AIUI The EU invested €336million in AstraZeneca, including in the UK, to the extent of €28m specifically to expand the production lines.
I will treat your claim that the UK 100% paid for development of the vaccine with Oxford and that the EU investment did not include the UK production lines as your opinion rather than fact. This is because you have presented your case as the EU trying to cheat the UK out of its vaccinations.
AIUI The EU invested €336million in AstraZeneca, including in the UK, to the extent of €28m specifically to expand the production lines.
I will treat your claim that the UK 100% paid for development of the vaccine with Oxford and that the EU investment did not include the UK production lines as your opinion rather than fact. This is because you have presented your case as the EU trying to cheat the UK out of its vaccinations.
So I take it that you can find no evidence to support your assertion.
Try reading this
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54303061
or this
https://www.biopharma-reporter.com/...9-vaccine-production-sets-vaccination-targets
or this
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_1438
or this
https://www.ft.com/content/8b48a853-5b14-4378-91d4-17026fa15472
I think from the EU sources that the EU invested only by loans from the EIB in manufacturing, otherwise they only advance ordered allowing AZ to spend that money on manufacturing capacity for those orders.
Yes, this is self interest. What they are saying is that they will not impose trade barriers / tariffs on UK produced vaccine but regard it as if it had been produced in the EU. Entirely reasonable in the circumstances.
What is not reasonable to say is that the output of vaccine produced in the EU should be prioritised for EU use and exports out of the EU will be restricted to select third countries (excluding the UK) and for the purposes of this case the UK factory is defined as being within the EU therefore AZ have to prioritise output of the UK factory for EU use.
The EU Commission admitted being in the wrong, why are you still defending something they themselves won't?
The EU Commission admitted being in the wrong, why are you still defending something they themselves won't?
Will we get a referendum on joining the trans-Pacific trading bloc and become subject to their rules, regulations and tribunal?
Once they find out there are 'Muslim countries' in it they will probably change their mind about wanting to join. Raab is still struggling... he can find the Pacific on his map but no sign of the Trans.
Will we get a referendum on joining the trans-Pacific trading bloc and become subject to their rules, regulations and tribunal?
Once they find out there are 'Muslim countries' in it they will probably change their mind about wanting to join.
There's always a cost to such things and taxpayers money is involved.
So there is a case for a referendum.
But it isn't a political union, is it ?
It has no analogue of the EU commission or parliament, it isn't a customs union with a common external tariff and it does not interfere with the internal affairs of it's members.
Hardly surprising, the Brexiteers desperately need to distract attention from the abject failure that is Brexit.What a surprise that a Brexiteer sees things as the EU robbing the UK.
How long before the Daily Mail blames Muslims and the Brexiteers swallow that too?
The EU has told British fishermen they are indefinitely banned from selling live mussels, oysters, clams, cockles and scallops to its member states.
As the UK is now a separate country, it is not allowed to transport the animals to the EU unless they have already been treated in purification plants.
But the industry says it does not have enough tanks ready and the process can slow exports, making them less viable.
The UK government previously said it thought the restrictions on exports of bivalve molluscs - such as mussels, clams, cockles, scallops and oysters - would end on 21 April.
This was because Brussels was "expected" to change its rules on that date to allow unpurified shellfish in from non-member states.
But it has emerged - as first reported by Politics Home - that the European Commission wrote to leading UK companies on 13 and 19 January to tell them the current arrangement was in fact permanent.
More evidence that the geniuses in Westminster didn't read and/or understand the Brexit deal. The UK can no longer export live shellfish to the EU.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55903599
This is the bit where it's clear that Boris Johnson and his numpty friends didn't understand (or maybe didn't care) what they had signed us up for: