Merged Boston Marathon CTs

trustbutverify said:
Are we talkin the Buzz Aldrin treatment?
Click to expand...

It'll make the Buzz Aldrin encounter look like a 7 year-old girl's tea party. All you need to do is call up some of the leather-lounged, blue collar boys in Dorchester, Southie, and Brockton, and let them know what's going on. That's why I think the Westboro Baptist Church may want to reconsider coming to picket the funeral.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Just saying

How better to convince people to participate in an end justifies the means attack than by minimizing collateral damage?
Click to expand...

For what? What is the "end goal" for this bombing that could be considered helpful for the government?

Shadow cabal: "I think we should plant a bomb at the Boston Marathon"
Shadow cabal #2: "Ok, we can have it detonate right when the average time to complete the marathon comes."
Shadow cabal: "I like it, then as soon as it happens we can use it as an excuse to _____________"

That's what I want to know, now that it's happened what does the government have to gain? Where is the upside on this?

The downside? Exposure. If they're exposed then a myriad of bad **** can happen. Everything from a protest to full fledged revolt. Meaning the upside of this has to be extreme. So what is it?
 
Last edited:
Brass said:
I dare any protestor to come to Boston, obviously and specifically Copley Square and just try to say this stuff to our faces.

Also, there was absolutely no one saying "this is only a drill" or anything close to it, after the bomb went off like so many claim.
Click to expand...

What he said.

:mad:
 
Brass said:
It'll make the Buzz Aldrin encounter look like a 7 year-old girl's tea party. All you need to do is call up some of the leather-lounged, blue collar boys in Dorchester, Southie, and Brockton, and let them know what's going on. That's why I think the Westboro Baptist Church may want to reconsider coming to picket the funeral.
Click to expand...

Don't forget Weymouth. We're badass.

Well, sorta.

:)
 
Praktik said:
Yep, reasonable people can disagree. May I just suggest messageboard comments and youtube comments are probably not the best indicators of their inner minds and that we are probably on firmer ground to see them as misguided than we are to see them as actively, consciously callous and evil.
Click to expand...
I disagree, I think comments on messageboards and youtube reveal the inner minds of people. They are free to say what they really think and they do so consciously.
 
plague311 said:
The downside? Exposure. If they're exposed then a myriad of bad **** can happen. Everything from a protest to full fledged revolt. Meaning the upside of this has to be extreme. So what is it?
Click to expand...

Being Evil.

All jokes aside it seems to be the perceived upside is the maintenance of an atmosphere of fear - a general condition that eases pathways to wars abroad and more security clampdowns at home.

This construction has the advantage of having connections to a variety of CT mainstays like impending martial law and neo-imperialism, and also is so generalized a benefit that it defies anyone's attempts to connect these alleged benefits clearly and directly to the events of the day.

In short, its a perfect allegation for a CTer to make, with wide resonance in their circles and enough CT mainstays in it to make for a very easy digestion amongst their audience.

But let's not forget that really aside from all these specifics, the TRUE upside is REALLY "being evil" - CTers live inside a comic book and American leaders are like Skeletor and Lex Luthor, pursuing evil for evil's sake.
 
Last edited:
I went to Weymouth visiting Honeywell.

We went to a restaurant in Boston. An old factory. The waitresses abused the customers.


I remember almost flying into the drink approaching the airport.
 
Last edited:
trustbutverify said:
I think some of the Sandyhook victims, who were personally attacked by phone and mail by the CT action squad after having their children machine-gunned, might have a different perspective on all this.

It seems more than possible to me that most of these "investigators" are garden variety creeps and bullies who found a new toy to play with.
Click to expand...

yeah they are all alike, ain't it. :rolleyes:
 
Spindrift said:
I disagree, I think comments on messageboards and youtube reveal the inner minds of people. They are free to say what they really think and they do so consciously.
Click to expand...

I disagree with your disagreement!

Issue being that without the personal connection to the individual, the lack of body language, the lack of prior history that we can imbue comments with a lot more than was intended by the author.

Happens all the time even when just chatting on gmail chat w/ people I KNOW - we have that prior history - but the lack of all those cues makes for easy misinterpretation.

With strangers? Even easier.

But I agree there is a little element of liberation having a shield of anonymity, some ideas may be expressed that would be hidden in real life at a dinner party. But the other side of the coin is our ability to misinterpret increases as well.
 
DC said:
yeah they are all alike, ain't it. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Well based on the major examples who post here, yes, yes they are. From JFK to 9-11 they share the same basic characteristics as those spouting off about yesterday's events as a false flag attack.
 
Clayton Moore said:
I was there visiting Honeywell.

We went to a restaurant in Boston. An old factory. The waitresses abused the customers.


I remember almost flying into the drink approaching the airport.
Click to expand...

There is absolutely nothing - nothing that could make me give a :rule10: about what you do and where you do it.
 
Frankly, if the authorities had known who did it within 24 hours without giving as much as a shred of evidence, THEN you'd have a good point for a conspiracy theory. Now they're just clueless.
 
Dash80 said:
WHAT THE **** IS WRONG WITH THESE "PEOPLE?!"
:(
Click to expand...
It would be nice if we knew, then we could develop a vaccine or something.
Earlier, I spent a few minutes browsing the clueless forum and had to wash my brain out afterwards with half an hour of kitten videos.

(ETA: I'm not joking. I felt so heartsick that I genuinely sought out out cute fluffy kittens to look at - they're a cure for almost anything.)
 
Last edited:
Simon666 said:
Frankly, if the authorities had known who did it within 24 hours without giving as much as a shred of evidence, THEN you'd have a good point for a conspiracy theory. Now they're just clueless.
Click to expand...

Actually they have lots of clues it's just that they are solutionless at the moment.
 
Family Guy apparently predicted the bombings. Number one suspect in my list of the potential bombers is therefore Peter Griffin.
 
sophia8 said:
It would be nice if we knew, then we could develop a vaccine or something.
Earlier, I spent a few minutes browsing the clueless forum and had to wash my brain out afterwards with half an hour of kitten videos.
Click to expand...

Ah yes, but how would we ever GIVE them the vaccine, steeped as they are in anti-vax?

Maybe if we could put it in an aerosol, and maybe install some tanks in all commercial flights across america, we could basically spray trails of these chemicals that stop CT thinking (hmm, maybe we should call these "chemtrails"? Any takers??) and have the vaccine applied through all commercial air traffic. If a spot lacks coverage from lack of flyover, say portions of Alaska, we could get a few military planes up to fill any gaps left by the lack of commercial coverage in a given area.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom