junkshop
Otto's Favourite
Yes, you have linked to the ME's description and interpretation of the wounds, and yes, you have linked to other sources that make a very convincing argument that it is unreasonable to conclude that the fatal wounds were self-inflicted. These were useful.It's not chatter. It's a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ description of the difference in post and antemortem wounds. Did you just come here to bitch? Is that your main thing now? If you want actual experts then read the ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ thread. I've linked to the ME saying one of the wounds was postmortem, I've linked to technology showing one of the wounds was impossible to inflict by herself, and the way the investigation and process has been run is highly suspicious.
If you have something to add, then add it. If not, feel free to go cry somewhere else. You obviously have nothing of value to bring to the table.
Having done that, you have then prompted ChatGPT to chatsplain the difference between pre and post mortem wounds. This was not useful. ChatGPT and other LLM AIs are known to hallucinate (make ◊◊◊◊ up). Until this weakness is solved, They are not, in my opinion, a valid or reliable source for any infomation.
My argument (and maybe it was poorly made) was that citing the result that ChatGPT was prompted to make added nothing of value to the conversation.
Oh, and just for the record, I will cry wherever and whenever the the ◊◊◊◊ I feel like it.