• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Boston Marathon CTs

Because these drills are being conducted pretty much everywhere all the time? I guarantee you someone, somewhere held a mass casualty drill this past weekend; probably more than one. Last weekend too. Expect a few to be conducted next weekend as well, and etc.
 
Oh really, you think they are everywhere and all the time. Some how I doubt they occur as frequent as you'd like to think.

Look at these videos of actors depicting jeff bauman and adrienne haslet

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYWRX_ro5cY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJ3z6T-WI7Q

You wana tell me these people had limbs blown off and now they're all chirpy and positive just weeks later doing media interviews. Get outta here, just another psy op.

Night guys.
 
You probably won't respond but:

What is your standard of evidence needed so that you would concede that these people existed, and that the commonly accepted narrative is most likely correct. I ask because I've met conspiricists that would sooner lob off their appendages than admit that sometimes, **** just happens.
 
And how coincidental that these 'drills' always seem to take place just before an alleged terrr' attack.

So what? Why is that suspicious? I've heard this point before, but I've never heard anyone explain how it actually indicates a psy-op or whatever.

Look at these videos of actors depicting jeff bauman and adrienne haslet

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYWRX_ro5cY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJ3z6T-WI7Q

You wana tell me these people had limbs blown off and now they're all chirpy and positive just weeks later doing media interviews. Get outta here, just another psy op.

Yes, because every single person in the world who loses a limb will be depressed every waking moment of their lives for several weeks after the fact. And you know this because you have such extensive experience with amputees, right?
 
Oh really, you think they are everywhere and all the time. Some how I doubt they occur as frequent as you'd like to think.

Look at these videos of actors depicting jeff bauman and adrienne haslet

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYWRX_ro5cY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJ3z6T-WI7Q

You wana tell me these people had limbs blown off and now they're all chirpy and positive just weeks later doing media interviews. Get outta here, just another psy op.

Night guys.
Right. Argumentum ad youtubem. Get back to me when you have held a mans hand as he shuffled off this mortal coil due to gross trauma. Get back to me when you have felt that awful moment when life slips away, and that that dying hand slips out of your own. Get back to me when you have experienced that moment of death. Maybe then you will have an opinion worth considering. Maybe then you will realise there is a world beyond the basement. Maybe then, but I doubt it.
 
You probably won't respond but:

What is your standard of evidence needed so that you would concede that these people existed, and that the commonly accepted narrative is most likely correct. I ask because I've met conspiricists that would sooner lob off their appendages than admit that sometimes, **** just happens.

No, **** like this doesn't just happen. It's meticulously planned, but they still don't do a great job and end up leaving plenty of clues.

I have a hard time believing any big news (propaganda) piece, not just this one, due to government/central bank/media conglomerates that have as much power and secrecy as they seem to need, in order to get away with these stunts. So at this point, the standard of evidence needs to be way more convincing from now on if i'm to be made a believer (sheep)

Abbaddon: stop waffling your pointless rhetoric I have no idea what you're even getting at, but you certainly haven't addressed any of the facts that i've presented. You say " get back to me" three times and "maybe then" three times. Has some one been implementing the magical power of three into their everyday dialogue..
 
Last edited:
No, **** like this doesn't just happen. It's meticulously planned, but they still don't do a great job and end up leaving plenty of clues.

I have a hard time believing any big news (propaganda) piece, not just this one, due to government/central bank/media conglomerates that have as much power and secrecy as they seem to need, in order to get away with these stunts. So at this point, the standard of evidence needs to be way more convincing from now on if i'm to be made a believer (sheep)
Yet you fail to identify this so called plan, nor any reason for it. Why?
 
No, **** like this doesn't just happen. It's meticulously planned, but they still don't do a great job and end up leaving plenty of clues.

I have a hard time believing any big news (propaganda) piece, not just this one, due to government/central bank/media conglomerates that have as much power and secrecy as they seem to need, in order to get away with these stunts. So at this point, the standard of evidence needs to be way more convincing from now on if i'm to be made a believer (sheep)

What is your criteria for determining whether a source is lying or telling the truth?
 
