The Shank
All Hail King Murali
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2006
- Messages
- 1,342
Is that what you meant?
Sigh.
Is that what you meant?
My ballot paper didn't say (and everything that goes with it)
Vote leave did say....
Technological and economic forces are changing the world fast. EU institutions cannot cope. We have lost control of vital policies. This is damaging. We need a new relationship. What happens if we vote 'leave'?
We should negotiate a new UK-EU deal based on free trade and friendly cooperation. We end the supremacy of EU law. We regain control. We stop sending £350 million every week to Brussels and instead spend it on our priorities, like the NHS and science research.
We regain our seats on international institutions like the World Trade Organisation so we are a more influential force for free trade and international cooperation.
A vote to 'leave' and a better, friendlier relationship with the EU is much safer than giving Brussels more power and money every year.
Is this what you voted for?
And another sigh.
I voted to leave the European Union. Full stop.
I'll take that as a no. You can't articulate why the country level is the most appropriate.Can you explain why it shouldn't be?
311 years to be exact.The UK has existed as a political entity for a fair amount of time
This is a joke right? The current government isn't doing that now, even leaving aside Brexit. For a third of its history, the British government was effectively appointed by the land owners and run for their benefit.and has generally made decisions to the benefit of the constituents.
I already know that. I asked why you believe that to be the case. As a supplementary question I'd like to know why you think it wasn't being run at that level before Brexit.Personally, I have confidence in the UK as the most appropriate level of government for the UK,
whilst I have little confidence that decisions made at a continental level by whatever EU majority concensus exists at the time will be to the benefit of the UK, and may well be to the disbenefit of the UK.
It's not just the travel though. There are many opportunities that are now closed to us, for example, we are practically shut out of European science.People travelled and worked in Europe before the EU. True, you had to ask first, so yes it's likely to be more onerous, but not impossible.
The mainland European countries weren't our enemies then, they aren't now and won't be after Brexit.
Why are we ditching all of these constraints and going through all this chaos just to enact the same constraints?I expect to find an equivalent protections enacted by the UK.
Ever closer union within the EU would inevitably eventually involve losing that ability, and that is what I call loss of sovereignty.
Is that different to what Vote Leave campaigned for?
Does it matter?
The question on the voting form could not have been clearer
'Leave the European Union' (and everything that goes with it)
Be honest: when you voted leave did you understand "everything that goes with it" to include food shortages and the M20 being turned into a car park? Or Britain being excluded from European science or your driving licence not being valid in France?
I could also reply to this with 'does it matter'.
But have all of these things happened yet?
And another sigh.
I voted to leave the European Union. Full stop.
'If' these things do happen 'if' we leave with no deal. Will it be a case of people saying "I didn't see that coming, why didn't anyone tell us about this problem"?
That's fine. Meanwhile ceptimus is blaming all false/true predictions and actual outcomes on remainers and the EU. That was, clearly, the point I was making.
He is making irrational points. At some point Brexiteers have to accept that the bad outcomes are down to them. Will you?
'Leave the European Union' (and everything that goes with it)
I could also reply to this with 'does it matter'.
But have all of these things happened yet?
Wrong. I'm accusing Remain of making incorrect predictions, and warning people that the predictions they are currently making are also likely to be incorrect.That's fine. Meanwhile ceptimus is blaming all false/true predictions and actual outcomes on remainers and the EU. That was, clearly, the point I was making.
He is making irrational points. At some point Brexiteers have to accept that the bad outcomes are down to them. Will you?
Well no, people were assured that we would either retain our current trading terms with the EU or get better ones. Now maybe you knew better but are you really going to claim everyone who voted leave ignored that promise, or the infamous '£350 million a week'?
If we are allowed to leave then I accept that there will be outcomes, some good, some bad. No one yet knows what these will be exactly; right now we only have (probably inaccurate) forecasts.
And what 'if' these things don't happen?