• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Books you hate

Book whose title I have long since forgotten by No idea who. It was some kind of juvenile African jungle adventure novel, which I was into up to my eyebrows at age 13 or so. I tried to read it twice and both times gave up when the chief of the tribe (African, remember) comes into the tent wearing a TIGER skin! Very painful collaps of my virgin efforts at suspension-of-disbelief, that was :(

After dutifuly giving quench-hunting a go, I chucked dear Thomas Covenant into the attic since I don't have access to any badger manure. Pretentious drivel.

Just finished reading the Quicksilver cycle for the third time and feel inspired by this thread to re-visit Moby Dick, which I remember as being funny, wise, and beautifully written. De gustibus...
 
Come on, nobody can really "hate" something like LOTR or Harry Potter. Can they? These are self-consistent literary worlds, terms of art, effluences of imagination.

These types of things are not hate-able by me. Others that choose to hate based on fictional characters, are free to base actions on belief.
 
OK, I don't hate LOTR, I just don't want to be subjected to it...
 
Come on, nobody can really "hate" something like LOTR or Harry Potter. Can they? These are self-consistent literary worlds, terms of art, effluences of imagination.

In general, I would agree, but since you've used the term "nobody" I'd put forth Donaldson (whom I dislike), Moorcock and Pratchett. All of whom, IIRC, if not hate, then bear a strong dislike for Professor Tolkien's efforts. As I understand it, their issues run the gambit from anti-epic hero, to frustration and anger with a paternalistic, patriarchial promotion.
 
I don't know the authors just mentioned--but I trust the readership of this board enough to predict an intense dislike for them. So I'll avoid them unless it's impossible. Time is short.

My little point, which I'm entirely convinced was appreciated, is that the term "hate" is now something to be considered. If I for some reason commit violent injury to another, that is one thing, but if I was "hating" at the time my crime would be worthy of stricter punishment. So I just decided not to hate anything at any time or in any way. I'm a purist in that respect now.
 
I hate The God Delusion, everything Spong wrote, anything supposedly refuting creation science, and so on and pretending to be "reason". Thank you.
 
I hate The God Delusion, everything Spong wrote, anything supposedly refuting creation science, and so on and pretending to be "reason". Thank you.

What is your opinion of The Literal Interpretation of Genesis by St. Augustine of Hippo?
 
I hate The God Delusion, everything Spong wrote, anything supposedly refuting creation science, and so on and pretending to be "reason". Thank you.

That's funny because I love reading creation "science" and just about everything that supports it. Not all the time, mind you, because the arguments are pretty much the same twelve arguments over and over, but I do like to see just how far individuals or groups can take those arguments. It's also quite fun to see how vehement and angry they can get. But that's just me.

I also like to push buttons.:D
 
Come on, nobody can really "hate" something like LOTR or Harry Potter. Can they? These are self-consistent literary worlds, terms of art, effluences of imagination.

The person earlier who said they started screaming in rage 25 pages into Harry Potter amused me. In the first 25 pages it's obvious you're getting this light-hearted magic fantasy, with some dry british humor thrown in. There's nothing to get outraged by; at best you could complain that it's juvenile or unoriginal.

I suspect the rage comes from the media blitz and constant hounding by friends to read the books. Or humorous exaggeration for the purposes of an internet message board.
 
Epic Fantasy is awful, the entire genre. In general, the books in the series follow the same plot, which involves a pauper who is actually king, his mysterious mentor, a magical artifact or two, a poorly constructed love interest, and a rising evil who imperils civilization.

I will never understand why anybody considers the works of Terrys Goodkind or Brooks to be readable, let alone well written. Darkover and CJ Cherryh also baffle me. Maybe they get better later, but I still cannot understand how so many people I've met include them in the canons of fantasy literature.

I still cannot believe that I paid for any of the above books. Unfortunately, having purchased such, and other like books, I then made several unfortunate attempts to read most of them. I have long since concluded that there is very little well written fantasy not intended for children. Which is why I still read children's books on occasion.

It seems like the authors in this genre generally had a fantasy world they wanted to write about, but, were unable to come up with a plot. In fact, I'm fairly certain that that's the case, because I made that mistake myself. I, fortunately, realized I had no plot and prevented a literary travesty, as I suspect most such teenagers do.

The absolute worst offender, is /The Iron Tower/, by Dennis McKiernan. This book makes Robert Jordan look like an outright literary genius. It is as if a mentally-challenged twelve year old decided to write an indelibly racist version of Lord of the Rings. I simply could not believe that any book could be written so horribly, could not believe that a book so awful could ever be published, and, like watching a train wreck, I could not look away. If the writing had been better, it would have made a decent parody of the genre, but the writing itself was awful.

There are a few other books I've purchased which I've also sorely regretted, for the most part, I learned to put them down since /Iron Tower/. Most of these books were bad erotica disguised as fantasy or science fiction.
The very worst book I've ever read was vanity published, so that was my fault for not suspecting anything odd in a 22 dollar paperback published by "Writers Club Press."

As far as classic literature goes, /War and Peace/ is boring, but I'll put off judging it until I learn Russian. Maybe it's just a bad translation.
I greatly disliked /Of Mice and Men/. Part of it may have been that I came to really dislike that English teacher though, and anything associated with her class.
 
