 
Last edited:
Yes, because obviously dominating the energy industry for the last 8 years would have been completely worthless.

Because obviously he couldn't have just sold the rights to the earlier device to one of his many supporters or investors, and let them take the commercial risks over the last 8 years.

And this of course perfectly explains the (at least) 3 other times he's made these sorts of announcements, including at least one in the period in which he's so cleverly working on this device which is only just now ready for deployment (this year for sure!).

Yes, believing all of that is far more sensible than assuming he's been full of **** this whole time.


Ok.

Don't believe me.

We'll find out who is right, just like we found out who was right about Bitcoin.
 
Yeah, I stated in the OP that there would be plenty of naysayers who haven't done their homework claiming what you just claimed.



You also, rather arrogantly, assume that "naysayers" haven't also been following BLP all this time.
 
They will hit the market in a year, but it will take a few years to ramp up production.

They will take over the energy market much like cell phones took over the phone market. It will happen quickly, but not overnight.

But cell phones didn't take over the phone market, at least not in the way you are talking about. I still pay for phone service. I pay the same people as before.
 
Ok.

Don't believe me.

We'll find out who is right, just like we found out who was right about Bitcoin.

Well since you've made your millions in bitcoin already, would you like to make a small wager on whether or not BLP ever actually succeeds in anything other than ripping off investors?

*ETA: guess I'm not the only one who thought this
 
Terms?

Amount?



You said in the OP: "I'm here to let you know that free energy generators will be hitting the market within a year".

So, I say that BLP will not have any (working!) "free energy generators" on the market by the 9th of January, 2018.

How does $100 sound?
 
You said in the OP: "I'm here to let you know that free energy generators will be hitting the market within a year".

So, I say that BLP will not have any (working!) "free energy generators" on the market by the 9th of January, 2018.

How does $100 sound?

According to Columbia Tech, they will be field testing in 6 months and be ready for production 6 months after that. So I would not take that bet without a six month window for design modifications.

I'd wager a $100 they will have production units installed in customers businesses within 1.5 years for sure. Cutting it to a year is too close to Columbia Tech's projected timeline.

So what exactly constitutes "hitting the market" according to you? They plan on initially leasing units to fixed businesses like restaurants or manufacturing centers, then moving on to setting up leasing centers in the same fashion as the solar market for residential is setup now.

So they might not offer public leases for sale like a car dealership at first, but rather negotiate with individual businesses for lease terms. If we go by my metric of units installed in customer's business, would a fully functional prototype installation count?
 
.....I base my views off evidence, that makes me a crackpot according to you. Conversely, I think people who base their beliefs off hopes and dreams are crackpots.

For a start, I don't do beliefs. Secondly, hope is OK, and dreams are stuff you have at night asleep. Finally, my world view is evidence based. I've actually worked on some climate science evidence myself, so I happen to know that you are wrong and the rest of the world is right on that one. The rest of the guff you advocate isn't based on evidence at all, and your idea that this free-energy crap is evidence based is beyond laughable.

I ask again, why would you think that anyone here has any interest in makey-uppie bollocks about "free energy"? Is your am just self-promotion? Oh, and how many Bitcoins have you personally invested in this scam?
 
You said in the OP: "I'm here to let you know that free energy generators will be hitting the market within a year".

So, I say that BLP will not have any (working!) "free energy generators" on the market by the 9th of January, 2018.

How does $100 sound?

How about betting the amount he made off Bitcoin?
 
Has everyone forgotten Andrea RossiWP and his energy catalyser? Alas, not producing useful power ... yet!
 
According to Columbia Tech, they will be field testing in 6 months and be ready for production 6 months after that. So I would not take that bet without a six month window for design modifications.

I'd wager a $100 they will have production units installed in customers businesses within 1.5 years for sure. Cutting it to a year is too close to Columbia Tech's projected timeline.

So what exactly constitutes "hitting the market" according to you? They plan on initially leasing units to fixed businesses like restaurants or manufacturing centers, then moving on to setting up leasing centers in the same fashion as the solar market for residential is setup now.

So they might not offer public leases for sale like a car dealership at first, but rather negotiate with individual businesses for lease terms. If we go by my metric of units installed in customer's business, would a fully functional prototype installation count?


With regards to that last question, I would say "no".

"So what exactly constitutes "hitting the market" according to you?"

I'd say, a commercial product freely available to at least one segment of the open market not associated with BLP (other than as customers, obviously), that are installed and independently operating to the satisfaction of the customer. "Installed and independently operating to the satisfaction of the customer" would have to be determined by unambiguous statements from such customers for some significant period following the installation.

A "prototype" installation could still be a fraud, if people associated with BLP still have routine access to it.

The "unambiguous statements" and "some significant period following the installation" would be required, because there have been previous cases where BLP has claimed to have signed contracts for their devices, to much rejoicing in the initial press releases, only to have such sales disappear down the memory hole, as the customer doesn't want to advertise that they were scammed.

I'll grant you the extra 6 months. So, July 9, 2018?
 
Well, you can listen to this guy, or you can see it run with your own two eyes. The reactor can achieve a self-sustaining mode when the silver vapor pressure becomes adequate. Meaning you can shut off all external power to the reactor and the reaction will sustain itself. Here's a video looking into the reactor demonstrating this effect:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUBheBH9eio

We've seen videos of dozens, maybe hundreds, of free energy devices working.

So what?

When do we see one actually and openly in service?
 
Last edited:
Has everyone forgotten Andrea RossiWP and his energy catalyser? Alas, not producing useful power ... yet!



Pfft. Rossi's a piker compared to BLP! He's been pulling his scam for what, maybe a decade now? Pfft I say!
 
Yeah, I stated in the OP that there would be plenty of naysayers who haven't done their homework claiming what you just claimed.

Mills did have a product ready to go commercial back in 2009. This product was called the CHIT cell. This was a much bulkier, far less powerful, far more expensive type of generator.

Mills decided against taking this to market after discovering new novel properties of the hydrino that allowed for far greater amounts of energy to be produced around the time the CHIT cell was being planned for production.

Rather than spend the money on a commercial launch of the CIHT cell, Mills decided to spend his investment capital on further research. This eventually lead to the creation of the SunCell type generator described in the OP.

For comparison, the CHIT cell prototype generator was producing 10 watts of continuous power. The SunCell prototype reactor is dumping out 1 million watts continuous power, with a planned 100 kw generator output.

Investment capital is limited. Obviously Mills made the right choice when he decided to focus on SunCell development rather than taking the CHIT cell to market.
I don't think this CHIT passes the sniff test.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom