• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Breitbart MUST be destroyed.

NoahFence said:
Yes, but here's the key difference that's flying right over many a head:

There is actual evidence of Trump declaring a desire to destroy this country.

Hillary, not so much.
Click to expand...

Feel free to present your actual evidence of Trump declaring a desire to destroy this country. I feel quite certain that you have a direct quote from him that does not require any interpretation at all--something along the lines of "I have a yuge desire to destroy the USA."

Or is it all just your interpretation of things he has said?
:rolleyes:
 
NoahFence said:
Yes, but here's the key difference that's flying right over many a head:

There is actual evidence of Trump declaring a desire to destroy this country.

Hillary, not so much.
Click to expand...

And yet, Hillary pushed for Trump to win the Republican nomination. If he's really such a threat to our very survival, what does that say about Hillary?
 
Really? Putin is about to use tactical nukes in Syria, and you are worried about Breitbart?
 
Brainster said:
Feel free to present your actual evidence of Trump declaring a desire to destroy this country. I feel quite certain that you have a direct quote from him that does not require any interpretation at all--something along the lines of "I have a yuge desire to destroy the USA."

Or is it all just your interpretation of things he has said?
:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Jail his opponents.
Muzzle the press.
Make nice with world despots.
Call for "2nd Amendment Solutions"

Take the *********** blinders off, kiddo.

I suppose if (when?) he outright calls for violence, you'll ignore that too.
 
Drewbot said:
Really? Putin is about to use tactical nukes in Syria, and you are worried about Breitbart?
Click to expand...

I'm worried about the (lack of) mentality they espouse and the growing numbers of people who embrace it.

This whole Trump fiasco has a real chance to be one of the moments in US history that doesn't get forgotten. Up there with 9/11 or Pearl Harbor only in slow motion.
 
NoahFence said:
Jail his opponents.
Muzzle the press.
Make nice with world despots.
Call for "2nd Amendment Solutions"

Take the *********** blinders off, kiddo.

I suppose if (when?) he outright calls for violence, you'll ignore that too.
Click to expand...

I've got a guy within shouting distance from where I now sit that would agree 110% with you on everything but the bolded, except he believes it about President Obama.

You're working the low end of the street, and I don't like the guy (Trump) anymore than you do.
 
Ziggurat said:
Hillary's own campaign emails. She tried to pull a McCaskill/Akin. Was this not obvious even before the email leaked? It should have been.
Click to expand...

#1 - Assuming that's true is a stretch.

#2 - If it IS true, then so what? She knew Donald Trump. She knew all this stuff was coming. If you were trying to win something, anything, wouldn't it be easier to do so against a complete and total moron?
 
Ziggurat said:
And yet, Hillary pushed for Trump to win the Republican nomination. If he's really such a threat to our very survival, what does that say about Hillary?
Click to expand...

That she thinks he'd be easiest to beat. What else?
 
Last edited:
NoahFence said:
#1 - Assuming that's true is a stretch.
Click to expand...

There's no assumption involved here, but it's funny to see you try to cover your ignorance with denialism.

#2 - If it IS true, then so what? She knew Donald Trump. She knew all this stuff was coming. If you were trying to win something, anything, wouldn't it be easier to do so against a complete and total moron?
Click to expand...

I'm sure she thought exactly that. But the point is, easier or not, Trump might still win. The odds aren't 0%. Hillary is willing to risk Trump being president. So again, what does that say about Hillary?
 
Not sure how long Breitbart will survive after this election. When Trump loses it will be obvious that the publication is controlled by the (((Bunnies))).
 
Ziggurat said:
There's no assumption involved here, but it's funny to see you try to cover your ignorance with denialism.
Click to expand...

'Cuz nothing's going fishy with these wikileaks, huh? Nothing questionable?



I'm sure she thought exactly that. But the point is, easier or not, Trump might still win. The odds aren't 0%. Hillary is willing to risk Trump being president. So again, what does that say about Hillary?
Click to expand...

That she's intelligent and weighed the pros and cons.

Any chance of you discussing the matter at hand? That Breitbart is playing a huge part in the dumbing down of America? Or do you not notice for plainly obvious reasons?
 
Ziggurat said:
I'm sure she thought exactly that. But the point is, easier or not, Trump might still win. The odds aren't 0%. Hillary is willing to risk Trump being president. So again, what does that say about Hillary?
Click to expand...

Amazing. You're so dead-set against Hillary that you're setting yourself up to blame Trump on her?

Is there any evil she's not responsible for?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom