Eos of the Eons
Mad Scientist
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2003
- Messages
- 13,749
Geez, I was under the impression we were discussing hermaphrodites, not kids with cleft palates...sheesh.
When a kid has ambiguous genitalia (that is of course not detrimental to their health), who are you to decide if they are a boy or a girl?
Which are they most genetically? Are they xx or xy? Even then, with their gonads not matured, how do you know which will be the hormones that affect the body most later on?
Even then, the person may still be attracted to males or females depending how their brains are wired.
If you turn a person completely into a guy, thus destroying all of the femal genitalia, then it is going to take a heck of a lot more surgery to become female after being turned into a male.
Add on top of that, if the kid doesn't know how they came into the world, the dilemma of being gay. Society is not kind there either, especially if the parents are religious.
Leaving the child alone and letting them know they have some choice in their sexuality would be less devastating then above scenarios.
Who are we to decide who they are? Why should the parents get to have all the power in their child's physical make up when they don't know the child's actual sexuality?
What if they have a uterus and ovaries, and the parents decide to hang onto the penis cause that is easier than lopping it off, and then adding on testes where the vagina was? The kid would be sterile, when it may not have had to be. Or the other way around. There are testes, but also a vagina, and they lob off the penis?
From the ambiguity I've seen, if left to the parents' choice only, they could really destroy the kid's chances of fertility.
There is always more to it than the 'external' look of things.
Waiting until the child matures to see what developes mentally and physically is far more fair.
When a kid has ambiguous genitalia (that is of course not detrimental to their health), who are you to decide if they are a boy or a girl?
Which are they most genetically? Are they xx or xy? Even then, with their gonads not matured, how do you know which will be the hormones that affect the body most later on?
Even then, the person may still be attracted to males or females depending how their brains are wired.
If you turn a person completely into a guy, thus destroying all of the femal genitalia, then it is going to take a heck of a lot more surgery to become female after being turned into a male.
Add on top of that, if the kid doesn't know how they came into the world, the dilemma of being gay. Society is not kind there either, especially if the parents are religious.
Leaving the child alone and letting them know they have some choice in their sexuality would be less devastating then above scenarios.
Who are we to decide who they are? Why should the parents get to have all the power in their child's physical make up when they don't know the child's actual sexuality?
What if they have a uterus and ovaries, and the parents decide to hang onto the penis cause that is easier than lopping it off, and then adding on testes where the vagina was? The kid would be sterile, when it may not have had to be. Or the other way around. There are testes, but also a vagina, and they lob off the penis?
From the ambiguity I've seen, if left to the parents' choice only, they could really destroy the kid's chances of fertility.
There is always more to it than the 'external' look of things.
Waiting until the child matures to see what developes mentally and physically is far more fair.