The absolute worst offender, is /The Iron Tower/, by Dennis McKiernan. This book makes Robert Jordan look like an outright literary genius.

I only read the first book of that, and didn't mind it- I knew it was a Tolkien rip-off, and had no illusions of it being anything else.

I did read the "Silver Call", which was his sequel. It was basically a rip-off of the Moria-crawling parts of LoTR. Throughout the book, they use the term "pick" as a synonym, for sword, which I thought odd.

In the middle of one of the books, they are trapped by "orcs" in a dead end, at the very end of which is a slot and two runes which mean "west" and "pick". The reader says, "well, duh", but the characters have no idea what this means, so they make ready for their last stand, which includes the "elf" holding aloft his sword, and solliiquizing "This pick, which came out of the West, shall taste blood..."

The "hobbit" draws the obvious conclusion, and saves the party.
 
Confederacy of Dunces by John Kennedy Toole. It has the most unlikeable protagonist I've ever come across. If Toole was anything like Ignatius J. Reilly, I'm not a bit surprised he killed himself.

On the plus side, between this book and the Janet Cooke incident, I've been free to ignore Pullet Surprise-winning works since 1981.

HG
 
Totally agree with Life of Pi. So many people told me it was really good, so I expected something at least readable. The ending was terrible. I'm surprised I made it to the end, but I was on a plane with nothing else to read.

Reading Atlas Shrugged now. Tried to read it 6 years ago and gave up, so I'm challenging myself to finish it, just so I know whether I hate it or not.

I read The Pleasure of My Company by Steve Martin, because my old roommate claimed it was one of the funniest books he ever read. I think I maybe laughed once. It was dull.
 
On the silly side, I do still have a vestige of the shudder when I have to reach for the Chicago Manual of Style or the publication manual of the American Psychological Association. They're still segregated from the rest of my books in a little apartheid section. Not hate, mind you, but still the memory of intense dislike. I admire and value and respect their qualities, but dread the inevitable hard work and editing that follows every time I have to touch them.
 
The worst book I ever read was The Lovely Bones. It made me want to stab my eyes out with pitchforks so that I might never again even accidentally read a single sentence from the piece of crap again. Dreadful. I have no idea how people who can't write end up with book deals.
 
Maybe they have book kaleidoscopes in Minitrue, like the ones that they use for songwriting except for books?
 
Confederacy of Dunces by John Kennedy Toole. It has the most unlikeable protagonist I've ever come across. If Toole was anything like Ignatius J. Reilly, I'm not a bit surprised he killed himself.


HG

You hate my favorite book (A Confederacy of Dunces.) Perhaps seeing a part of myself as Ignatious and being able to laugh makes my life better. I hope "not a bit surprised" doesn't equal happy.
 
Last edited:
Epic Fantasy is awful, the entire genre. In general, the books in the series follow the same plot, which involves a pauper who is actually king, his mysterious mentor, a magical artifact or two, a poorly constructed love interest, and a rising evil who imperils civilization.
How about a reverse plot? The king ends up as a pauper?
The absolute worst offender, is /The Iron Tower/, by Dennis McKiernan. This book makes Robert Jordan look like an outright literary genius. It is as if a mentally-challenged twelve year old decided to write an indelibly racist version of Lord of the Rings. I simply could not believe that any book could be written so horribly, could not believe that a book so awful could ever be published, and, like watching a train wreck, I could not look away. If the writing had been better, it would have made a decent parody of the genre, but the writing itself was awful.
More liek The Iron Dream, amirite?
There are a few other books I've purchased which I've also sorely regretted, for the most part, I learned to put them down since /Iron Tower/. Most of these books were bad erotica disguised as fantasy or science fiction.
The very worst book I've ever read was vanity published, so that was my fault for not suspecting anything odd in a 22 dollar paperback published by "Writers Club Press."
"Slashfic", yay!
 
Last edited:
Whew! When I saw The Alchemist being slated, I thought I had gone off my rocker. First of all, I thought it was too obscure to be garnering so much attention. Then I finally realised you folks were talking about the more (in)famous novel by Paulo Coelho, rather than the fantasy tripe I was thinking of, by Peter James (hey, but I like it).

Turns out the one I was thinking of is actually titled Alchemist, sans the 'The':

(can't post links yet, but you can easily find it on Amazon et. al.)

While we're on the subject, my favourite Peter James Book is Host, a modern cautionary tale with quite a few surprising twists...

Cheers,
MetzO'Magic
 
You hate my favorite book (A Confederacy of Dunces.) Perhaps seeing a part of myself as Ignatious and being able to laugh makes my life better. I hope "not a bit surprised" doesn't equal happy.

No, it doesn't make me happy. As a rule, I don't tend to cheer people on to commit suicide!

And I'm willing to admit that I require likeable protagonists, which may or may not be a weakness on my part. I read non-fiction for information, but I read fiction for entertainment (with some information thrown in, if I'm lucky), and I'm not entertained by disagreeable "heroes."

Right now, I'm reading Michael Chabon's "The Yiddish Policemen's Union," which was highly recommended to me by two people whose opinions I respect. Yet, it's not doing anything for me. Oh well.

HG
 

Back
Top Bottom