• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Breitbart MUST be destroyed.

Maybe a humour thread ? Britebart is nothing AFAIK, Breitbart OTOH is infamous.

or it is a typo and those "infamous" people did another stupid thing.
 
Care to elaborate?

The piece of **** that runs Britebart also runs the Trump campaign.

The Trump campaign appears to not be willing to stop until he's destroyed the country. All because of the uppity ****** that destroyed him at the Correspondent's dinner.
 
The piece of **** that runs Britebart also runs the Trump campaign.

The Trump campaign appears to not be willing to stop until he's destroyed the country. All because of the uppity ****** that destroyed him at the Correspondent's dinner.


First of all, Trump has been considering running for President at least since the 1990s, long before Obama's career started. Second, Trump had set the tone of his campaign long before Bannon became involved.

Third, I don't think that blaming a media outlet is ever correct. Breitbart didn't exist in a vacuum. Its popularity comes from the fact that people wanted to read such content. The desire for the website predated the website. At best, it is only a single part of a complicated feedback loop. Destroying it (even if Constitutionally possible) wouldn't change anything.
 
Like I give a ****.

But if you are going to nuke them from orbit, you're going to need the correct co-ordinates. You won't get the correct co-ordinates if you enter the wrong name into the control gizmo.
 
The piece of **** that runs Britebart also runs the Trump campaign.

The Trump campaign appears to not be willing to stop until he's destroyed the country. All because of the uppity ****** that destroyed him at the Correspondent's dinner.

The irony here is quite astonishing.
 
Do tell.

How is it ironic that I'm upset a bunch of retards are trying to destroy the country?

What is really funny is those incompetent tools and liars actually think they are trying to save it - or are sly and make their slovenly, incompetent followers believe that. Either way, the are really just malevolent thugs dressed like real persons.
 
Isn't that exactly what the Breitbart guy and Trump would say Hillary is planning to do?

Yes, but here's the key difference that's flying right over many a head:

There is actual evidence of Trump declaring a desire to destroy this country.

Hillary, not so much.
 

Back
Top Bottom