What it means, is that these images do not represent reality in the way that they are intended to. They are just a part of the overall lie.



^This is what they pass off as a real life bombing scene. Pathetic.

Well seeing as it how looks just like a real life bombing scene I fail to see your point.

If you think that photo was taken at a bomb scene, then you are a fool. Pretend bomb scene, maybe. How convenient that these photographers are always there at the most opportune moments to take their shots?

http://i39.tinypic.com/2jfy9lc.jpg

You think it weird that people take lots of photos in this day and age when selfy duck face shots alone number in the millions?

what about the fake charity fund raisers. Bucks for bauman? the last report i read re that, it was saying they'd collected 360k in donations. Now thats some serious scam monies if it turns out that jeff bauman is indeed a fabricated entity.

If they were fake what would that prove?

We can only assume this Adrienne Haslet is a crisis actor.

What about this video where they use the same woman actor in two different incidents, the alleged boston bombing and then just a few days later in the alleged Massachusetts shooting?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFU5YAgqAck

Why would that be odd? Lots of people from Newtown were at the marathon. They were specifically invited there.

No, **** like this doesn't just happen. It's meticulously planned, but they still don't do a great job and end up leaving plenty of clues.

I have a hard time believing any big news (propaganda) piece, not just this one, due to government/central bank/media conglomerates that have as much power and secrecy as they seem to need, in order to get away with these stunts. So at this point, the standard of evidence needs to be way more convincing from now on if i'm to be made a believer (sheep)

Abbaddon: stop waffling your pointless rhetoric I have no idea what you're even getting at, but you certainly haven't addressed any of the facts that i've presented. You say " get back to me" three times and "maybe then" three times. Has some one been implementing the magical power of three into their everyday dialogue..

So you made up your mind long ago that a huge information resource was all fake based entirely on inventions of your mind. That is not impressive.

Bragging that you don't trust the news for no reason is not going to help you here.
 
OneTime, what do you think a bomb site should look like?
What do you think the casualties should look like?

Have you ever seen injuries like this yourself?
 
No, **** like this doesn't just happen. It's meticulously planned, but they still don't do a great job and end up leaving plenty of clues.
Yet you can provide no evidence of the plan, let alone the planners.

I have a hard time believing any big news (propaganda) piece, not just this one, due to government/central bank/media conglomerates that have as much power and secrecy as they seem to need, in order to get away with these stunts. So at this point, the standard of evidence needs to be way more convincing from now on if i'm to be made a believer (sheep)
Your belief is irrelevant. I care not a whit which crackpottery you adhere to.

Abbaddon: stop waffling your pointless rhetoric I have no idea what you're even getting at, but you certainly haven't addressed any of the facts that i've presented. You say " get back to me" three times and "maybe then" three times. Has some one been implementing the magical power of three into their everyday dialogue..
All this tells me is that you have no experience of gross trauma.
 
According to reports, he was caught at 7pm, is this how dark it gets at 7pm mid april in Boston? And why would they use day for night, what is the purpose, other than to confuse people more?

I'm crazy to have searched this, but here's a list of the sunset times in Boston for April 2013. Looks like it would have been fairly dark around seven. Of course, I'm sure that's just another government shill site.




8:45 p.m. - The second marathon bombing suspect, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, is taken into custody.


http://boston.cbslocal.com/2013/04/19/timeline-search-for-marathon-bombings-suspects/
 
Why would that be odd? Lots of people from Newtown were at the marathon. They were specifically invited there.

In large part this year's Marathon had been pointedly dedicated to the Newtown victims and survivors, and many were in attendance.
 
OneTime said:
We can only assume this Adrienne Haslet is a crisis actor.
Because just assuming something is so much safer than actually going there to see for yourself, where you might learn that you are wrong and idiotic.
 

Back
Top Bottom