Mark said:
Since you totally misunderstood my point, I can't see any purpose in responding.
Thank you very much for your explanation.
Actually I don't think I did misunderstand your point, so much as I did demolish it.
Mark said:
Since you totally misunderstood my point, I can't see any purpose in responding.
Diamond said:
Thank you very much for your explanation.
Actually I don't think I did misunderstand your point, so much as I did demolish it.![]()
What is meant by our time?Originally posted by a_unique_person
I can find scientists for you very quickly, who are very clever, who don't
believe in evolution. However, most scientists agree with evolution,
despite the fact that we have seen no new species appear in our time,
only variations of species.
Diamond said:
"When you know that the claim is true, and generally accepted and well established, then yes, it is 'nick-picking.' It's also petty, pointless, and time consuming. It's like asking for a citation for Newton's laws of motion, or evidence that the sky is blue. No honest debate can proceed under these kinds of conditions."
- Brian the Snail