• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Books you hate

Seconded. Though I have to wonder what made you (or anyone) read beyond the first book. Perhaps the same train-wreck fascination that made me finish the first book?

It can't possibly be this bad all the way through...

I actually liked Wizard's First Rule... wayyyyy back. But I was young and foolish and did not know better. Today I realize what a complete turd it is.

I suck for having tastes that run contrary to your own?

Well, now I understand why you like what you do... **coughimmaturitycough**

:D
Nah, just good taste. :D

Heinlein, however, had like two compelling ideas buried in two dozen loads of pure, bitter crap,
Stranger in a Strange Land and Time Enough For Love are bitter crap? *sigh*

and GRRM doesn't really even have one compelling idea that hasn't been handled more elegantly by a dozen other authors.
Such as? If you don't mind me asking, how far did you get?
 
Grrrr!
(I found out about six months later that I wasn't reading the famed series by Lilian Jackson Braun, but just some book with "cat" in the title.)

...and even Lilian seems to have lost her touch. The last several books have had illogical premises, rambling plots and weak resolutions. It's like she's gotten on this "Cat Who..." treadmill and won't get off but won't do it right either.
 
The Old Testament. It's amazing how the authors of the Old Testament took stomach-churning, absolutely disgusting acts of violence, rape, more violence, incest, animal sacrifice, more violence...and then somehow managed to make it all extremely boring. I didn't think that was possible before I started reading the Bible.


But I was told that "god" was the author...:rolleyes:

Seriously, actually reading the old and new testaments actually convinced me to leave Christianity when I was a teenager, so I guess they do have some value.:)
 
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe by C S Lewis.

Closely followed by anything else by C S Lewis.
 
Harry Potter.

OK--I only attempted to read the 4th book. I really tried. I got less than half way before I decided that life was too short and there are too many GOOD books around to waste any more time on it.
 
I really hated Gerald's Game by Stephen King. I'm a Stephen King fan, but this book had a whole lot of things in it that I didn't enjoy reading. When King went into the detailed description of the starving dog ripping the skin off of Gerald's face and eating it, I decided I'd had enough. I threw the book away.
 
Foucault's Pendulum, by Umberto Eco. Colossal waste of time. Pretty much the same plot as The da Vinci Code, except that it pretended to be some kind of intellectual exercise.

are you serious? Eco is my favorite modern writer, though, so i guess YMMV.

i'm kinda pissed about TWoT. i had been reading that series since middle school (about book 4 i was reading out of habit more than actual enjoyment), and i'm not happy that we'll never get a real version of the final book, as i really want to close that chapter on my life.
 
Last edited:
‘Quicksilver’ by Neal Stephenson. I’d got so excited that I bought it in hardback. After god knows how many pages of character-light, research-heavy rambling, and as yet no sign of any particular narrative direction, I left it quietly to the mercies of the local charity shop.

Bad books by bad authors I tend to regard merely with pity. Hating Dan Brown would be a waste of emotional energy. Bad books by good authors feel like a betrayal.
After Criptomonicon, it seemed like bait and switch. I just didn't go for Baroque.
 
The Hunger of Memory by Richard Rodriguez is pretty grating for me.
You can only take so much bragging about his going to cocktail parties in Bel-Air and becoming very successful for so long.
 
Only 15,691 more lines to go, then!

And in two months you never learned that it is in fact called "Iliad"? ;)

Yup :) spot on... and i still maintain that it is a GOOD story AND the subject of a billion-dollar-box-office-buster-hollywood-movie just recently but THAT teacher nearly scared me away. (I haven't seen the movie)
 
Crime and Punishment and Les Miserables.


I had to slog my way through these in high school. I tried to like them. Heck I eventually learned to like James Joyce. But these two books, I pulled each page out and burned them.





Boo
I actually read Les Miserables in a week, thought it was a roaring good read.
Someone mentioned that almost anything that you're forced to read is going to be torturous. I think that's true, as I've gone back to Faulkner to re-read As I Lay Dying, and found, upon reflection, that it is insightful and strangely relevant to modern thinking.

That said, I absoloutly abhorred In the Wet by Nevil Shute. I never read On the Beach, but the idea seemed like an interesting one, so when I saw In the Wet for a quarter, I bought it.

Spoiler alert: About a full third of the words in this pile are dedicated to unneccessary and dull descriptions of calculating the fuel needed for a flight leg, or the fuel used for a flight. N.B., at no time is there a dramatic chance that the amount of fuel is going to insufficient, the author merely assumes that the reader is very interested in calculating fuel loads. The beginning of the novel holds promise, but there is zero plot development.
Nothing. Ever. Happens.
 
i'm kinda pissed about TWoT. i had been reading that series since middle school (about book 4 i was reading out of habit more than actual enjoyment), and i'm not happy that we'll never get a real version of the final book, as i really want to close that chapter on my life.

We might, actually. He left behind a lot of notes, and it's likely that his wife will complete it.

And since it's not Jordan writing, it might actually be better. :D
 
Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand.

What a god-awful piece of tripe.

And yet it constantly comes up as on "most influential novels" lists all the time. I'm not certain if that's a good thing or a bad, as L. Ron Hubbard sometimes makes those same lists! :D

Most recent hyped books that I've disliked are The Historian by Elizabeth Kostova. A lot of Neil Gaiman's stuff doesn't do much for me. Much of Oprah's Book Club I find blase at best.

Older "classics" include Hemmingway (although his descriptions of food are impressive), Melville (though not his short stories), and Cervantes.
 
Atlas Shrugged and the Sword of Truth series. God, I hate objectivists. And the books are offensively bad, even apart from that.
 
Hmm...maybe the library is the savior of us all. I read Dostoyevsky only on assignment in college, and the work was to figure out *Notes from Undrground* which is a nasty, depressing thing. So given my lack of backround has sort of poisoned my opinion of the author. But he's a great writer, so I always wanted to find out more at leisure. I read *Crime and Punishment* during a period of my life where it was making good resonance with me. I was VERY GLAD that I had read the real book, in the words of the real author, before I saw the mini-series-HBO-TV that Patrick Stewart did (he's the police man). I remember saying to myself "thank me that I have a version of this that doesn't involve Picard!'--just like putting real living actors into a role like Gandalf (Magneto...Richard III...).

I guess my attitude as reader is to get tight with the author first, before watching movies. Maybe that's the real definition of "literature"--something that happens between author and reader, without visual effects or other relational media (soundtracks, etc.).
 

Back
Top Bottom